Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 39(1): 203-10, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24123355

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate appropriate injection protocols for gadofosveset at 1.5 and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen young healthy volunteers were subjected to first-pass perfusion cardiac scans at 1.5 and 3 T MRI using three different injection protocols for gadofosveset (0.00375, 0.0075, and 0.0150 mmol/kg bodyweight) and two perfusions. At both field strengths a T1-weighted saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence with parallel imaging was employed. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), maximum contrast enhancement ratio (CER), peak-baseline difference, and upslope values were assessed. Moreover, sectors with dark banding artifacts were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant differences of the upslope values for first compared to second perfusion could be observed for the medium- and high-dose groups at 1.5 T (P < 0.01), but not at 3 T. Sectors with dark banding artifacts during first perfusion occurred significantly more often at the highest dose of gadofosveset compared to the lowest dose at 1.5 T (P = 0.04) and 3 T (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The best injection protocol for semiquantitative perfusion analysis at 1.5 T is 0.00375 mmol/kg, as higher doses lead to lower upslope values during the second perfusion. At 3 T 0.0075 mmol/kg should be used to avoid dark banding artifacts.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Gadolínio/administração & dosagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Miocárdio/patologia , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Imagem de Perfusão , Adulto , Artefatos , Peso Corporal , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Voluntários Saudáveis , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Razão Sinal-Ruído
2.
Intensive Care Med ; 48(9): 1165-1175, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953676

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This case-control study investigated the long-term evolution of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) over a 5-year period associated with the use of selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in the intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, effects on health care-associated infections and ICU mortality were analysed. METHODS: We investigated patients undergoing mechanical ventilation > 48 h in 11 adult ICUs located at 3 campuses of a university hospital. Administrative, clinical, and microbiological data which were routinely recorded electronically served as the basis. We analysed differences in the rates and incidence densities (ID, cases per 1000 patient-days) of MDRB associated with SOD use in all patients and stratified by patient origin (outpatient or inpatient). After propensity score matching, health-care infections and ICU mortality were compared. RESULTS: 5034 patients were eligible for the study. 1694 patients were not given SOD. There were no differences in the incidence density of MDRB when SOD was used, except for more vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (0.72/1000 days vs. 0.31/1000 days, p < 0.01), and fewer ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.22/1000 days vs. 0.56/1000 days, p < 0.01). After propensity score matching, SOD was associated with lower incidence rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and death in the ICU but not with ICU-acquired bacteremia or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of the ICU-acquired MDRB over a 5-year period revealed no differences in incidence density, except for lower rate of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and higher rate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium with SOD. Incidence rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and death in the ICU were lower in patients receiving SOD.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Descontaminação , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Vancomicina
3.
Pain ; 161(2): 266-273, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592999

RESUMO

Insufficient perioperative pain treatment is known as a highly predictive risk factor for the development of chronic postoperative pain. Remifentanil is an ultrashort-acting opioid that provides quick and efficient analgesia but is associated with the induction of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Despite these well-known characteristics, this substance is being increasingly used in anesthesia and in a variety of medical fields, such as intensive-care medicine and obstetrics. The aim of our study was to reveal whether remifentanil influences postoperative pain, the requirement for postoperative analgesics, and requirement of antiemetics (as indirect indicator of postoperative nausea and vomiting), as well as the effects on time to extubation and length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit in daily clinical routine. From an electronic medical records database of 55,693 anesthesias, we analyzed data from all patients receiving intraabdominal surgery (visceral, gynecological, and urological) under general anesthesia or combined general-epidural anesthesia by propensity score matching. The administration of remifentanil was associated with higher postoperative pain scores despite a higher requirement of postoperative analgesics. Additional epidural analgesia was not able to avoid this finding. The intraoperative use of remifentanil is associated with a deterioration of pain levels and postoperative analgesic requirement, wherefore the potential benefit of this substance seems to be outweighed by its potential disadvantages. Especially in operative procedures in which high postoperative pain scores are expected, the unreflective use should be critically questioned.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Remifentanil/uso terapêutico , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Dipirona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Pirinitramida/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/tratamento farmacológico , Sala de Recuperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos
4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 56(4): 731-737, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30891592

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Aortic surgery involving hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) results in a systemic inflammatory response that may negatively influence outcome. An extracorporeal haemadsorption (HA) device (CytoSorb®) that removes inflammatory triggers may improve haemodynamic and metabolic reactions due to excessive inflammation and, ultimately, outcome. METHODS: As a single-centre experience, the data of 336 patients who had undergone aortic surgery with HCA between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Patients with HA were matched to patients receiving standard therapy without HA (Control) by propensity score matching and compared subsequently. RESULTS: During aortic surgery with HCA, HA significantly reduced the requirement of norepinephrine (HA: 0.102 µg/kg/min; Control: 0.113; P = 0.043). Severe disturbances of acid-base balance as reflected by a pH lower than 7.19 (HA: 7.1%; Control: 11.6%; P = 0.139), maximum lactate concentrations (HA: 3.75 mmol/l; Control: 4.23 P = 0.078) and the need for tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane buffer (HA: 6.5%; Control: 13.7%; P = 0.045) were less frequent with HA. Compared to standard therapy, HA decreased the need for transfusion of packed red blood cells (1 unit; P = 0.021) and fresh frozen plasma (3 units; P = 0.001), but increased the requirement of prothrombin complex concentrate (800 IE, P = 0.0036). HA did not affect inflammatory laboratory markers on the first postoperative day. Differences in operative mortality (HA: 4.8%; Control: 8.8%) and the length of hospital stay (HA: 13.5 days; Control: 14) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: HA significantly reduces the need for vasopressors, the amount of transfusion and improves acid-base balance in aortic surgery with HCA. Multicentre prospective trials are required to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta/metabolismo , Doenças da Aorta/cirurgia , Parada Circulatória Induzida por Hipotermia Profunda , Hemadsorção , Hemodinâmica , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 29(7): 1527-36, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23739813

RESUMO

This study was performed to determine the best concentration of gadofosveset at 1.5 and 3 T MRI for quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis. 18 healthy volunteers have been examined at a 1.5 and a 3 T MRI system assigned to one of three dose groups: low dose (0.00375 mmol/kg), medium dose (0.0075 mmol/kg), high dose (0.0150 mmol/kg). A T1-weighted saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence with parallel imaging was used. Two perfusion scans were performed for each field strength and volunteer. Peak signal-to-noise-ratio, maximum contrast-enhancement-ratio and myocardial blood flow (MBF) were calculated. MBF values were significantly higher at 1.5 T in the medium and the high dose groups than in the low dose group (p < 0.001). Higher MBF values could be found at 3 T for the second perfusion scan in the medium and both perfusion scans in the high dose group compared to the low dose group. Optimal dose of gadofosveset for quantitative perfusion analysis at 1.5 T is 0.00375 mmol/kg as higher doses caused overestimation of the MBF. At 3 T 0.0075 mmol/kg seems to be the best dose for a single perfusion scan, while for a second perfusion scan MBF may be overestimated.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Circulação Coronária , Gadolínio , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/métodos , Compostos Organometálicos , Adulto , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Gadolínio/administração & dosagem , Alemanha , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Razão Sinal-Ruído , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA