Source document verification in the Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry.

PURPOSE: The Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (MPS I) Registry is an international observational database that tracks the natural history and the outcomes of patients with MPS I. The Registry was a regulatory requirement following the approval of laronidase enzyme replacement therapy for MPS I in 2003. All data are collected voluntarily after informed consent from the patient or family. Data are checked through queries, monthly reviews, and electronic audits to identify missing, inconsistent, or invalid data. This analysis sought to determine overall data accuracy in the Registry through source document verification (SDV). METHODS: Two phases of SDV were performed. In each phase, Registry data were compared against source documents at sites in Europe, Latin America, and North America. Three patients were randomly selected for SDV at each of the selected sites among all patients enrolled ≥18 months and ever receiving laronidase. Key parameters central to MPS I and its treatment were examined from the baseline and the last available assessments. RESULTS: Results indicate an overall source-to-database error rate in the MPS I Registry of 2.7% (47 discrepancies out of 1715 items; 95% confidence interval [2.2%, 3.5%]) in Phase 1 and 3.7% (64 discrepancies out of 1732 items; 95% confidence interval [2.9%, 4.7%]) in Phase 2. No systematic errors were found. CONCLUSIONS: The overall error rates in both phases of SDV demonstrate acceptable data accuracy in the MPS I Registry within the data fields that were assessed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Medical Costs Related to Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis Types I, II, and VI in Brazil: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type I (MPS I), MPS type II (MPS II), and MPS type VI (MPS VI) are lysosomal storage disorders for which enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of medical interventions in a cohort of patients with MPS I, II, and VI on ERT to estimate the impact of direct medical costs associated with the treatment of MPS and compare its frequency with that observed among patients not on ERT. METHODS: This was a multicenter study using a retrospective design including a convenience sampling of Brazilian patients with MPS I, II, and VI. Data on the number and type of medical appointments, hospital admissions, medications used, and surgical procedures performed per patient were obtained through a review of medical records, as were data on ERT. These variables were then compared between patients undergoing ERT and those not on ERT. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (27 on ERT) were included in the study. Overall, between-group differences were found in median absolute frequencies of hospital admissions and surgical procedures per year, both of which were higher in the non-ERT group. Furthermore, we observed a high rate of failure to record medication dosage regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Brazilian patients with MPS I, II, and VI who are on ERT undergo fewer medical interventions, which can lead to a reduction in direct medical costs to the publicly funded health care system. The cost of ERT, however, is extremely high and probably outweighs this reduction.