Long-term outcomes of nasogastric tube with Gastrografin for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: We had previously reported that the administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) followed by long tube (LT) strategy could be a novel standard treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO); however, the long-term outcomes after initial improvement remain unknown. This study aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of first-line NGT-G. METHODS: Enrolled patients with ASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018. Thereafter, the cumulative surgery rate, cumulative recurrence rate, and overall survival (OS) rate were analyzed. In addition, subset analysis was conducted to determine the cumulative recurrence rate according to colonic contrast with Gastrografin at 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed over a median follow-up duration of 550 days. The cumulative 1-year surgery rates, cumulative 1-year recurrence rates, and 1-year OS rates in the LT and NGT-G groups were 18.8% and 18.1%, 30.0% and 31.7%, and 99.1% and 96.6%, respectively; no significant differences were observed between both groups. In the NGT-G group, a negative colonic contrast at 24 h demonstrated a higher tendency for future recurrence compared with a positive colonic contrast at 24 h (1-year recurrence rate: negative contrast, 46.9% vs positive contrast, 27.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube followed by LT can be a promising treatment strategy for ASBO, with long-term efficacies equivalent to initial LT placement.

Optimal definition of coagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic clipping closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) did not reduce the incidence of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) in our recent randomized controlled trial (RCT); however, the definition of PECS is still controversial. The aim of this study is to establish optimal definition of PECS with additional analysis of RCT based on another definition. METHODS: In this multicenter, single-blind RCT, individuals were randomly assigned to colorectal ESD followed by endoscopic clipping closure or non-closure. In this post hoc analysis, the definition of PECS was modified as both localized abdominal pain on visual analogue scale and inflammatory response (fever or leukocytosis), from either localized abdominal pain or inflammatory response in the original study. All participants underwent a computed tomography after ESD, and PECS was classified into type I, conventional PECS without extra-luminal air, and type II, PECS with peri-luminal air. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients (84 in the non-closure group and 71 in the closure group) were analyzed. As a result of criteria modification, 21 type I PECS and four type II PECS cases in the original study, which included patients with clear pain and inflammatory response, were downgraded to no adverse event and simple peri-luminal air, respectively. The frequency of PECS showed no significant difference between non-closure and closure groups. CONCLUSION: Clipping closure after colorectal ESD does not reduce the incidence of PECS regardless of the diagnostic criteria. Either localized abdominal pain or inflammatory response might be optimal criteria of PECS (UMIN000027031). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000027031 DATE OF REGISTRATION: April 18, 2017.

A multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial of endoscopic clipping closure for preventing coagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome (PECS) occasionally occurs after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), presenting with localized abdominal pain and inflammation. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the usefulness of endoscopic clipping closure to prevent PECS and delayed perforation (DP). METHODS: This is a multicenter, single-blind RCT. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing colorectal ESD were randomly allocated to endoscopic clipping closure and nonclosure after ESD, stratifying by institution and tumor size. All participants underwent a computed tomography scan after ESD. PECS was defined as visual analog scale (VAS) ≥30 mm, an increase in VAS ≥20 mm from baseline, body temperature ≥37.5°C or white blood cells ≥10,000/µL after colorectal ESD. DP was defined as PECS accompanied by extraluminal air. The preplanned sample size was 320 patients, and the primary endpoint was the rate of PECS/DP. RESULTS: At the planned interim analysis, this trial was terminated by recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee because conditional power with superiority was lower than the preplanned futility limit. Finally, 155 patients were analyzed. The rate of PECS/DP was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-23%) in the nonclosure group and 24% (95% CI, 14%-34%) in the closure group (P = .184). All cases of DP were within minor criteria, and all PECS/DP patients were managed conservatively without surgical treatment. Simple periluminal air without PECS was observed in 16% (95% CI, 8%-23%) in the nonclosure group and 10% (95% CI, 3%-17%) in the closure group. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic clipping closure could not reduce the high incidence of PECS/DP after colorectal ESD. (University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000027031.).

A multicenter case-control study of self-expanding metallic stent versus trans-anal colorectal tube for stage II/III non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) and trans-anal colorectal tube (TCT) are alternative treatments to conventional emergency surgery for non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer (NROCC). However, the one with better short- and long-term outcomes remains controversial. Thus, this multicenter case-control study aimed to analyze and compare SEMS and TCT for NROCC. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III NROCC who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 at either of the eight selected Japanese affiliate hospitals were, retrospectively, reviewed. Baseline characteristics between the SEMS and TCT groups were adjusted by propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Among 239 reviewed patients (SEMS: 76, TCT: 163), 180 were finally included in two well-balanced cohorts through PS: SEMS group (65 patients) and TCT group (115 patients). Technical success, clinical success, morbidity, and short-term mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. SEMS placement achieved significantly higher rates for primary resection/anastomosis without stoma (SEMS: 90.8% vs. TCT: 77.4%, p < 0.001) and laparoscopic surgery (SEMS: 64.6% vs. TCT: 43.5%, p < 0.001) than TCT placement. However, 5-year overall survival (SEMS: 83.7% vs. TCT: 86.4%; p = 0.822) and 5-year relapse-free survival (SEMS: 64.7% vs. TCT: 66.4%; p = 0.854) showed no significant differences between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both SEMS and TCT revealed similar long-term outcomes, but SEMS placement was better in achieving primary resection/anastomosis and laparoscopic surgery in patients with stage II/III NROCC.

The first management using intubation of a nasogastric tube with Gastrografin enterography or long tube for non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal decompression is generally applied to a non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction (NSASBO). Although long tube (LT) placement and administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) have shown advantages over NGT alone in previous studies, no studies appear to have compared LT and NGT-G. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with NSASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018 at 11 Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT for non-surgery rate, and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the non-surgery rate (-15%) was set as the lower margin for inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT. RESULTS: In total, 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed in the present trial. The non-surgery rate was 87.4% in the LT group and 91.1% in the NGT-G group, with a 3.7% difference between NGT-G and LT (95.3%CI - 5.55 to 12.91; non-inferiority P = 0.00002923). On the other hand, the non-surgery rate with pure NGT-G alone (76.8%) that represents non-cross-over NGT-G without subsequent LT was significantly lower than that with LT (P = 0.039). Median procedure time was significantly shorter with NGT-G (1 min) than with LT (25 min; P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in mortality or hospital stay were noted between groups. CONCLUSION: NGT-G is an effective alternative to LT as a first-line treatment for NSASBO. A sequential strategy comprising NGT-G followed by LT might offer a new standard for NSASBO. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (umin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000022669) prior to the start of this trial.

Refractory gastric antral ulcers without Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Herein, we describe a rare case of refractory gastric antral ulcers. A woman in her 50 s was admitted to Nagoya City University Hospital with epigastric pain after being diagnosed with gastric antral submucosal tumor at another hospital. Findings from esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound examination revealed that the lesion was a gastric ulcer. The patient had no Helicobacter pylori infection and no recent history of using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. On the basis of these findings, we diagnosed this as a case of refractory gastric antral ulcer (RGAU). RGAU is considered a new disease concept and detailed analyses are expected in the future.

Urinary kallikrein 10 predicts the incurability of gastric cancer.

The current imaging modalities are not sufficient to identify inoperable tumor factors, including distant metastasis and local invasion. Hence, we conducted this study using urine samples to discover non-invasive biomarkers for the incurability of gastric cancer (GC). Urine samples from 111 GC patients were analyzed in this study. The GC cohort was categorized and analyzed according to disease stage and operability. In the discovery phase, protease protein array analysis identified 3 potential candidate proteins that were elevated in the urine of advanced GC patients compared to early GC patients. Among them, urinary kallikrein 10 (KLK10) was positively associated with tumor stage progression. Moreover, the urinary level of KLK10 (uKLK10) was significantly elevated in the urine of patients with inoperable GC compared to operable GC patients (median, 118 vs. 229; P=0.014). The combination of uKLK10, tumor location and tumor size distinguished operability of GC with an area under the curve of 0.859, 82.4% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly shorter in GC patients with high uKLK10 compared to those with low uKLK10 (hazard ratio: 3.30 [95% confidence interval, 1.58-6.90] P<0.001). Immunohistochemical analyses also demonstrated a positive correlation between tumor stage and KLK10 expression in GC tissues (r=0.426, P<0.001). In addition, GC patients with high expression of pathological KLK10 (pKLK10) showed a significantly shorter DFS compared to those with low pKLK10 (hazard ratio: 3.79 [95% confidence interval, 1.27-11.24] P=0.010). uKLK10 is a promising non-invasive biomarker for the inoperability and incurability of GC.