Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(1): 367-376, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26081593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy increases complications, morbidity, risk of death, reduction of dose delivery and impairs quality of life. Primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis after chemotherapy is recommended in the guideline (GL) if the risk of FN is high (≥20%) or intermediate (≥10-20%) with additional risk factors. This study evaluated the implementation of G-CSF GL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sample size of the survey was calculated at 2% of the incidences of malignant lymphoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer in Germany in 2006. Patients were documented retrospectively over three to nine cycles of chemotherapy and FN risk ≥10%. Professional physician profiles were analyzed by classification and regression tree analysis (CART). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five hematologists-oncologists and pulmonologists and gynecologists specialized in oncology documented data of 666 lung cancer patients, 286 malignant lymphoma patients, and 976 breast cancer patients, with 7805 chemotherapy cycles; 85.1% of physicians claimed adhering to G-CSF GL. Adherence to GL in all high-FN-risk chemotherapy cycles was 15.4% in lung cancer, 84.5% in malignant lymphoma, and 85.6% in breast cancer, and in all intermediate-FN-risk chemotherapy cycles, lung cancer it was 38.8%, malignant lymphoma it was 59.4%, and breast cancer it was 49.3%. G-CSF was overused without additional patient risk factors in 7.2% lung cancer cycles, 16.8% malignant lymphoma cycles, and 17.6% breast cancer cycles. The CART analysis split pulmonologists and other specialists, with the latter adhering more to GL. Pulmonologists, trained less than 22.5 years, adhered better to GL, as did also gynecologists or hematologists-oncologists with professional experience less than 8.1 years. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of and adherence to G-CSF GL differed between lung cancer, lymphoma, and breast cancer. Physicians overestimate their adherence to the GL. Physicians adhering to the GL can be characterized.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/prevenção & controle , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/epidemiologia , Competência Clínica/normas , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Masculino , Oncologia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Phys Rev Lett ; 102(6): 066101, 2009 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19257608

RESUMO

Apparent c(2x2) superstructures within the narrow beams of an interference pattern spreading in the 100 directions at the surface of Cu(001) are observed by scanning tunneling microscopy. These features are induced by electron scattering from Ar- and Ne-filled subsurface nanocavities. The beams originate from electron anisotropy resulting in focusing of bulk electrons. We developed a model providing a good agreement between simulations and experiments. Particularly, a simple explanation of the angular distribution for the interference pattern and the period in the superstructure is found.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA