Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566610

RESUMO

Prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 is typically measured by nucleocapsid serology assays. In this study, we show that the Simoa serology assays and T cell intracellular cytokine staining assays are more sensitive than the clinical Elecsys assay for detection of nucleocapsid-specific immune responses. These data suggest that the prevalence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population may be higher than currently appreciated.

2.
Lancet HIV ; 11(2): e117-e124, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141639

RESUMO

An effective HIV-1 vaccine is a global health priority but has remained elusive for more than 40 years. Key scientific hurdles that have hampered vaccine development are the unprecedented genetic variability of the virus, the rapid establishment of persistent viral latency, and the challenges associated with induction of broadly neutralising antibodies. Clinical trials have been instrumental in evaluating scientific concepts and testing vaccine strategies. This Review discusses lessons learned from clinical trials of HIV-1 vaccines, current technologies that are being explored, and future considerations in the development of a safe and effective HIV-1 vaccine.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra a AIDS , Infecções por HIV , Soropositividade para HIV , HIV-1 , Humanos , HIV-1/genética , Soropositividade para HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa
3.
NPJ Vaccines ; 9(1): 89, 2024 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782902

RESUMO

Mosaic HIV-1 vaccines have been shown to elicit robust humoral and cellular immune responses in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), that had started antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute infection. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of 2 mosaic vaccine regimens in virologically suppressed individuals that had initiated ART during the chronic phase of infection, exemplifying the majority of PLWH. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial (IPCAVD013/HTX1002) 25 ART-suppressed PLWH were randomized to receive Ad26.Mos4.HIV/MVA-Mosaic (Ad26/MVA) (n = 10) or Ad26.Mos4.HIV/Ad26.Mos4.HIV plus adjuvanted gp140 protein (Ad26/Ad26+gp140) (n = 9) or placebo (n = 6). Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included HIV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers and HIV-specific T cell responses. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated with pain/tenderness at the injection site and fatigue, myalgia/chills and headache as the most commonly reported solicited local and grade 3 systemic adverse events, respectively. In the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group, Env-specific IFN-γ T cell responses showed a median 12-fold increase while responses to Gag and Pol increased 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. The breadth of T cell responses to individual peptide subpools increased from 11.0 pre-vaccination to 26.0 in the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group and from 10.0 to 14.5 in the Ad26/MVA group. Ad26/Ad26+gp140 vaccination increased binding antibody titers against vaccine-matched clade C Env 5.5-fold as well as augmented neutralizing antibody titers against Clade C pseudovirus by 7.2-fold. Both vaccine regimens were immunogenic, while the addition of the protein boost resulted in additional T cell and augmented binding and neutralizing antibody titers. These data suggest that the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 regimen should be tested further.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA