Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937713

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of egg allergy through basophil activation testing (BAT) has been mainly performed with an egg white extract or individual egg allergens rather than clinically more representative whole-egg extracts. Impact of heating on whole-egg extract allergenicity remains unassessed.Validating BAT with gradually less heated whole-egg extracts in egg allergy diagnosis and as tolerance marker. METHODS: CD63-based BAT was performed with five progressively less heated extracts from cake, hard-boiled egg, omelet, soft-boiled, and raw egg in 10 egg allergic (EA), 10 complete egg tolerant (ET) and 12 non-egg-sensitized non-allergic (NEA) children. Cutoffs and diagnostic accuracy measures were established through ROC analysis. Changes in basophil response were assessed in 12 baked egg tolerant children undergoing an 8-month gradual egg reintroduction protocol with BAT and oral food challenges prior to each reintroduction step. RESULTS: Basophil responses to all egg extracts were increased in EA, but not in ET and NEA children. Responses decreased progressively with more heated egg extracts. Compared to ET children, EA children showed higher basophil sensitivity for all egg extracts. Negative BAT responses predicted clinical tolerance with a 90-100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and false positive rate of 2.78%. In comparison, egg sIgE's (<0.35 kUA/L) had a lower specificity of 50-78% with a false positive rate of 40%. Basophil reactivity and sensitivity tended to decrease in baked egg tolerant children undergoing gradual egg reintroduction, concurrent with tolerance development. CONCLUSION: BAT with progressively less heated egg preparations is a sensitive and highly specific tool to discriminate EA from ET children.

2.
Front Allergy ; 4: 1111687, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36756279

RESUMO

IgE-mediated food allergy has an estimated prevalence of 6%-10% in developed countries. Allergen avoidance has long been the main focus in the prevention of food allergy and late solid food introduction after 6-12 months of age was recommended in high-risk infants. However, the rising prevalence of food allergy despite delayed exposure to allergens and the observations that IgE-mediated sensitization to food products could even occur before the introduction of solid foods resulted in a shift towards early solid food introduction as an attempt to prevent IgE-mediated food allergy. Since then, many trials focused on the clinical outcome of early allergen introduction and overall seem to point to a protective effect on the development of IgE-mediated food allergies. For non-IgE-mediated diseases of food allergy, evidence of early food introduction seems less clear. Moreover, data on the underlying immunological processes in early food introduction is lacking. The goal of this review is to summarize the available data of immunological changes in early food introduction to prevent IgE and non-IgE mediated food allergy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA