A health economic model to assess the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in obese type 2 diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is a common condition in type 2 diabetic patients. Treating obesity may enhance hypoglycemic treatment and contribute to the reduction of long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications. Orlistat reduces cardiovascular risk factors in obese type 2 diabetic patients. The objectives of this study were to estimate the long-term clinical consequences of this weight loss and the resulting cost-effectiveness of treating obese type 2 diabetic patients with orlistat. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to predict, over a 10-year period, the complication rates and mortality with and without a 2-year orlistat treatment, assuming a 5-year catch-up period after treatment. A stepwise approach was used to obtain the clinical data. First, the impact of weight loss with orlistat on HbA(1c), blood pressure, and cholesterol was assessed; then, the impact on mortality and micro- and macrovascular complications of decreasing these risk factors was applied. Four subgroups were studied based on the presence of risk factors. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness varies between 3,462 Euro/life-year gained (LYG) for obese diabetic patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia and 19,986 Euro/LYG for obese diabetic patients without other risk factors. The latter result is not robust according to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that orlistat is cost-effective in the management of obese type 2 diabetic patients, especially in those with the presence of hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertension. Evidence on longer-term benefits of orlistat (>2 years) will be of importance for future decision-making.

A health economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in patients with moderate chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The treatment of patients with moderate chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels is still under discussion and the cost-effectiveness of such strategy is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of their treatment in comparison with no treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The assessed treatment is composed of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin, which is the current standard treatment. Two groups were studied: patients with genotype 1 and patients with genotypes 2-3. At the beginning of the study, patients were aged of 45. Long-term economic and clinical outcomes over a 30 year period were predicted using a Markov simulation model. A health care payer perspective was chosen. Data were obtained from published literature. Variations of uncertainty parameters were assessed through a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were Euro 5,338/QALY for genotype 1 and Euro 1,080/QALY for genotypes 2-3. In the sensitivity analysis, ratios remained lower than Euro 20,000. A Monte Carlo simulation with 1,000 iterations gives a 95% confidence interval for the ICER of Euro 3,199 to Euro 8,972 for genotype 1 and Euro 56 to Euro 1,981 for genotypes 2-3. CONCLUSION: Even though the treatment of these patients generates a cost, it has the advantage that in comparison with no treatment, a great number of people are cured, complications are less frequent and patients gain more quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), which involves an ICER considered as acceptable for the European society (< Euro 20,000).