Performance evaluation of Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit with a user-modified protocol.

The Cepheid Xpert® Norovirus kit automates sample processing, nucleic acid extraction, and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) to detect norovirus genogroups I (GI) and II (GII). Eighty-five stool samples collected between February 2015 and May 2017 were used to compare the performance of a user-modified Xpert assay against a clinically validated laboratory-developed test (LDT). Of the 85 samples, 54 were previously archived in -80°C freezer. The remaining 31 were fresh samples tested concurrently with the LDT. The results of all samples tested using the Xpert kit and LDT were found to be concordant, including 12 GI- and 42 GII-positive samples, 1 GI and GII coinfection, and 30 negative samples. Comparison of the assays showed perfect concordance with a kappa coefficient score of 1.00 (95%CI from 1.00 to 1.00). Of the 30 negative stool samples tested, three samples were positive for rotavirus detected using an immunochromatographic assay, with no cross-reactivity shown in both LDT and Xpert assays. In-run sample processing control of the Xpert assay for all negative samples tested showed no/minor inhibition. Compared to the LDT, the Xpert assay produced similar or better Ct values for detection. It also showed better mitigation of PCR inhibition in stool sample testing.

Evaluation of the Luminex ARIES HSV 1&2 Assay and Comparison with the FTD Neuro 9 and In-house Real-Time PCR Assays for Detecting Herpes Simplex Viruses.

BACKGROUND: Human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and type 2 (HSV-2) are responsible for a plethora of human diseases, of which cutaneous and mucocutaneous infections are the most prevalent. In its most severe form, HSV infection can cause meningitis/encephalitis. We compared the Luminex ARIES HSV 1&2 assay (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA), an automated sample-to-result molecular solution, to two non-automated HSV DNA assays. METHODS: A total of 116 artificial controls were used to determine the analytical performance of the ARIES assay. Controls were prepared by spiking universal transport medium (UTM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients who tested negative for HSV by an in-house HSV-1 and -2 DNA assay with reference materials (SeraCare Life Sciences, MA, USA; ZeptoMetrix Corp., MA, USA). Another 117 clinical samples were then used to compare the clinical performance of the ARIES assay with those of an in-house assay and the FTD Neuro 9 assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Junglinster, Luxembourg). RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity (95% limit of detection) of the ARIES assay was 318 copies/mL (UTM samples) and 935 copies/mL (CSF samples) for HSV-1 strain 96 and 253 copies/mL (UTM samples) and 821 copies/mL (CSF samples) for HSV-2 strain 09. No cross-reactivity was observed in samples spiked with 14 non-HSV microorganisms. Compared with the reference result (agreement between the in-house and FTD Neuro 9 results), the ARIES assay had overall concordance rates of 98.2% (111/113) and 100% (113/113) for HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ARIES assay appears to be an excellent alternative for rapid detection and differentiation of HSV in skin and genital infections, meningitis, and encephalitis.

CEBPA mutational analysis in acute myeloid leukaemia by a laboratory-developed next-generation sequencing assay.

AIM: The presence of biallelic CEBPA mutations is a favourable prognostic feature in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). CEBPA mutations are currently identified through conventional capillary sequencing (CCS). With the increasing adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, challenges with regard to amplification efficiency of CEBPA due to the high GC content may be encountered, potentially resulting in suboptimal coverage. Here, the performance of an amplicon-based NGS method using a laboratory-developed CEBPA-specific Nextera XT (CEBNX) was evaluated. METHODS: Mutational analyses of the CEBPA gene of 137 AML bone marrow or peripheral blood retrospective specimens were performed by the amplification of the CEBPA gene using the Expand Long Range dNTPack and the amplicons processed by CCS and NGS. CEBPA-specific libraries were then constructed using the Nextera XT V.2 kit. All FASTQ files were then processed with the MiSeq Reporter V.2.6.2.3 using the PCR Amplicon workflow via the customised CEBPA-specific manifest file. The variant calling format files were analysed using the Illumina Variant Studio V.2.2. RESULTS: A coverage per base of 3631X to 28184X was achieved. 22 samples (16.1%) were found to contain CEBPA mutations, with variant allele frequencies (VAF) ranging from 3.8% to 58.2%. Taking CCS as the 'gold standard', sensitivity and specificity of 97% and 97% was achieved. For the transactivation domain 2 polymorphism (c.584_589dupACCCGC/p.His195_Pro196dup), the CEBNX achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity relative to CCS. CONCLUSIONS: Our laboratory-developed CEBNX workflow shows high coverage and thus overcomes the challenges associated with amplification efficiency and low coverage of CEBPA. Therefore, our assay is suitable for deployment in the clinical laboratory.