Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 26(9): 413-6, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25198482

RESUMO

A serious long-term complication of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is the occurrence of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) beyond 1 year after implantation. While VLST has been observed as late as 3 to 5 years following the initial procedure, it remains unknown whether DES thrombosis is a finite phenomenon that abates over time or is a risk that persists indefinitely. We identified a series of patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction (MI) due to "very" very late stent thrombosis (VVLST), defined as occurring more than 5 years after DES implantation. The study group consisted of 7 patients (6 men and 1 woman), ages 32 to 70 years, who had angiographically confirmed definite VVLST. Six patients were active smokers and 4 were diabetic. The interval between stent implantation and VVLST ranged from 5.6 to 7.1 years. The DES was sirolimus-eluting in 4 patients and paclitaxel-eluting in 3 patients. None of the patients were taking clopidogrel and only 2 patients were taking aspirin at the time of VVLST. Therefore, 5 of the 7 patients were not on any antiplatelet therapy prior to VVLST. The clinical presentation of VVLST was an acute MI in all patients, with ST-segment elevation in 6 of the 7 patients. Six patients were treated successfully by emergent repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 patient who was postoperative from neurosurgery was managed medically. In conclusion, the risk of stent thrombosis persists even beyond 5 years after first-generation DES implantation. These sobering findings underscore the importance of long-term clinical vigilance in these patients and reinforce current PCI guidelines, which recommend continuing at least aspirin indefinitely after DES.


Assuntos
Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Paclitaxel , Sirolimo , Trombose/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 68(5): 671-6, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17034064

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nicardipine in reversing no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is a common complication of PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes or venous bypass graft disease. Although nicardipine has an attractive pharmacological profile and has been used clinically to treat no-reflow, there is a paucity of published data regarding its effectiveness in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 consecutive patients who received intracoronary nicardipine to reverse no-reflow during coronary intervention. Qualitative TIMI flow grade and quantitative TIMI frame count methods were used to assess the efficacy of nicardipine. RESULTS: A mean of 460 +/- 360 mcg of intracoronary nicardipine was used. No-reflow was successfully reversed with complete restoration of TIMI 3 flow in 71 of 72 patients (98.6%). TIMI flow grade improved from 1.65 +/- 0.53 prior to nicardipine to 2.97 +/- 0.24 after treatment (P < 0.001). TIMI frame count decreased from 57 +/- 40 at the time of no-reflow to 15 +/- 12 after nicardipine administration (P < 0.001). Nicardipine therapy was well tolerated without adverse hemodynamic or chronotropic effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest series to date, intracoronary nicardipine was demonstrated to be a safe and highly effective pharmacological agent to reverse no-reflow during PCI.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Circulação Coronária/efeitos dos fármacos , Nicardipino/uso terapêutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Arteriais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Nicardipino/administração & dosagem , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 61(3): 327-32, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14988890

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel nonmechanical percutaneous suture device, X-Press, after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the setting of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor usage. Current percutaneous vascular suture devices remain mechanically complex and expensive and have not been shown to reduce major vascular complications. Using a 2:1 randomization scheme (2:1 ratio, device vs. compression), 393 patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization (n = 133) or PCI (n = 260) were randomized in the prospective Rapid Ambulation After Closure (RACE) study and evaluated for time to ambulation, time to hemostasis, treatment success, and incidence of major vascular complications. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 52% of PCI patients. There was a significant reduction in the primary efficacy endpoint of median time to ambulation for device compared to control with both diagnostic (2.2 vs. 6.2 hr; P = 0.0001) and PCI patients (4.1 vs. 14.7 hr; P = 0.0001). Device malfunction occurred in 3.1% patients without clinical sequalae. Equivalence in the primary safety endpoint, the incidence of major complications (vascular repair, ultrasound-guided compression, transfusion, or infection) at 14 days, was observed with the X-Press device (1/261; 0.4%) compared to control (3/132; 2.3%; P = 0.11). In PCI patients, half of whom received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of vascular complications in patients using the device (0/172; 0%) compared to control (3/88; 3.4%; P = 0.037). In diagnostic catheterization and PCI, a novel nonmechanical suture device reduced the time to ambulation and demonstrated equivalence in major complications compared to conventional compression techniques. The incidence of major complications after PCI was reduced with the device.


Assuntos
Artéria Femoral , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Vasos Sanguíneos/lesões , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Deambulação Precoce , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Prospectivos , Punções , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA