RESUMO
A meta-analysis of the Chinese studies in April 2020, including 3600 patients with cancer and COVID-19, first reported an increase of the COVID-19 risk and the case-fatality in these patients. Then, North-American and European series confirmed the increased COVID-19 risk for patients with cancer, as the increased risk of severe COVID-19 and death, when compared with general population, adjusting for age. Patients with lung cancer have the highest risk of severe respiratory forms, and the highest risk of SARS-CoV2-induced death (25 to 30%), after patients with hematological cancers. Metastatic patients, with poor PS, and those having received a cytotoxic chemotherapy within the weeks preceding SARSCoV2 infection, are those with the highest risk of death. Conversely, being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors would not favor the cytokine storm, which makes the severity of COVID-19. SARS-CoV2 pandemic, beyond having needed the generalization of drastic social distancing measures in hospitals, also needed organizational changes, to allow healthcare continuity for cancer patients. Adaptation of therapeutic protocols was needed, with increased intervals between cycles, the choice of less toxic protocols, the systematic use of hematological growth factors, and teleconsultations follow-up. Lastly, mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines are efficient in patients with thoracic cancer, provided the interval of 21/28 days between the two injections is maintained, since protective immunization seems delayed, especially after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Only 13% of patients with very low protective antibodies titers would need a third booster injection, with a clear rise in protective antibodies titers induced by such a third injection.© 2021 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been a breakthrough in the care of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). However, physicians are now facing a previously unidentified clinical situation called hyperprogression (HP), which presents as a fast and unexpected increase in tumor burden. HP's existence and specificity to ICIs remains controversial because a widely acknowledged definition is currently lacking. Meanwhile, management remains elusive. METHODS: Medical records from all consecutive NSCLC patients who were treated with ICI from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The HP incidence rate was calculated according to five definitions (tumor growth rate [TGR]ratio, ΔTGR, tumor growth kinetic [TGK], RECIST, and time to treatment failure [TTF]), and the agreement between such definitions was determined. The HP impact on overall survival (OS) was then assessed. The association between HP (defined using the TGRratio definition) and clinical and biological variables was also assessed. Clinical HP management and its impact on outcomes were described. RESULTS: We identified 169 consecutive ICI-treated patients, with potential HP accounting for 11.3 %, 5.7 %, 17.0 %, 9.6 %, and 31.7 % patients, according to TGRratio, ΔTGR, TGK, RECIST, and TTF definitions. Agreement between the different HP definitions was highly heterogeneous (range 29 %-77 %) and globally poor. HP was associated with shorter OS, compared to standard RECIST progressive disease, but this difference only reached statistical significance when using the TTF definition. TGRratio-based HP was significantly associated with hepatic metastases. In TGRratio-based HP patients, neither resuming chemotherapy nor corticosteroids use was associated with statistically significant impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION: We found fairly heterogeneous HP rates using different definitions. TTF was the only definition leading to significantly worsened OS. Further studies are needed to provide consensus recommendations for the assessment, definition, and management of HP, whose existence is likely real.