Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Acta Radiol ; 62(3): 388-393, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32438875

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spondylolisthesis is often misdiagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the slip may reduce to a normal alignment when the patient lies supine. Often, disc herniation is reported at the level of spondylolisthesis. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence rates of disc herniation at the level of spondylolisthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study included 258 consecutive patients with spondylolisthesis who had lumbar spine MRI. The archived reports were collectively put in Group 1. A musculoskeletal radiologist and a spine surgeon reviewed the imaging studies together. Their readings were referred to as Group 2. The findings of both groups were compared to evaluate whether disc herniation was overreported. RESULTS: Group 1 reported findings of true disc herniation in 112 (41.6%) cases and pseudo disc herniation or no findings of disc herniation at the level of spondylolisthesis in 157 (58.4%) cases. Group 2 reported findings of a true disc herniation in 25 (9.3%) cases and pseudo disc herniation or no findings of disc herniation in the remaining 244 (90.7%) cases. There was a statistically significant difference in the reporting rates between these two groups (P < 0.02). The most overreported finding was the disc bulging (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The current study showed overreporting of disc herniation in lumbar spine MRI scans performed for patients with established spondylolisthesis. The majority of disc pathology at the level of spondylolisthesis are pseudo disc rather than a true disc herniation. An accurate diagnosis is vital in planning surgical intervention.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Espondilolistese/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Acta Oncol ; 57(3): 426-430, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy and non-detection rate of cancer related findings (CRFs) on follow-up non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) versus contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images of the abdomen in patients with a known cancer diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 352 consecutive CTs of the abdomen performed with and without IV contrast between March 2010 and October 2014 for follow-up of cancer was included. Two radiologists independently assessed the NECT portions of the studies. The reader was provided the primary cancer diagnosis and access to the most recent prior NECT study. The accuracy and non-detection rates were determined by comparing our results to the archived reports as a gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 383 CRFs were found in the archived reports of the 352 abdominal CTs. The average non-detection rate for the NECTs compared to the CECTs was 3.0% (11.5/383) with an accuracy of 97.0% (371.5/383) in identifying CRFs. The most common findings missed were vascular thrombosis with a non-detection rate of 100%. The accuracy for non-vascular CRFs was 99.1%. CONCLUSION: Follow-up NECT abdomen studies are highly accurate in the detection of CRFs in patients with an established cancer diagnosis, except in cases where vascular involvement is suspected.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Neoplásica/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Abdominais/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Acta Radiol ; 59(7): 861-868, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28952779

RESUMO

Background Injection of cement during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty can leak into surrounding structures and could be symptomatic. Purpose To identify the sites and incidence of cement extravasation after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty, and to evaluate their impacts on clinical outcomes. Material and Methods A retrospective review of 316 patients treated with kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty; 411 cases were included (223 kyphoplasty and 188 vertebroplasty). Cement extravasation was evaluated postoperatively by computed tomography (CT) scan of the spine. Clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of cement extravasation between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups ( P < 0.04). The most common site of cement extravasation was in paravertebral soft tissues for vertebroplasty (n = 33, 40.7%) and for kyphoplasty (n = 30, 30%). In the subgroup where cement leaked into the intradiscal space, adjacent vertebral body fractures occurred in 3/26 vertebrae (11.5%) in the vertebroplasty group and in 2/18 vertebrae (11.1%) in the kyphoplasty group. Both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in both VAS ( P < 0.001) and ODI scores ( P < 0.001). There was no significantly difference in patient satisfaction between those who had cement extravasation and those who did not, in both groups. Conclusion Kyphoplasty has an advantage in terms of less risk of cement extravasation. However, this factor did not reflect on subsequent sequelae or final clinical outcomes. This study did not find a distinct correlation between intradiscal cement extravasation and increased risk of adjacent vertebral fractures.


Assuntos
Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cifoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Vertebroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
BJR Open ; 2(1): 20200008, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33364545

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Tc99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) has been used for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the detection of ischemia. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of effectively evaluating cystic duct patency, during routine visual analysis of the raw MPI and/or with the three-dimensional reconstructed data. METHODS: A retrospective investigation of 91 patients undergoing cardiac MIBI scan for acute chest pain and hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) was performed, within no more than 3 months for suspected gallbladder obstructive disease. Gallbladder visualization during either the stress or rest portion of the MIBI was indicative of cystic duct patency. These results were compared to those by the HBS studies. RESULTS: Ten patients had the MIBI and HBS 4 days apart, both analyses concurred 100% with the diagnosis of cystic duct patency. 16 patients had both examinations between 4 days and 3 weeks and had an agreement of 87.5% with cystic duct patency. 65 patients had both tests 3 weeks to 3 months apart and had an agreement of 84.6% with cystic duct patency. CONCLUSION: The initial results of this study indicate that MPI with Tc99m MIBI is useful in detecting a patent cystic duct, above all in the setting of acute gallbladder pathology. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In this article, we introduce a novel method to diagnose cystic duct patency in the acute setting thus effectively ruling out acute cholecystitis, during MPI. Our method can potentially improve patient outcomes by reducing the volume of imaging needed to exclude a diagnosis of acute gallbladder pathology. This in turn, keeps in line with decreasing the cost for the patient, leading to a more sound value-based care.

5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 40(18): 1436-43, 2015 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076439

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients undergoing lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low back pain at a single institution. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and nondetection rate of incidental extraspinal findings (IESFs) in adult patients undergoing MRI of the lumbar spine performed for low back pain by using a structured approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Extraspinal findings are depicted on lumbar spine magnetic resonance image. There is limited evidence concerning their prevalence, importance, how often they are missed by interpreting physician, and how to improve their detection. METHODS: Our study was approved by our institutional review board committee, which waived informed consent because it was retrospective. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance images obtained for low back pain at our institution from January 2011 to December 2013 were assessed by 3 readers for IESFs using a structured approach and their results compared with the archived reports. Repeat lumbar spine MRI and cases with a history of trauma were excluded. A total of 3024 lumbar spine magnetic resonance images were included. IESFs were classified according to the organ involved and to the model adopted by the modified CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). Nondetection rates were determined by comparing the results of our structured approach with the archived MRI reports. RESULTS: A total of 859 IESFs were found in 671 of 3024 lumbar spine patients undergoing MRI (22%). A total of 623 out of them (73%) were categorized E2 (clinically unimportant finding), 192 (22%) were categorized E3 (likely unimportant finding), and 44 (5%) were categorized E4 (potentially important finding). A total of 347 of 859 findings were not mentioned in the archived reports for a nondetection rate of 40%. The nondetection rate for E4 category findings was 38.6% (17/44). CONCLUSION: IESFs on lumbar spine MRI are common with a significant nondetection rate of 40% using a nonstructured approach. Specifically, there was a significant nondetection rate of 38.6% for potentially important (E4) findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
Achados Incidentais , Dor Lombar/patologia , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA