OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Pancreas.

In 2017, 1492 patients were added to the pancreas transplant waiting list, 964 listed as active, a slight increase from 2016. This is significant because for the first time in the past decade, the steady downward trend in additions to the waiting list has been reversed. Proportions of pancreas donors with cerebrovascular accident as cause of death decreased, with a concomitant increase in proportions with anoxia and head trauma. This is partly a result of the national opioid crisis, and it reflects increasing use of younger donors for pancreas transplant. The 2017 outcome report remains compromised by previous variation in reporting graft failure. Although the OPTN Pancreas Transplantation Committee has approved more precise definitions of pancreas graft failure, implementation of these definitions took place recently, and the data are not reflected in this report.

Impact of ureteral stricture and treatment choice on long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation.

We aimed to evaluate the influence of urological complications occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation on long-term patient and graft outcomes, and sought to examine the impact of the management approach of ureteral strictures on long-term graft function. We collected data on urological complications occurring within the first year posttransplant. Graft survivals, patient survival, and rejection rates were compared between recipients with and without urological complications. Male gender of the recipient, delayed graft function, and donor age were found to be significant risk factors for urological complications after kidney transplantation (P < .05). Death censored graft survival analysis showed that only ureteral strictures had a negative impact on long-term graft survival (P = .0009) compared to other complications. Death censored graft survival was significantly shorter in kidney recipients managed initially with minimally invasive approach when compared to the recipients with no stricture (P = .001). However, graft survival was not statistically different in patients managed initially with open surgery (P = .47). Ureteral strictures following kidney transplantation appear to be strongly negatively correlated with long-term graft survival. Our analysis suggests that kidney recipients with ureteral stricture should be managed initially with open surgery, with better long-term graft survival.

Laparoscopic Biopsies in Pancreas Transplantation.

As there is no precise laboratory test or imaging study for detection of pancreas allograft rejection, there is increasing interest in obtaining pancreas tissue for diagnosis. Pancreas allograft biopsies are most commonly performed percutaneously, transcystoscopically, or endoscopically, yet pancreas transplant surgeons often lack the skills to perform these types of biopsies. We have performed 160 laparoscopic pancreas biopsies in 95 patients. There were 146 simultaneous kidney-pancreas biopsies and 14 pancreas-only biopsies due to pancreas alone, kidney loss, or extraperitoneal kidney. Biopsies were performed for graft dysfunction (89) or per protocol (71). In 13 cases, an additional laparoscopic procedure was performed at the same operation. The pancreas diagnostic tissue yield was 91.2%; however, the pancreas could not be visualized in eight cases (5%) and in 6 cases the tissue sample was nondiagnostic (3.8%). The kidney tissue yield was 98.6%. There were four patients with intraoperative complications requiring laparotomy (2.5%) with two additional postoperative complications. Half of all these complications were kidney related. There were no episodes of pancreatic enzyme leak and there were no graft losses related to the procedure. We conclude that laparoscopic kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies can be safely performed with very high tissue yields.

Pancreas Transplantation: An Alarming Crisis in Confidence.

In the past decade, the annual number of pancreas transplantations performed in the United States has steadily declined. From 2004 to 2011, the overall number of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations in the United States declined by 10%, whereas the decreases in pancreas after kidney (PAK) and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) procedures were 55% and 34%, respectively. Paradoxically, this has occurred in the setting of improvements in graft and patient survival outcomes and transplanting higher-risk patients. Only 11 centers in the United States currently perform ≥20 pancreas transplantations per year, and most centers perform <5 pancreas transplantations annually; many do not perform PAKs or PTAs. This national trend in decreasing numbers of pancreas transplantations is related to a number of factors including lack of a primary referral source, improvements in diabetes care and management, changing donor and recipient considerations, inadequate training opportunities, and increasing risk aversion because of regulatory scrutiny. A national initiative is needed to "reinvigorate" SPK and PAK procedures as preferred transplantation options for appropriately selected uremic patients taking insulin regardless of C-peptide levels or "type" of diabetes. Moreover, many patients may benefit from PTAs because all categories of pancreas transplantation are not only life enhancing but also life extending procedures.

Acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft: incidence, risk factors and outcomes.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after pancreas transplantation is a recently identified entity. We describe the incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes after AMR, and the correlation of C4d immunostaining and donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the diagnosis of AMR. We retrospectively analyzed 162 pancreas transplants in 159 patients who underwent 94 pancreas allograft biopsies between 2006 and 2009. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for pancreas graft AMR. One-year rejection rates and survival after rejection were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. AMR occurred in 10% of patients by 1-year posttransplant. Multivariate risk factors identified for AMR include nonprimary simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant, primary solitary pancreas (PAN) transplant and race mismatch. After pancreas rejection, patient survival was 100% but 20% (8 of 41) of pancreas grafts failed within 1 year. Graft survival after acute cellular rejection (ACR), AMR and mixed rejection was similar. Of biopsies that stained >5% C4d, 80% were associated with increased Class I DSA. In summary, AMR occurs at a measurable rate after pancreas transplantation, and the diagnosis should be actively sought using C4d staining and DSA levels in patients with graft dysfunction, especially after nonprimary SPK and primary PAN transplantation.

A comparison of alemtuzumab with basiliximab induction in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Alemtuzumab is a humanized, rat monoclonal antibody directed against the CD52 antigen. After binding, alemtuzumab causes profound and durable depletion and has been successfully used as immune induction therapy for organ transplantation. This was a single center, retrospective review of patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation at the University of Wisconsin using alemtuzumab induction therapy compared with historical controls that received induction with basiliximab. There were no differences in donor or recipient demographics, rates of patient survival, renal or pancreas allograft survival, renal allograft delayed graft function, EBV infection, BKV infection, PTLD or sepsis. There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the alemtuzumab-treated group. Given the significantly higher incidence of CMV infections, we have since altered our induction protocol to consist of a single 30 mg dose of alemtuzumab instead of two doses. The long-term effects of this change remain to be seen. Due to the results seen in this study, the low initial cost of the drug and the absence of any severe, short-term side effects, alemtuzumab has been selected as the induction drug of choice at our center for patients undergoing SPK.

Kidney function after solitary pancreas transplantation.

Preserving kidney function in patients after solitary pancreas transplantation (SPTx) is an important consideration, yet various factors may negatively impact long-term function of the native kidneys or kidney allograft. To determine changes in kidney function over time in a series of patients receiving SPTx, we conducted a retrospective analysis and tracked changes in serum creatinine (SCr) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to 6 months, 1 year, or 3 years after SPTx in a series of pancreas after kidney transplants PAK; (n = 61) and pancreas transplants alone PTA; (n = 27) performed at our institution. The mean follow-up for the PAK and PTA groups was 3.4 and 2.7 years, respectively. In this series, 8% of patients after SPTx developed significant kidney failure, defined by either initiation of dialysis or receiving a kidney transplant (PAK-6, PTA-1). Twenty seven percent of SPTx patients with a baseline GFR < 60 suffered either an elevated SCr > 2.2, dialysis, or kidney transplant, whereas no patients with a baseline GFR > 60 developed significant kidney dysfunction. In the PAK group, the GFR did not show significant deterioration over time. In contrast to relatively stable kidney function in PAK patients, PTA patients experienced overall significantly greater rates of decline over time. GFR in PTA patients decreased from 78 +/- 19 (40 to 114) mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 65 +/- 20 at 1 year (P = .006), while SCr increased from 1.03 +/- 0.25 mg/dL to 1.28 +/- 0.43 over the same time period (P = .012). These data show that kidney function may deteriorate after SPTx and proper patient selection may reduce the frequency of this complication.

Broadened Allocation of Pancreas Transplants Across Compatible ABO Blood Types.

BACKGROUND: Current Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy restricts certain blood type-compatible simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants. Using the Kidney Pancreas Simulated Allocation Model, we examined the effects of 5 alternative allocation sequences that allowed all clinically compatible ABO transplants. METHODS: The study cohort included kidney (KI), SPK, and pancreas alone (PA) candidates waiting for transplant for at least 1 day between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010 (full cohort), and kidneys and pancreata recovered for transplant during the same period. Additionally, because the waiting list has shrunk since 2010, the study population was reduced by random sampling to match the volume of the 2015 waiting list (reduced cohort). RESULTS: Compared with the current allocation sequence, R4 and R5 both showed an increase in SPK transplants, a nearly corresponding decrease in KI transplants, and virtually no change in PA transplants. Life-years from transplant and median years of benefit also increased. The distribution of transplants by blood type changed, with more ABO:A, B, and AB transplants performed, and fewer ABO:O across all transplant types (KI, SPK, PA), with the relative percent changes largest for SPK. DISCUSSION: Broadened ABO compatibility allowances primarily benefitted SPK ABO:A and AB candidates. ABO:O candidates saw potentially reduced access to transplant. The simulation results suggest that modifying the current allocation sequence to incorporate broadened ABO compatibility can result in an increase in annual SPK transplants.

Modulation of human allogeneic and syngeneic pluripotent stem cells and immunological implications for transplantation.

Tissues derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are a promising source of cells for building various regenerative medicine therapies; from simply transplanting cells to reseeding decellularized organs to reconstructing multicellular tissues. Although reprogramming strategies for producing iPSCs have improved, the clinical use of iPSCs is limited by the presence of unique human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, the main immunologic barrier to transplantation. In order to overcome the immunological hurdles associated with allogeneic tissues and organs, the generation of patient-histocompatible iPSCs (autologous or HLA-matched cells) provides an attractive platform for personalized medicine. However, concerns have been raised as to the fitness, safety and immunogenicity of iPSC derivatives because of variable differentiation potential of different lines and the identification of genetic and epigenetic aberrations that can occur during the reprogramming process. In addition, significant cost and regulatory barriers may deter commercialization of patient specific therapies in the short-term. Nonetheless, recent studies provide some evidence of immunological benefit for using autologous iPSCs. Yet, more studies are needed to evaluate the immunogenicity of various autologous and allogeneic human iPSC-derived cell types as well as test various methods to abrogate rejection. Here, we present perspectives of using allogeneic vs. autologous iPSCs for transplantation therapies and the advantages and disadvantages of each related to differentiation potential, immunogenicity, genetic stability and tumorigenicity. We also review the current literature on the immunogenicity of syngeneic iPSCs and discuss evidence that questions the feasibility of HLA-matched iPSC banks. Finally, we will discuss emerging methods of abrogating or reducing host immune responses to PSC derivatives.

Promotion of pancreatic islet allograft survival by intrathymic transplantation of bone marrow.

An important goal in the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes by pancreatic islet transplantation is the development of strategies that allow permanent survival of islet allografts without continuous host immunosuppression. In this study, we demonstrate that inoculation of allogeneic bone marrow into the thymus of adult rats treated with a single dose of anti-lymphocyte serum induces an unresponsive state that permits survival of subsequent pancreatic islet allografts transplanted to an extrathymic site. This effect is donor specific, cannot be reproduced by systemic administration of bone marrow, and is associated with persistence of chimeric cells in the thymus of the recipient. In addition, lymph node cells from long-term recipients of intrathymic bone marrow display markedly reduced proliferative responses to donor alloantigens in mixed lymphocyte culture. Interaction of maturing thymocytes with foreign alloantigens may produce the unresponsiveness. This model offers a potential approach for establishing donor-specific allograft acceptance in adult recipients.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreas Rejection.

Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection of the pancreas remains a major clinical problem. In addition to cellular rejection of the pancreas, antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas is now a well-described entity. The 2011 Banff update established comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of acute and chronic AMR. The pancreas biopsy is critical in order to accurately diagnose and treat pancreas rejection. Other modes of monitoring pancreas rejection we feel are neither sensitive nor specific enough. In this review, we examine recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreas rejection as well as describe practical diagnostic and treatment algorithms.

Human embryonic stem cell and embryonic germ cell lines.

Undifferentiated human embryonic stem (ES) cells and embryonic germ (EG) cells can be cultured indefinitely and yet maintain the potential to form many or all of the differentiated cells in the body. Human ES and EG cells provide an exciting new model for understanding the differentiation and function of human tissue, offer new strategies for drug discovery and testing, and promise new therapies based on the transplantation of ES and EG cell-derived tissues.

Fas-mediated cytotoxicity is not required for rejection of murine nonvascularized heterotopic cardiac allografts.

