Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(2)2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30487303

RESUMO

Previous studies suggested that herpes simplex virus (HSV) PCR testing can be safely deferred in patients with normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) counts and protein levels as long as they are older than 2 years of age and are not immunocompromised, the so-called Reller criteria. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively assessed the validity of these screening criteria in our setting. A total of 4,404 CSF specimens submitted for HSV PCR testing to the respective microbiology laboratories at the participating hospitals between 2012 and 2018 were included. Six commercially available HSV PCR assays were used across the participating centers. Ninety-one of the 4,404 CSF specimens (2.1%) tested were positive for HSV DNA (75 samples for HSV-1 and 16 for HSV-2). Nine patients failed to meet the Reller criteria, of whom seven were deemed to truly have HSV encephalitis. Overall, no significant correlation between HSV PCR cycle threshold (CT ) values and WBC counts or total protein levels was found. In addition, median HSV PCR CT s were comparable between patients who met the Reller criteria and those who did not (P = 0.531). In summary, we show that HSV DNA may be detected in CSF specimens with normal WBC and protein levels collected from immunocompetent individuals older than 2 years with HSV encephalitis. Nevertheless, the data also indicate that the number of cases detected could be lowered at least by half if CSF specimens with borderline WBC counts (4 cells/mm3) as well as children of any age are systematically tested.


Assuntos
Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/virologia , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Encefalite por Herpes Simples/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Simplexvirus/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/química , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/citologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Simplexvirus/genética , Adulto Jovem
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(11): 2069-2074, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30105621

RESUMO

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted to gather information on current microbiological practices for active surveillance of carriage of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in hospitals from 14 health departments of the Autonomous Community of Valencia (ACV), Spain, which together provided medical attention to 3,271,077 inhabitants in 2017, approximately 70% of the population of the ACV. The survey consisted of 35 questions on MDR bacteria screening policies, surveillance approach chosen (universal vs. targeted), and microbiological methods and processes in use for routine detection and reporting of colonization by MDR bacteria, including the anatomical sites scheduled to be sampled for each MDR bacterial species, and the methodology employed (culture-based, molecular-based, or both). Our study revealed striking differences across centers, likely attributable to the lack of consensus on optimal protocols for sampling, body sites for screening, and microbiological testing, thus underscoring the need for consensus guidelines on these issues.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Hospitais Comunitários , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Estudos Transversais , Geografia , Humanos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 28 Suppl 3: 51-8, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21129587

RESUMO

Many professionals from distinct disciplines work in health centers and consequently these workplaces should be considered as service companies, involving human, material and financial resources aimed at providing a service required by society. Hospitals are one of the most complex types of company, in which diverse goods and services are produced and consumed. Like the hospital as a whole, the various units and departments in which the hospital is divided, including the microbiology department, are sufficiently different to be called distinct, but related, branches of the same company, given that none can perform their function without the others. Viewing a hospital service as a branch of a large company (the hospital as a whole) allows its production, the resources used in this production, and its clients to be identified more clearly. The healthcare model based on clinical management units aims to constitute a new organizational model for public health systems in which health strategies are performed that allow innovation and decentralization of the healthcare network. Clinical management provides the framework for attending to the population's healthcare needs through a person-centered approach and involves all the professionals in any of the settings in which healthcare is provided. Among the aims of this model is to guarantee continuity of care, facilitate comprehensive health promotion and deliver daily healthcare effectively. The main instruments of clinical management are structured knowledge of the population's health needs, the use of the best scientific knowledge available, and a comprehensive and participatory practical model, together with assessment tools. Three possible clinical management models are proposed for the work of specialists in microbiology and parasitology: a) a microbiology clinical management unit; b) a biological diagnosis clinical management unit, and c) a multidisciplinary clinical management unit with cross-competencies with affiliated specialties. The latter two models have strengths and weaknesses and the choice of any model must be based on mutual trust, respect for areas of knowledge and the search for synergy among the units and services forming these models. Any of the proposed models could be valid, although the selection of a particular model should consider the working environment, the size of the hospital, and the interpersonal relations within its components, which should be based on complementariness, dialogue and the search for consensus in decision-making to achieve a synergistic environment. The model that might best satisfy clinical microbiologists' expectations and promote their future development and survival in the era of automatization of most microbiological diagnostic procedures could be the multidisciplinary model.


Assuntos
Laboratórios/organização & administração , Microbiologia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar
5.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 26(1): 30-3, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23546459

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the adequacy of empirical antimicrobial treatment in pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective observational study of women admitted to the hospital with acute pyelonephritis between May 2004 and April 2011. Patients were included if the results of urine cultures and susceptibility testing to antibiotics were available. Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutical and outcome variables were collected from chart review. We considered inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment (IEAT) as the occurrence of microorganism that were not effectively treated at the time when the causative microorganism and its antibiotic susceptibility were known. RESULTS: Fifty women with appropriate microbiological data from a total of 93 cases of acute pyelonephritis were included in the study. The women's mean age was 26.4 years, and 58% were nulliparous. Pyelonephritis was developed in the 2nd and 3rd trimester in 88% of cases. Previous urinary tract infections were recorded in 34%. Escherichia coli was the most frequent microorganism (70%). The proportion of patients who received IEAT was 10%. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and cephalosporines were the most predominant antibiotics used, with a proportion of IEAT of 10.3% and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with pyelonephritis received IEAT in a small but significant number of cases. Amoxicillin-clavulante and cephalosporines were adequate in most cases. More studies are needed to define the clinical impact of IEAT on prognosis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Unidade Hospitalar de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Pielonefrite/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA