Opioid Prescribing Practices Among Plastic Surgeons: Results of the 2019 American Society of Plastic Surgeons Opioid Survey.

BACKGROUND: Health care providers play an important role in the national opioid crisis with 40% of opioid-related deaths being attributed to prescription medications (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2018) and as many as half of the opioid pills prescribed after outpatient plastic surgery may go unused (Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:929-938). The purpose of this study was to provide broad foundational data regarding postoperative analgesic prescribing patterns among members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) to facilitate inclusion of opioid data fields in the ASPS Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons database for longitudinal evaluation. METHODS: A survey regarding opioid prescribing practices was electronically distributed to a representative cohort of 2555 ASPS members. Two hundred seventy-nine responses (11% response rate) were received. RESULTS: The majority of respondents reported prescribing opioids following 1 or more types of cosmetic and reconstructive procedures (90.2% and 81.7%, respectively; p = 0.0057), most commonly oxycodone and hydrocodone. Most (61.9%) reported less than 5% of patients request an opioid refill. Nonopioid medications, most commonly acetaminophen and ibuprofen/naproxen, were also prescribed but less commonly so for cosmetic (80.7-85.8%) than reconstructive (86.3-91.5%) procedures. Local anesthetic was less commonly used for mastopexy (83.7%) than augmentation (91.8%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Based on survey responses, potential areas of improvement to reduce opioid prescribing and use include provider education on the use of multimodal pain regimens including nonopioid medication and "as needed" rather than scheduled dosing, use of local anesthetic blocks, as well as patient education on opioid safety and proper disposal of unused medication.

Analgesic Efficacy of Intraoperative Nerve Blocks for Primary Palatoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cleft palate is a common craniofacial malformation, requiring surgical repair in late infancy or early toddlerhood. Postoperative use of opioids is common to mitigate pain following palatoplasty. To decrease opioid consumption, improve postoperative pain, and decrease complications associated with general anesthetics, intraoperative regional nerve blocks have been employed for multimodal pain relief. While the literature supports intraoperative nerve block use for postprocedural comfort in children undergoing palatoplasty, the topic has not been systematically summarized. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to explore the efficacy of nerve block in palatoplasty, in addition to analyzing trends in nerve block modality and choice of local anesthetic on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies on cleft palate nerve block. Resulting reference lists were searched for potential eligible studies and then reviewed, with an emphasis on pain scores, postoperative analgesia consumption, and time to analgesia use. RESULTS: A total of 259 articles were reviewed, of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Intraoperative suprazygomatic and greater palatine nerve blocks were the 2 most commonly reported blocks. Long acting agents, such as bupivacaine and ropivacaine, were the local anesthetic of choice. All modalities were effective in reducing postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative nerve blocks have been shown to be incredibly effective in reducing postoperative pain in children undergoing palatoplasty, minimizing both opioid consumption and recovery time. The existing literature suggests that suprazygomatic block with combined bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine is the preferred nerve block modality. Ultrasound guidance should be used when accessible.Level of Evidence: 2.

Is Thoracodorsal Nerve Transection Needed in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction?

PURPOSE: Latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction is of proven efficacy. Advantages of thoracodorsal nerve transection are potential prevention of muscle spasticity/movement; disadvantages are possible long-term muscle atrophy and volume loss. This study's purpose is to provide data that would support or refute nerve transection. METHODS: A retrospective study of all LD breast reconstruction patients from 2011 to 2017 was done. Total number of flaps was identified, as was thoracodorsal nerve transection. Outcomes were noted for symptomatic muscle spasticity/involuntary movement, and complications inclusive of hematoma, seroma, and capsular contracture. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients had 170 flaps. Eighty-one flaps had nerve transection; 89 did not. These cohorts had no differences in comorbidities, indications of surgery (cancer vs prophylactic), irradiation, delayed/immediate reconstruction, and use of expanders. Symptomatic muscle movement/spasticity was not significantly different: 3 (3.7%) of 78 in transection and 5 (5.6%) of 84 in nontransection (P = 0.55, χ). Incidence of seroma in the transection group was notably higher (18/81; 22% vs 12%) but not statistically significant (P = 0.09, χ). No differences existed in all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic spasticity or involuntary muscle movement occurs in a small number of patients with LD breast reconstruction and is not affected by thoracodorsal nerve transection. Movement after transection is likely due to aberrant nerve innervation and reinnervation. The absence of movement without transection is due to disruption of muscle position and origin after transfer. Seroma formation may be affected by increased axillary dissection required for nerve transection. These data do not support nerve transection, and therefore, it is not recommended.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint.

This review discusses the anatomy and biomechanics of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. This articulation between the trapezium and first metacarpal is integral for opposition and other complex movements necessary for pinch and grasp maneuvers. Fortunately, this joint is well equipped to handle the extreme forces imposed by these movements, as it is stabilized by an elaborate arrangement of ligaments and muscles. Without this stability, thumb subluxation would occur with loading during pinch and grasp, and human prehension would be impossible. Understanding the interactions occurring within this joint is essential for adequately treating pathology arising in this crucial joint.

Understanding Patient Expectations and Determinants of Satisfaction in an Outpatient Urology Clinic at an Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: To examine and better understand expectations and facilitators of satisfaction amongst patients presenting to an ambulatory urology clinic at an academic medical center. METHODS: Patients completed an anonymous survey regarding expectations for their clinic visit. Patients were included in the investigation if they were aged 18-89 years and had the ability to complete informed consent. Chi-square analysis was then used to analyze the collected data. RESULTS: A total of five hundred patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were predominantly white males and were older than 60 years of age. Most patients had at least a college education and drew an annual household income between $40,000-$99,999. Most enrollees were return patients (74.8%). Most expected to be seen within 3-7 days of referral and expected 16-30 minutes with their provider. Patients noted they would not be equally satisfied seeing a physician vs advanced practice provider on their initial visit but would on a return visit. About half (52%) of the cohort stated they would be dissatisfied with their clinic experience if their expectations were not met. Significance was found between variables including age, race, gender and type of visit and their survey responses. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction remains an important measure for the quality and safety of patient care. This investigation highlighted patient prioritization of time to be seen after referral and the provider that cares for them at both initial and follow-up visits. Future research is needed to enhance stakeholder understanding of precisely how expectations impact overall satisfaction.

Supine harvest of vascularised scapular bone grafts-Anatomical study and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: We report our findings from an anatomical study on harvest of a vascularized scapular bone graft from a supine position. A clinical case is presented to illustrate the operative approach. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric hemibody specimens were dissected in the supine position. Outcomes of interest included the characterization of anatomical variants and measurements of pedicle length. Specific measurements included distance from the origin of the subscapular artery (at the axillary artery) to the branch point of the angular artery from the thoracodorsal artery or serratus branch and the length of the angular branch proper. RESULTS: There are five reported anatomic variations regarding the origin of the angular branch of the thoracodorsal artery. In our cadaveric cohort only four known types were seen, and an entirely new variant was encountered. Six cadaveric dissections exhibited a type 3 configuration, six were type 1, four were type 2, three were type 4, and one was a previously unreported variant we termed a type 6, with multiple angular artery branches originating from the posterior branch of the thoracodorsal. The mean distance between the origin of the subscapular artery and the takeoff of the angular branch was 6.3 ± 2.0 cm. The mean length of the angular branch was 3.7 ± 1.4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Supine positioning for harvest of a vascularized bone graft obviates the need for an intraoperative position change and allows reconstruction of bone defects in the hand and upper extremity within a single surgical field.

Objective Comparison of Donor-Site Morbidity following Full and Thoracodorsal Nerve-Preserving Split Latissimus Dorsi Flaps.

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi flap is a workhorse for reconstruction. However, flap harvest has been variably reported to result in donor-site morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare donor-site morbidity following harvest of a split latissimus dorsi flap, preserving the anterior branch of the thoracodorsal nerve, and a traditional nerve-sacrificing full latissimus dorsi flap. METHODS: Patients who underwent split or full latissimus dorsi flaps between July of 2017 and August of 2020 at a single center were recalled for assessment. Donor-site morbidity in the shoulder was evaluated through the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. Medical Research Council strength grading was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients in the split latissimus dorsi cohort and 22 patients in the full latissimus dorsi cohort were recalled. Patient-reported outcomes as assessed through the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire scores revealed statistically greater (p < 0.05) donor-site morbidity associated with the traditional compared to split latissimus dorsi flap. Seven patients in the full latissimus dorsi cohort had less than Medical Research Council grade 5 power at the shoulder, whereas all patients in the split latissimus dorsi cohort demonstrated full power at the shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional full latissimus dorsi flaps were found to result in greater donor-site morbidity compared to thoracodorsal nerve-preserving split latissimus dorsi flaps. Split latissimus dorsi flaps may be beneficial in preserving donor-site function and strength. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.