[Rapid progress of cirrhosis in hepatitis C: the role of age at the time of viral contamination]. / Rapidité d'évolution vers la cirrhose après hépatite C: influence de l'âge au moment de la contamination par le virus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors for the progression to liver cirrhosis in hepatitis C. METHODS: One hundred thirty six patients (79 men; 57 women; mean age 39 years) with transfusion or intravenous drug use-associated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were studied. Sex, cause of infection, duration of contamination, and genotype were studied as predictive factors of progression to liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty three patients presented with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis and 13 had cirrhosis. At the time of liver biopsy, rates of cirrhosis were: 0% before 40 years, 10% between 40 and 60 years, and 47% after 60 years. (p < 0.05). Rates of cirrhosis according to the age at the time of contamination were as follows: 3% before 30 years; 16% between 30 and 50 years; 46% after 50 years even though duration of the disease was comparable in the three groups. In multivariate analysis, two independent factors were associated with liver cirrhosis: age at contamination and duration of infection. CONCLUSION: Duration of infection and especially age at contamination seem better correlated with the probability of cirrhosis than the route of transmission or the genotype 1b. The results of this study suggest that progression to cirrhosis is slower in cases of contamination before 30 years of age than later on. Age at the time of contamination is an important predictive factor of progression to cirrhosis.

Comparison of a low dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 is a non-absorbable, non-metabolised osmotic agent used in lavage solutions for gut cleansing. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of PEG and lactulose in chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with chronic constipation entered a multicentre, randomised, comparative trial. They initially received two sachets containing either PEG (13 g/sachet) or lactulose (10 g/sachet) and were given an option to change the dose to one or three sachets/day, depending on response. RESULTS: Ninety nine patients completed the trial. After four weeks, patients in the PEG group (n=50) had a higher number of stools and a lower median daily score for straining at stool than patients in the lactulose group (n=49). Overall improvement was greater in the PEG group. Clinical tolerance was similar in the two groups, but flatus was less frequently reported in the PEG group. The mean number of liquid stools was higher in the PEG group but the difference was significant only for the first two weeks. There were no serious adverse events and no significant change in laboratory tests in either group. At the end of the study, the number of sachets used by the patients was 1.6 (0.7)/day in the PEG group and 2.1 (0.7)/day in the lactulose group. Sixty one patients completed a further two months open study of one to three sachets PEG daily; there was no loss of efficacy and no serious toxicity. CONCLUSION: Low dose PEG 3350 was more effective than lactulose and better tolerated.