Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Health Promot ; 33(8): 1123-1133, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31203639

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To inform health behavior intervention design, we sought to quantify loneliness and its correlates, including social media use, among adults in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional research panel questionnaire. SETTING: Responses were gathered from individuals in all 50 states surveyed via Internet from February 2018 to March 2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20 096 US panel respondents aged 18+. MEASURES: The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale (theoretical score range = 20-80) was administered along with demographic, structural, cognitive, and behavioral items. ANALYSIS: After calibrating the sample to population norms, we conducted multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall mean survey-weighted loneliness score was 44.03 (standard error = 0.09). Social support (standardized ß [sß] = -0.19) and meaningful daily interactions (sß = -0.14) had the strongest associations with lower loneliness, along with reporting good relationships, family life, physical and mental health, friendships, greater age, being in a couple, and balancing one's daily time. Social anxiety was most strongly associated with greater loneliness (sß = +0.20), followed by self-reported social media overuse (sß = +0.05) and daily use of text-based social media (sß = +0.03). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that loneliness decreases with age, and that being in a relationship as well as everyday behavioral factors in people's control are most strongly related to loneliness. Population health promotion efforts to reduce loneliness should focus on improving social support, decreasing social anxiety, and promoting healthy daily behaviors.


Assuntos
Comportamento , Cognição , Solidão/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Depressão , Relações Familiares , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
2.
Psychiatr Serv ; 64(8): 800-3, 2013 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23903605

RESUMO

Clinicians often resent behavioral health managed care peer reviews. However, such reviews need not be onerous. This Open Forum, written by managed care physician reviewers, attempts to help attending psychiatrists, specifically those on inpatient units, achieve more satisfying outcomes for patients by adhering to a few basic principles. Beyond the level-of-care guidelines, attending psychiatrists are advised to focus on immediate acuity, along with specific life events that may have immediate impact on the patient's well-being. A clear diagnosis, relevant treatment plan, salient updates, and strategies for preventing readmission can justify additional treatment time. By contrast, "time-based treatments," dispositional issues, or a patient's lack of acceptance or effective use of treatment are harder to justify.


Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Revisão por Pares/normas , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatria/normas , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Prevenção Secundária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA