Exploring the current and future osteoarthritis health service delivery needs in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIM: Osteoarthritis (OA) affects the wellbeing of one in 10 people in Aotearoa New Zealand, yet current healthcare delivery for these people is fragmented, un-coordinated and inconsistent. How current and future needs should be addressed has not been systematically explored. This study aimed to describe the views of interested people from the health sector regarding current and future OA health service delivery in the public health system in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHOD: Data were collected via a co-design approach within an interprofessional workshop at the Taupuni Hao Huatau Kaikoiwi: Osteoarthritis Aotearoa New Zealand Basecamp symposium and analysed using direct qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The results highlighted several promising current healthcare delivery initiatives. Health literacy and obesity prevention policies featured in the thematic analysis suggesting a lifespan or systemwide approach is needed. Data highlighted a need for reformed systems that enhances hauora/wellbeing, promotes physical activity, facilitates interprofessional service delivery and collaborates across care settings. CONCLUSION: Participants identified several promising healthcare delivery initiatives for people with OA in Aotearoa New Zealand. Public health policy initiatives are needed to reduce osteoarthritis risk factors. Developing future care pathways should support the diverse needs within Aotearoa New Zealand, coordinate and stratify care, value interprofessional collaboration and practice, and improve health literacy and self-management.

Variability of CPR training requirements among New Zealand health professionals.

AIM: To audit cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and certification requirements of registered healthcare professionals in New Zealand. METHOD: An enquiry-based policy audit of all regulatory bodies under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (HPCA Act 2003), and vocational medical training and recertification providers accredited by the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ). RESULTS: All the organisations approached (n=37) responded to the audit. Six of the 17 health professional regulatory bodies have some form of mandatory CPR certification requirement for initial registration, ongoing registration, or continuing professional development. The Midwifery Council, Dentistry Council, Podiatrists Board, and Pharmacy Council have the most comprehensive requirements. Twelve of the 20 vocational medical colleges specify some form of CPR training. The Royal New Zealand College of Urgent Care is the only one to require annual re-certification. CONCLUSION: This audit revealed a wide variety of CPR training and certification requirements across health professions in New Zealand. Future studies should investigate whether mandating CPR training improves outcomes from cardiac arrest and consider patient, public, and whanau expectations regarding the ongoing certification of healthcare professionals in resuscitation and emergency care.

Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?

BACKGROUND: Conservative, first-line treatments (exercise, education and weight-loss if appropriate) for hip and knee joint osteoarthritis are underused despite the known benefits. Clinicians' beliefs can affect the advice and education given to patients, in turn, this can influence the uptake of treatment. In New Zealand, most conservative OA management is prescribed by general practitioners (GPs; primary care physicians) and physiotherapists. Few questionnaires have been designed to measure GPs' and physiotherapists' osteoarthritis-related health, illness and treatment beliefs. This study aimed to identify if a questionnaire about low back pain beliefs, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT), can be adapted to assess GP and physiotherapists' beliefs about osteoarthritis. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional observational design. Data were collected anonymously from GPs and physiotherapists using an online survey. The survey included a study-specific demographic and occupational characteristics questionnaire and the PABS-PT questionnaire adapted for osteoarthritis. All data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the PABS-PT data underwent principal factor analysis. RESULTS: In total, 295 clinicians (87 GPs, 208 physiotherapists) participated in this study. The principal factor analysis identified two factors or subscales (categorised as biomedical and behavioural), with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The biomedical subscale of the PABS-PT appears appropriate for adaptation for use in the context of osteoarthritis, but the low internal consistency of the behavioural subscale suggests this subscale is not currently suitable. Future research should consider the inclusion of additional items to the behavioural subscale to improve internal consistency or look to develop a new, osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was part of the primary author's PhD, which began in 2012 and therefore this study was not registered.