A comparative study of the etiology of adult upper and lower respiratory tract infections in the community.

Lower respiratory tract infection and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) are very common, but the etiology is not diagnosed in routine practice. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the frequency distribution of the various infectious etiologies for these diseases. One hundred seventy five adults in the community with febrile LRTI and 75 with febrile URTI were included in a purely serologically based prospective study. Paired sera were obtained for each of the patients and were tested by EIA or immunofluorescence methods to identify 14 different pathogens. Only a significant change in antibody titers between the paired sera was considered diagnostic. At least one infectious etiology was identified in 167 patients (67%). In the LRTI group, infection with at least one of 7 respiratory viruses was found in 88 patients (50%). One of the atypical pathogens was found in 40 patients (23%), of these Legionella spp. in 19 (11%) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 18 (10%). A bacterial etiology was found in 19 patients (11%), of these Streptococcus pneumoniae in 8 (5%) and beta-hemolytic streptococci group A in 5 (3%). The frequency distribution of etiologies in the URTI group was not significantly different from the LRTI group, except for M. pneumoniae that was identified in only one patient with URTI (p = 0.015). More than one etiologic agent was found in 42 (17%) of the patients. LRTI is caused by a broad spectrum of etiologies, with respiratory viruses predominating and a moderate, but significant, prevalence of atypical pathogens. The frequency distribution of etiologies for URTI is similar to LRTI. In a significant proportion of patients with URTI and LRTI there is serologic evidence of infection with more than one pathogen. The justification and benefit of distinguishing between URTI and LRTI in routine clinical work is doubtful. When a decision is reached to treat RTI patients with an antibiotic, it is logical to use a macrolide or tetracycline.

Infectious aetiologies in elderly patients hospitalised with non-pneumonic lower respiratory tract infection.

OBJECTIVE: to identify the infectious aetiologies of non-pneumonic lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalised elderly patients, and to characterise the patients in terms of demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables. DESIGN: a prospective, non-interventional, purely serologically based diagnostic study. SETTING: a tertiary university hospital in southern Israel. SUBJECTS: 133 elderly patients hospitalised for non-pneumonic lower respiratory tract infections. METHODS: paired sera were obtained for each of the hospitalisations and were tested using immunofluorescence or enzyme immunoassay methods to identify 13 different pathogens. Only significant changes in antibody titers or levels between the paired sera were considered diagnostic. RESULTS: at least one infectious aetiology was identified in 77 patients (58%). At least one of seven viral aetiologies was identified in 52 patients (39%). A bacterial aetiology was identified in 27 patients (20%) including Streptococcus pneumoniae in 24 (18%). An atypical bacterium was found in 27 patients (20%) including Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 15 (11%) and Legionella spp. in nine (7%). More than one aetiology was found in 23 patients (17%). One hundred and twenty nine patients (96%) suffered from serious chronic co-morbidity. One hundred and twenty one patients received antibiotics during their hospitalisation, 106 (80%) with a beta-lactam and 42 (31%) with another antibiotic. CONCLUSIONS: non-pneumonic lower respiratory tract infection is caused in hospitalised elderly patients by a broad spectrum of aetiological agents, primarily respiratory viruses with a significant, though lesser, prevalence of classical and atypical bacteria. Despite this distribution of aetiologies, most patients are treated with beta-lactam antibiotics. The indication for antibiotic therapy in these patients and the choice of antibiotic preparation should be addressed in further studies.

Atypical pathogen infection in adults with acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma.

In a serologically based prospective study, acute infections with four atypical pathogens were determined in 100 adults hospitalized for acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma, and compared with the corresponding rate in a matched control group. Paired sera were tested using immunofluorescence or enzyme immunoassay methods to establish the serologic diagnosis. In 18 patients (18%), there was evidence of acute infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae, compared with 3% in the control group (p = 0.0006). In 10 of these patients there was evidence of infection with at least one additional pathogen, a respiratory virus in 7. There was no significant difference between the study groups in the rates of acute infection by Chlamydia pneumoniae (8% in the hospitalized patients versus 6% in the control subjects), Legionella spp. (5 versus 3%, respectively), or Coxiella burnettii (no patients in either group). We conclude that of these four atypical pathogens, only infection with M. pneumoniae is associated with hospitalization for acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma. In most of these M. pneumoniae patients there is evidence of infection with a respiratory virus as well. The pathophysiologic and therapeutic significance of these findings should be tested in further studies specifically designed to address these questions.