Exploring emergency physicians' professional identities: a Q-method study.

Professional identities research in medical education has made significant contributions to the field. However, what comprises professional identities is rarely interrogated. This research tackles this relatively understudied component of professional identities research by understanding emergency medicine physicians' perspectives on the important elements that comprise their professional identities. Q-methodology was used to identify different clusters of viewpoints on professional identities; by extension, the core components that comprise emergency medicine physicians' professional identities are disclosed. Thirty-three emergency medicine physicians were recruited, through purposive sampling, from five hospitals across Taiwan. R software was used to analyse the Q-sorts, determine loadings on each viewpoint and formulate the viewpoint array. Analysis of interview data enhanced our understanding of these viewpoints. In total, twenty-five emergency medicine physicians loaded onto four distinct viewpoints, reflecting dominant perspectives of emergency medicine physicians' understanding of their professional identities. These distinct viewpoints demonstrated what emergency medicine physicians deemed significant in how they understood themselves. The viewpoints comprised: skills acquisition, capabilities and practical wisdom; coping ability and resilience; professional recognition and self-esteem; and wellbeing and quality of life. All viewpoints stressed the importance of trust between colleagues. These findings demonstrate the multitude of ways in which seemingly unified professional identities diverge across groups of individuals. An enhanced understanding of speciality work culture is gained. By understanding facets of professional identities, the development of future educational interventions and departmental initiatives, which might support key components of professional identities, can be explored.

Examining the association of career stage and medical specialty with personality preferences - a cross-sectional survey of junior doctors and attending physicians from various specialties.

BACKGROUND: Personality preference research on medical students and physicians demonstrates that personality preferences may affect one's choice of specialty and transform over the course of one's academic career as well as during one's time spent in the clinical setting. The literature offers valuable methods for evaluating medical curricula, understanding medical specialties, and rethinking communication techniques between educators and learners. In line with this encompassing body of work, this study examines the personality preferences of junior doctors and attending physicians from various specialties to investigate how career stage and medical specialty are associated with personality preferences. METHOD: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was applied to assess the personality preferences of junior doctors (postgraduates year 1-3) and attending physicians from six major medical specialties. Participants completed a self-administered 93-item questionnaire, while a certified MBTI practitioner explained the personality dichotomies as well as facilitated the self-evaluation process and the questionnaire's interpretation. Contrasted dichotomous scores and radar plots were employed to illustrate the distinction between junior doctors and attending physicians' personality preferences. All analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software, while a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to quantify the polarisation of personality preferences between junior doctors and attending physicians. RESULTS: In total, 98 participants were recruited, of whom 59 were attending physicians and 39 were junior doctors. The most common personality types among the junior doctors were ESTJ (15.4%), INTP (12.8%), and ESFJ (10.3%), while among the attending physicians, the most common types were ISTJ (23.7%) and ESTJ (18.6%). Both junior doctors and attending physicians expressed personality preferences for sensing, thinking, and judging. However, compared to the junior doctors, more polarised personality preferences were noted among the attending physicians for sensing (p = 0.038), thinking (p = 0.032), and judging (p = 0.024). Moreover, junior doctors exhibited less distinct personality preferences in this study. CONCLUSION: Attending physicians and junior doctors exhibited greater personality inclinations for sensing, thinking, and judging, although the former expressed these personality preferences more strongly than the latter. These findings highlight that, amongst physicians, career stage is strongly associated with the expression of personality preferences.

Safety net, gateway, market, sport, and war: Exploring how emergency physicians conceptualize and ascribe meaning to emergency care.

BACKGROUND: Metaphorical expressions and conceptualisations are widely used in medical discourse to convey complex and abstract concepts. Our study uses a novel way to examine the spontaneous use of metaphors by emergency physicians as they articulate their experiences of practicing emergency care. These co-constructions shed light on the values and beliefs that shape their emergency care practice. METHODS: We invited 25 Taiwanese emergency physicians to participate in one-to-one semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Drawing on social constructionism theory, systematic metaphor analysis method and Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP) we identified metaphorical linguistic expressions in their talk, grouping them into five-overarching conceptual metaphors. We argue that these metaphors underpin emergency physicians' experiences of practicing emergency medical care: Safety Net, Gateway, Market, War, and Sport. DISCUSSION: The Safety Net, Gateway, and Market conceptualisations highlight physician-patient relationships and the social mission, resource allocation, and consumerism aspects of emergency care practice. The Sport and War conceptualisations highlight the physician-physician relationship and the demanding, team-based nature of emergency care practice. CONCLUSION: We propose that the choice of metaphorical conceptualisation deployed by emergency physicians has implications on their embodiment of professional identities. This discussion of using metaphors to study professional identities contributes to the literature concerned with finding creative and innovative ways to research identities. Future studies may utilize metaphors to gain a comprehensive understanding of physicians' professional identities in other specialties.