BACKGROUND: Using mice with loss-of-function mutations in the Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) genes (lpr and gld, respectively) in transplantation experiments has resulted in contradictory findings concerning the role of Fas/FasL-mediated cytotoxicity in allograft rejection. The observation that these mutant mice develop an abnormal lymphocyte phenotype with increasing age that is hyporesponsive in vitro led us to examine the possibility that this characteristic might explain seemingly discordant observations in the literature. Therefore, to distinguish between the effects of Fas/FasL pathway disruption and the effects of immune senescence on in vivo cytotoxicity and allograft rejection, we evaluated the survival of cardiac allografts in gld, lpr, and wild-type mice of varying ages. METHODS: Six- to 21-week-old C3H, C3H/HeJ-Fasl(gld), C57B1/6, and B6.MRL-Fas(lpr) recipients were transplanted with heterotopic, nonvascularized cardiac allografts from neonatal Balb/c, C3H, C57Bl/6, and B6.MRL-Fas(lpr) donors. Mixed lymphocyte reactions were performed in naive gld, lpr, and wild-type animals, 6 and 12 weeks of age. Rejected allografts in gld, lpr, and wild-type recipients and functioning syngeneic transplants were evaluated for intragraft apoptosis by a DNA fragmentation detection assay. RESULTS: Graft survival was not significantly different between 6-week-old gld and lpr recipients and their respective wild-type controls. However, allograft rejection was delayed significantly in older (13-week) gld mice compared with age-matched wild-type mice (P=0.02) or young (6-week) gld animals (P=0.04). Similarly, 21-week-old lpr mice exhibited prolonged graft survival compared with 6-week-old lpr animals (P=0.01). Reduced alloreactive proliferative responses in 12-week-old gld and lpr mice were observed when compared with age-matched wild-type strains. Rejecting allografts displayed a similar level of intragraft apoptotic cells regardless of mutant or wild-type phenotype or age of recipient. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm that Fas/FasL-mediated cytotoxicity is not required for murine cardiac allograft rejection. Our findings also demonstrate that the observed delayed graft rejection in lpr and gld mice is a consequence of an age-related alteration of the immune system, specific to gld and lpr mice and associated with an in vivo and in vitro hyporeactivity to alloantigens.

Promotion of rat cardiac allograft survival by intrathymic inoculation of donor splenocytes.

Donor-specific unresponsiveness to LEW heterotopic cardiac allografts was induced in WF rats following intrathymic inoculation of LEW splenocytes in conjunction with a single intraperitoneal dose of antilymphocyte serum. In contrast, LEW cardiac allografts were promptly rejected in WF recipients pretreated with an intravenous inoculation of donor splenocytes. Without transient immunosuppression with antilymphocyte serum neither intrathymic nor intravenous inoculation of splenocytes led to allograft survival. Substitution of antilymphocyte serum by a short course of cyclosporine did not permit allograft survival, suggesting that a T-cell-depleting regimen is crucial to tolerance induction by this protocol. The unresponsive state could be transferred to secondary syngeneic hosts by spleen cells from long-term recipients of intrathymic splenocytes and cardiac allografts but not by spleen cells from recipients of intrathymic splenocytes alone. This suggests that persistence of donor alloantigen from the graft is necessary for maintenance of the tolerant state. The unresponsive state after intrathymic inoculation of allogeneic splenocytes may be mediated through interaction of maturing host thymocytes with donor alloantigen.

Deletion of donor-reactive T lymphocytes in adult mice after intrathymic inoculation with lymphoid cells.

Clonal deletion of self antigen-reactive T lymphocytes is known to be a dominant mechanism of tolerance induction in the normal immune system. This report considers whether deletion of antigen-reactive T cells is also the immunologic basis for the recently described model of transplantation tolerance that follows intrathymic inoculation with allogeneic lymphoid cells. We found that the outcome of injecting Mlsa- hosts with lymphocytes from Mlsa+ donors was depletion of V beta 6+ T cells (which are known to be reactive with the Mlsa superantigen). The process was found to be specific in that a similar reduction was not seen in an irrelevant T cell population (V beta 8+) in IT injected hosts. Deletion was observed in this model only if immunosuppression with ALS or anti-CD4 accompanied intrathymic injection. When the inoculum of allogeneic lymphocytes was administered intravenously instead of intrathymically only minimal deletion was observed. The induction of transplantation tolerance by intrathymic injection of donor lymphoid cells may prove especially efficacious since it relies on deletion of only those T cells specifically reactive to donor antigens, a process analogous to tolerance induction to self antigens.

Prolonged survival of rat orthotopic liver allografts after intrathymic inoculation of donor-strain cells.

Permanent donor-specific tolerance to tissue or organ allografts can be readily achieved without immunosuppression by administration of donor lymphohematopoietic cells to neonatal rodents. In adult recipients, however, induction of transplantation tolerance by this strategy generally requires intensive cytoablative conditioning of the recipient. We have now demonstrated that intrathymic inoculation of donor bone marrow or hepatic cells in conjunction with a single dose of antilymphocyte serum is effective in prolonging survival of DA rat orthotopic liver allografts in LEW strain recipients, which ordinarily rapidly reject such transplants. The unresponsive state achieved is donor-specific, as evidenced by the failure of intrathymic inocula of third-party WF cells to promote survival of LEW recipients of orthotopic DA liver allografts. Moreover, intravenous administration of the donor cells fails to extend liver allograft survival, demonstrating that the inoculum must be present in the thymus to promote unresponsiveness. Established DA liver allografts induced a state of systemic tolerance in LEW hosts, allowing their subsequent acceptance of donor-strain skin allografts. We hypothesize that the unresponsive state achieved by intrathymic inoculation of donor cells may result from the deletion or functional inactivation of alloreactive clones in a thymus bearing donor alloantigens. In this regard, cells of the macrophage/dendritic lineage (descendants of the bone marrow inoculum or hepatic Kupffer cells) may play a critical role by promoting thymic microchimerism and exerting modulatory effect on T cell development.

A study comparing mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cell-Cept) is a potent and selective inhibitor of B and T lymphocyte proliferation that has proven effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients in several randomized, blinded clinical studies. Because the frequency and characteristics of rejection episodes may be different and more severe after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, we hypothesized that MMF would have a significant impact on pancreas-kidney rejection and graft outcome. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of MMF versus azathioprine (AZA) in cyclosporine-treated simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of 358 consecutive primary SPK transplantations performed from 1990 to 1997 was conducted. Patients received either MMF (n=109, 3 g/day) or AZA (n=249, 2 mg/kg q.d.) in combination with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. All patients received a quadruple-drug sequential induction protocol with either OKT3 or Atgam. Several outcome parameters, including patient and graft survival rates and frequency of rejection, were analyzed. RESULTS: MMF-treated patients demonstrated a markedly reduced rate of biopsy-proven kidney rejection (31 vs. 75% AZA, P=0.0001), clinically significant pancreas rejection (7 vs. 24% AZA; P=0.003), and steroid-refractory rejection (15 vs. 52% AZA; P=0.01). As a result, kidney and pancreas allograft survival was significantly better in MMF patients compared with AZA patients (2-year survival rates: kidney, 95 vs. 86%; and pancreas, 95 vs. 83%). Although surgical infections after transplantation were more frequent in MMF patients, MMF patients were more likely to have undergone enteric drainage. Importantly, we did not observe an increased incidence of any of the bacterial, fungal, or viral infections that typically plague immunosuppressed transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates that MMF is a highly effective immunosuppressant in SPK transplantation. It is not associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections when a balanced immunosuppressive management approach is used. MMF strikingly reduces the frequency of acute cellular and steroid-resistant rejection. As a result of this combined experience, it is not unexpected then that we observe significantly improved graft survival rates in MMF-treated SPK patients compared with patients receiving a more traditional immunosuppressive regimen.

The influence of native nephrectomy on the incidence of recurrent disease following renal transplantation for primary glomerulonephritis.

Factors influencing the incidence of recurrent glomerulonephritis following renal transplantation are poorly understood. Bilateral pretransplant native nephrectomy has been advocated to reduce the likelihood of recurrence after renal transplant. However, there is significant morbidity of native nephrectomy in the uremic population. Therefore, we sought to determine the effect of pretransplant native nephrectomy on the incidence of recurrent primary glomerulonephritis and the attendant risk of graft failure due to recurrent disease. Three hundred sixty-four consecutive cadaveric (n = 214), living-related (n = 137), and living-unrelated (n = 13) renal transplants were performed in 319 patients with a diagnosis of primary glomerulonephritis. Specific diagnoses included were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis/idiopathic crescentic glomerulonephritis (RPGN/ICG), IgA nephropathy (IgA), mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis, type I and II (MPG), anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis (anti-GBM), and membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN). Rates of recurrence and graft loss were compared between patients treated with bilateral native nephrectomy (n = 61) and those who were not (n = 303). Bilateral nephrectomy did not prevent or delay the onset of recurrent glomerulonephritis in the renal allograft. In fact, there was a significantly increased five- and ten-year risk of recurrence in patients undergoing pretransplant nephrectomy vs. no nephrectomy (25.2% and 42% vs. 13.9% and 19.4%, P < 0.02, respectively). The increased rate of recurrence was evident in the CAD/LUD recipients, but not in recipients of LRD transplants. Of the specific diseases, FSGS and MGN recurred more commonly (20.2% and 20.3%, respectively). A detrimental effect of pretransplant nephrectomy on recurrence rates and incidence of graft loss due to recurrent disease independent of other variables could be demonstrated only for FSGS patients. Based on these findings, we no longer recommend native nephrectomy in the prospective renal transplant recipient at high risk for developing recurrent glomerulonephritis.