Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 139(4): 851-856, 2024 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284137

RESUMO

Prompt recognition and management of critical events is pivotal for the provision of safe anesthetic care. This requires a well-functioning team that focuses on effective communication, timely decision-making, and escalation of potential complications. We believe that variation in bedside care leads to "near-misses," adverse outcomes, and serious safety events (SSEs). The principles of an escalation culture have been used successfully in other highly reliable industries such as aviation, military, and manufacturing. We discuss here the introduction of a unique and compelling thought-process for developing an intraoperative escalation protocol that is specifically tailored for our institution. Inspired by a critical intraoperative event, this departmental protocol was developed based on an analysis of multispecialty literature and expert opinion to decrease the incidence of SSEs. It includes a stepwise approach and incorporates patient-specific information to guide team members who encounter dynamic clinical situations. The implementation of the protocol has facilitated continuous quality improvement through iterative education, improving communication, and enhancing decision-making. Concurrently, we have plans to incorporate technology and electronic decision support tools to enhance real-time communication, monitor performance, and foster a culture of safety.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Humanos , Anestesiologia/normas , Anestesiologia/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/normas , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente/normas
4.
J Clin Anesth ; 85: 111040, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immediate postoperative extubation (IPE) can reduce perioperative complications and length of stay (LOS), however it is performed variably after liver transplant across institutions and has historically excluded high-risk recipients from consideration. In late 2012, we planned and implemented a single academic institution structured quality improvement (QI) initiative to standardize perioperative care of liver transplant recipients without exceptions. We hypothesized that such an approach would lead to a sustained increase in IPE after primary (PAC) and delayed abdominal closure (DAC). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 591 patients from 2013 to 2018 who underwent liver transplant after initiative implementation. We evaluated trends in incidence of IPE versus delayed extubation (DE), and reintubation, LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 476/591 (80.5%) recipients underwent PAC (278 IPE, 198 DE) and 115/591 (19.5%) experienced DAC (39 IPE, 76 DE). When comparing data from 2013 to data from 2018, the incidence of IPE increased from 9/67 (13.4%) to 78/90 (86.7%) after PAC and from 1/12 (8.3%) to 16/23 (69.6%) after DAC. For the same years, the incidence of IPE after PAC for recipients with MELD scores ≥30 increased from 0/19 (0%) to 12/17 (70.6%), for recipients who underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplant increased from 1/8 (12.5%) to 4/5 (80.0%), and for recipients who received massive transfusion (>10 units of packed red blood cells) increased from 0/17 (0%) to 10/13 (76.9%). Reintubation for respiratory considerations <48 h after IPE occurred in 3/278 (1.1%) after PAC and 1/39 (2.6%) after DAC. IPE was associated with decreased intensive care unit (HR of discharge: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.58, 2.33; P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (HR of discharge: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.76; P < 0.001) but demonstrated no association with mortality. CONCLUSION: A structured QI initiative led to sustained high rates of IPE and reduced LOS in all liver transplant recipients, including those classified as high risk.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Fígado , Período Pós-Operatório , Tempo de Internação
5.
J Clin Anesth ; 77: 110623, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34896694

RESUMO

Veno-veno extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used as a bridge to recovery in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients who have reversible lung failure. We present a complication of ECMO cannula placement/position resulting in hemodynamic and oxygenation alterations. These demonstrate principles related to the interaction of the VV ECMO circuit and patient cardio-pulmonary physiology. Consideration and comprehension of pulmonary shunt fraction, ECMO cannula recirculation ratio and ECMO blood flow to cardiac output (CO) ratio are central to continuous assessment and diagnosis of cardio-pulmonary changes encountered during management of VV ECMO.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Cânula/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Pulmão , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA