Liver fibrosis index as a novel prognostic factor in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Liver dysfunction is an important determinant of the prognosis of left heart failure patients. However, few studies have reported on cardiohepatic interactions in right heart failure patients, a condition that is an important prognostic factor in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study aimed to evaluate the existence and extent of hepatic fibrosis and its contribution as a prognostic factor in PAH. This prospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with PAH in the International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital from June 2016 to December 2017. After the application of the exclusion criteria, 35 patients were assessed for hepatic fibrosis, using real-time tissue elastography, and for clinical deterioration. Sixteen healthy controls were also assessed for comparison. The liver fibrosis index (LFI) was significantly higher in PAH patients than in healthy controls (1.214 ± 0.047 vs. 0.911 ± 0.059, P < 0.001), suggesting that PAH patients exhibited mild liver fibrosis. However, patients with deterioration (vs. no deterioration) had significantly higher LFI values (1.507 ± 0.078 vs. 1.080 ± 0.034, P < 0.001), independent from other established liver function parameters. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified that an LFI ≥ 1.275 indicated a significant probability of clinical deterioration (hazard ratio: 8.4 (95% CI 1.5-45.4, P = 0.012), independent from other known PAH prognostic factors. PAH patients may exhibit subclinical liver fibrosis associated with chronic right heart failure. The LFI can serve as both a non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis and a predictive marker for the deterioration of PAH patients.

Successful transition from Treprostinil to Selexipag in patient with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: In this report, we describe the first successful case of transition from subcutaneous administration of treprostinil to selexipag in a patient with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), by evaluating hemodynamic changes and exercise tolerance. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old female with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) had received initial triple combination therapy (macitentan PO, tadalafil PO, and treprostinil SC) and achieved excellent improvement in hemodynamics. Afterwards, due to the development of side effects from subcutaneous administration, we replaced treprostinil therapy with oral selexipag, resulting in stable hemodynamic parameters and exercise capacities. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of successful replacement of treprostinil (20.1 ng/kg/min) with selexipag (1600 µg BID) as a component of triple combination therapy, which provides incentive to perform a larger, prospective exchange study.

Prognostic Values of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Clinical Outcomes in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis.

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) cut-off values of 0.75 or 0.8 have been widely used; however, whether they apply to patients on hemodialysis remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the cut-off value of FFR associated with clinical outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. Using the Japanese multicenter registry, we analyzed data of patients on hemodialysis with measured FFR between January 2010 and December 2016. Survival classification and regression tree analysis for the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization revealed a threshold FFR of 0.83. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed for the clinical outcomes. Additionally, the primary outcome was analyzed using propensity score matching by dividing the patients into complete and incomplete revascularization groups according to the presence of residual lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83 after the intervention. Of the 212 included patients, 112 (52.8%) had lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83. After adjusting for confounders, an FFR of ≤0.83 was associated with a higher risk for the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.66, p = 0.021). Propensity score matching showed that complete revascularization for lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83 was associated with a reduced risk for the primary outcome compared with incomplete revascularization (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.71, log-rank p = 0.0016). In conclusion, an FFR of ≤0.83 was an independent predictor of clinical events in patients on hemodialysis. Furthermore, complete revascularization was associated with better clinical outcomes. Thus, this population may require a distinct FFR cut-off value.

Detection of attenuated plaque in stable angina with 64-multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: To clarify multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of attenuated plaque detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four patients with stable angina underwent MDCT before IVUS. The attenuated plaque was identified in the targeted artery with IVUS, and the same artery was analyzed with MDCT for the presence of a high density area (HDA) >130 Hounsfield units (HU), and a low density area (LDA) <30 HU. A HDA in attenuated plaque was compared with that in calcified plaque. Ten attenuated plaques and 15 calcified plaques were identified in 9 of 154 patients (males=9, 66.2 ± 9.5 years). Eight of the 10 attenuated plaques and all 15 calcified plaques were accompanied with a HDA on MDCT. The HDA ranged from 174 to 667 HU (mean 389.0 ± 148.3 HU) in the 8 attenuated plaques, and from 545 to 1,205 HU (mean 920.9 ± 215.9 HU) in 15 calcified plaques. There was a significant difference in CT density of the HDA between the attenuated and calcified plaque (P<0.001). All attenuated plaques contained LDA <30 HU in the portions without HDA. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT has the ability to demonstrate attenuated plaque as the combination of HDA (approximately 400 HU on average) and LDA <30 HU. The HDA can be differentiated from calcified plaque by its lower CT density value.

The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.

AIMS: To assess the impact on clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. IVUS guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated to be useful in optimizing stent deployment. However, it is not proved that routine use of IVUS guidance with DES implantation can prevent stent thrombosis or restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical outcomes of 884 patients undergoing IVUS-guided intracoronary DES implantation from April 2003 to May 2006 were compared with the outcomes of a propensity-score matched population undergoing DES implantation with angiographic guidance alone. The primary endpoint of the study was definite stent thrombosis at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). After propensity-score matching, the two groups were well matched for clinical and angiographic characteristics. Patients undergoing IVUS-guided DES implantation underwent less direct stenting, more post-dilation, and had greater cutting balloon and rotational atherectomy use. At 30 days and at 12 months, a higher rate of definite stent thrombosis was seen in the No IVUS group (0.5 vs. 1.4%; P = 0.046) and (0.7 vs. 2.0%; P = 0.014), respectively. There were no major differences in late stent thrombosis and MACE (14.5 vs. 16.2%; P = 0.33) at 12 month follow-up between the groups. Rates of death and Q-wave myocardial infarction were similar, and there was no significant difference between groups in target vessel revascularization. However, a trend was seen in favour of the IVUS group in target lesion revascularization (5.1 vs. 7.2%; P = 0.07). IVUS guidance was an independent predictor of freedom from cumulative stent thrombosis at 12 months (adjusted HR 0.5, CI 0.1-0.8; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: IVUS guidance during DES implantation has the potential to influence treatment strategy and reduce both DES thrombosis and the need for repeat revascularization.

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents have dramatically improved results of these procedures. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is uncertain given the lack of prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice. This study represents a "real-world" evaluation of current technology in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1680 patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease were identified. Of these, 1080 patients were treated for 2-vessel disease (196 CABG and 884 PCI) and 600 for 3-vessel disease (505 CABG and 95 PCI). One-year mortality, cerebrovascular events, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target vessel failure, and composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were compared between the CABG and PCI cohorts. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline covariates and reported as hazard ratios. The unadjusted major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rate was reduced with CABG for patients with 2-vessel disease (9.7% CABG versus 21.2% PCI; P<0.001) and 3-vessel disease (10.8% CABG versus 28.4% PCI; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes showed increased major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for patients with 2-vessel (hazard ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.76; P=0.01) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 2.90; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.78; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes for the nondiabetic subpopulation demonstrated equivalent major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for 2-vessel (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.25; P=0.07) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% CI 0.77 to 3.61; P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents, CABG resulted in improved major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event in patients with 2- and 3-vessel coronary artery disease, primarily in those with underlying diabetes. Coronary artery bypass surgery may be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Impact of "off-label" utilization of drug-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

The utilization of drug-eluting stents (DES) in "real world" practice has deviated from Food and Drug Administration-approved indications. Safety concerns have arisen from recent reports that suggested increased mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) with DES usage. Little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing intracoronary DES implantation for unapproved indications as a group compared with outcomes after bare metal stent (BMS) placement. The clinical outcomes of 546 patients undergoing DES implantation for >or=1 non-Food and Drug Administration-approved ("off label") indication since the approval of the device were assessed. The group was then matched by propensity score with 546 patients receiving BMSs prior to DES approval for the same indications. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization) at 12 months. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were well matched between BMS and DES groups. The use of debulking devices was higher in the BMS group. Patients in the BMS group were more likely to be treated with larger diameter and shorter stents. There was no significant difference in the rate of in-hospital and 30-day adverse cardiac events. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events was significantly reduced in the DES group (23.6% vs 16.7%, p=0.004), driven by reductions in the need for repeat revascularization (target lesion revascularization: 16.4% vs 7.8%, p<0.001; target vessel revascularization: 20.2% vs 13.1%, p=0.003). There was no significant difference in freedom from cardiac death or nonfatal Q-wave MI between groups (p=0.27). In conclusion, the utilization of DES for non-Food and Drug Administration-approved indications proved to be efficacious and safe when compared with a BMS cohort matched by propensity score. The advantage for DES was driven by reductions in repeat revascularization. "Off-label" DES use was not associated with increased rates of cardiac death and nonfatal MI at 12 months.

Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for narrowing in saphenous vein grafts.

Conflicting data exist regarding an advantage of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in catheter-based treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenoses. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of these modalities in that lesion subset. The DES group consisted of 138 cases with 183 lesions (sirolimus-eluting stents, n = 117; paclitaxel-eluting stents, n = 66) and the BMS group consisted of 344 cases with 478 lesions that were followed to 1 year. We examined a composite end point that comprised death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. More BMS were deployed per patient (p <0.001) and the diameters of BMS deployed was significantly greater (p <0.001). Peak postprocedure values of creatine kinase-MB (p = 0.003) and troponin I (p = 0.05) were higher in BMS. At 1 year there was no significant superiority of DES over BMS with regard to hard end points (death and Q-wave myocardial infarction). In conclusion, this study indicates that both DES and BMS for SVG disease provide acceptably safe and efficacious results, but unlike the case in native coronary arteries, DES use does not reduce the frequency of the need for repeat revascularization.

Impact of optimal medical therapy and revascularization on outcome of patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis who presented with acute coronary syndrome.

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The poor prognosis associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in these patients has been related to therapeutic nihilism. This study included 2,357 patients with ACS who had percutaneous coronary intervention. According to their creatinine clearance and medical history, they were divided into 3 groups: dialysis (n = 73); CKD (n= 293); and control (n= 1,991). Rates of cardiovascular events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up period. Patients in all groups received similar contemporary therapy for ACS, including percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal medial therapy. On admission, patients with CKD and patients on dialysis more often presented with cardiogenic shock (p = 0.05 and 0.02, respectively). A graded increase in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was observed with decreasing renal function (control 13%, CKD 22.9%, dialysis 45.2%, p <0.001 for all comparisons). In multivariate analysis, patients with CKD and on dialysis were significantly associated with 1-year major adverse cardiac events with adjusted hazard ratios of, respectively, 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.1; p = 0.009) and 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 4.1; p <0.001). In conclusion, despite optimal contemporary medical therapy and revascularization, the prognosis of patients with CKD and, in particular, of patients undergoing dialysis, remains poor.

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of post-percutaneous coronary intervention nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus and normal baseline serum creatinine levels.

Diabetes mellitus is an independent predictor of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The outcomes of patients with diabetes with normal baseline serum creatinine who undergo PCI remain underevaluated. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence, outcomes, and correlates of post-PCI nephropathy in this subset. The study cohort consisted of 570 patients with diabetes with normal serum creatinine (< or =1.3 mg/dl) who underwent PCI from August 2004 to December 2006. Patients aged >75 years and those presenting with either acute myocardial infarctions or cardiogenic shock were excluded. Post-PCI nephropathy was defined as a > or =25% increase in baseline creatinine. The study end points were post-PCI nephropathy and major adverse cardiac events at 6 months. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors. Post-PCI nephropathy occurred in 70 patients (incidence 12.3%). These patients were more likely to be women (55.7% vs 35.5%, p = 0.001) and to have histories of congestive heart failure (24.2% vs 14.7%, p = 0.048). Entry-site complications (hematoma, pseudoaneurysm) and the need for blood transfusion (16.7% vs 1.7%, p <0.001) were more common in this group. In-hospital mortality (8.6% vs 0.2%, p <0.001) and length of stay (4.51 +/- 5.2 vs 2.23 +/- 2.9 days, p <0.001) were significantly higher in the group with post-PCI nephropathy. No study patient required dialysis. At 6 months, major adverse cardiac events were markedly higher in patients with post-PCI nephropathy (21.4% vs 6.0%, p <0.001), driven by death and revascularization. Independent predictors of post-PCI nephropathy were lower body mass index and blood transfusion. Post-PCI nephropathy independently predicted major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 8.6, p <0.001). In conclusion, post-PCI nephropathy occurred in 12.3% of patients with diabetes with normal baseline serum creatinine and carried a significant detrimental impact on prognosis. The requirement for blood transfusions was the strongest correlate identified.

Observations and outcomes of definite and probable drug-eluting stent thrombosis seen at a single hospital in a four-year period.

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a major safety concern after drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to examine the incidence, timing, clinical correlates, and outcomes after DES thrombosis in a real-world population. A retrospective analysis of 8,402 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received a DES was performed. After DES implantation, 84 definite (DST) and 127 probable ST events occurred. The incidence of early DST was 0.8%, late DST was 0.4%, and very late DST was 0.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction during admission, number of stents, and DES placement in a restenotic lesion were independently associated with DST. The incidence of early definite or probable ST (DPST) was 1.9%, late DPST was 1.4%, and very late DPST was 0.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of diabetes, myocardial infarction during admission, cardiogenic shock, number of stents, and DES use in a restenotic lesion were independently associated with DPST. Both types of ST were associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and revascularization up to 24 months after DES implantation. In conclusion, ST after DES implantation in contemporary practice continues to occur from 30 days to 2 years at a rate > or =0.36%/year and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, and DES use in a restenotic lesion were strongly associated with DST; therefore, careful consideration should apply when deploying a DES in these populations.

Two-year outcome of patients treated with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).

Multiple studies comparing sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with coronary artery disease have been performed. Despite these comparisons, it remains uncertain whether a differential in long-term efficacy and safety exists. Unselected patients treated exclusively with 1 drug-eluting stent type were enrolled in the Registry Experience at the Washington Hospital Center with Drug-Eluting Stents. There were 2,099 patients (3,766 lesions) treated with SES and 1,079 patients (1,850 lesions) treated with PES. Patients were followed at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for the clinical endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and definite and definite/probable stent thrombosis. Patients in the SES group had more dyslipidemia, history of congestive heart failure, and ostial lesions; patients treated with PES had more previous coronary artery bypass surgery, unstable angina, and type C lesions. At 2 years, unadjusted major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (22.6% vs 21.1%, p = 0.3) and target vessel revascularization (13.3% vs 11.2%, p = 0.1) were comparable. The incidence of definite stent thrombosis was higher in the SES group (1.8% vs 0.9%, p = 0.05) driven by early events. Similar results were seen after adjustment for baseline differences: MACE (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9 to 1.3, p = 0.5), definite stent thrombosis (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2, p = 0.05), and target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.4). The incidence and rate of late stent thrombosis (>30 days) were similar (0.7% vs 0.5%, p = 0.4 and 0.24%/year, both groups, respectively). In conclusion, no major differential in long-term safety or efficacy was detected between SES and PES; both stent types were efficacious in reducing revascularization but were limited by a small continual increase in late stent thrombosis.

Bleeding risk and outcomes of Bivalirudin versus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with targeted low-dose unfractionated Heparin in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention for either stable or unstable angina pectoris.

For patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin was previously shown to significantly reduce bleeding complications at the cost of a modest increase in ischemic events compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). However, the excess bleeding in patients treated with UFH and GPIs may have been caused by excessively high UFH doses and increased activated clotting times. This study sought to determine the bleeding risk of targeted low-dose UFH with GPIs compared with bivalirudin in patients undergoing elective PCI. Of 1,205 patients undergoing elective PCI, 602 underwent PCI with adjunctive UFH and GPIs with the UFH dose targeted to an activated clotting time of approximately 250 seconds, and 603 patients matched for baseline characteristics underwent PCI with bivalirudin. Outcomes were analyzed for major bleeding (hematocrit decrease >15%, gastrointestinal bleed, or major hematoma) and 6-month major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization). The maximum activated clotting time achieved was 261.7 +/- 61.6 seconds in the UFH/GPI group and 355.4 +/- 66.6 in the bivalirudin group (p <0.001). In-hospital major bleeding rates were similar between groups (1.8% UFH/GPI vs 1.7% bivalirudin; p = 0.83), as were transfusion requirements (1.2% UFH/GPI vs 0.5% bivalirudin; p = 0.61). The 6-month major adverse cardiac event rate was also similar between groups (9.5% UFH/GPI vs 9.0% bivalirudin; p = 0.81). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in major bleeding and 6-month major adverse cardiac events for patients undergoing elective PCI treated with targeted low-dose UFH and GPIs compared with those treated with bivalirudin.

Adjunct thrombus aspiration reduces mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with high-risk angiographic characteristics.

Routine aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not proved effective in randomized trials. However, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with severely reduced flow or visible thrombus, AT remains an intuitively attractive option. The use of adjunctive AT in a high-risk cohort of 158 consecutive patients with STEMI and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 0 to 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography was examined. Of these, 80 patients underwent AT as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and 78 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without AT (non-AT). TIMI 3 flow rates, residual thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention, and major adverse cardiac events (mortality and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction) at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year were compared. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The AT group more frequently achieved TIMI 3 flow after the intervention (91.3% AT vs 67.9% non-AT; p <0.001) and had less residual thrombus (7.5% AT vs 19.2% non-AT; p = 0.03). AT was associated with reduced major adverse cardiac events at 6 months (6.8% AT vs 24.0% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (16.6% AT vs 29.2% non-AT; p = 0.009), and decreased mortality rates in the AT group at 6 months (5.4% AT vs 21.3% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (7.7% AT vs 26.2% non-AT; p = 0.005). In conclusion, for patients with STEMI and TIMI 0 or 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography, AT was associated with increased TIMI 3 flow rates, decreased residual thrombus, and decreased clinical events, including mortality.

Can direct stenting in selected saphenous vein graft lesions be considered an alternative to percutaneous intervention with a distal protection device?

BACKGROUND: Distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is associated with a high rate of myonecrosis. Although direct stenting (DS) is feasible with less catheter manipulations, its ability to prevent distal embolization in SVG lesions compared with distal protection devices (DPD) is unknown. METHODS: The study included 188 SVG lesions subjected to PCI, 101 patients with 101 lesions treated with DPD, and 87 patients with 87 lesions by DS without DPD. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in-hospital and at 30 days were compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for higher frequencies of unstable angina (53% vs. 67%, P = 0.045) and prior myocardial infarction (38% vs. 53%, P = 0.07) in the DS group. There was no difference in lesion type aside from more restenotic lesions in the DS group (7% vs. 16%, P = 0.047). Drug-eluting stent deployment was similar. Stent length in the DPD group (22.8 +/- 7.2 mm) was significantly longer than that in the DS group (17.6 +/- 8.0 mm, P < 0.001). Although maximum creatine kinase (CK)-MB value in the DPD group (2.5 +/- 5.8 ng/ml) was significantly larger than in the DS group (1.3 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, P = 0.039), the frequency of CK-MB rise >2 times the upper limit of normal did not differ (11% vs. 6%, P = 0.2). There were no differences in MACE rates in-hospital and at 30 days. By multivariate analysis, neither DPD nor DS was a significant predictor for maximum CK-MB value. CONCLUSION: DS should be considered an alternative treatment to PCI with DPD for selected SVG lesions.

Successful treatment of a coronary cameral fistula secondary to elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Coronary cameral fistulae, communications between the coronary tree and the chambers of the heart, are a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. The functional significance and management of these fistulae remain uncertain. We report such a case in a patient undergoing elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and provide a review of the literature.

Intravascular ultrasound parameters associated with stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent deployment.

Drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis (ST) can be devastating. The study aim was to evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors for DES thrombosis by comparing IVUS studies after implantation in 13 patients with 14 DES thrombosis lesions with a group of controls (30 lesions in 27 patients) matched for history of chronic renal failure and type of DES. Five patients (38%) discontinued dual antiplatelet therapy at the time of ST. There were 3 in-stent restenosis lesions (21%) treated using DESs in the ST group compared with 0 in the control group (p <0.05). Compared with the control group, IVUS studies in the ST group showed a smaller minimum stent area (4.6 +/- 1.1 vs 5.6 +/- 1.7 mm(2), p = 0.0489). In the ST group, 11 of 14 stents had a minimum stent area < or =5.0 mm(2) compared with 12 of 30 in the control group (p = 0.0392). Minimum stent area in patients who stopped clopidogrel therapy and developed ST (5.30 +/- 1.15 mm(2)) tended to be larger compared with that in patients who developed ST while using clopidogrel (4.24 +/- 0.96 mm(2), p = 0.091). Within the 5-mm-long proximal and distal reference segments analyzed, the ST group had larger proximal reference maximum plaque burdens and smaller minimum lumen areas, along with a tendency toward similar findings in the distal reference segments. In conclusion, IVUS findings at the time of DES implantation in patients who subsequently developed ST showed a smaller minimum stent area (especially in patients who developed ST while using clopidogrel) and more residual disease at the stent edges.

Peri-stent reference segment plaque burden is associated with disease progression in saphenous vein grafts (a serial intravascular ultrasound assessment).

We are aware of no studies of peri-stent disease progression or luminal compromise in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. We used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess disease progression in peri-stent saphenous vein bypass graft reference segments. We studied 37 peri-stent SVG reference segments in 21 patients; 16 were proximal and 21 were distal to the stent. The same anatomic image slice was analyzed after the intervention and at follow-up; this site was 3.68 +/- 2.22 mm from the stent edge. Graft age was 10.1 +/- 5.4 years, and mean follow-up duration was 13 months (range 3 to 61). Overall, change in SVG area, change in lumen area, and change in plaque burden correlated with postintervention plaque burden (r = 0.448, p = 0.005; r = -0.584, p <0.001; and r = 0.507, p = 0.001, respectively). For the proximal edge, change in lumen area correlated with change in plaque area (r = -0.951, p <0.001), but not with change in SVG area (r = -0.337, p = 0.201). For the distal edge, change in lumen area correlated more strongly with change in plaque area (r = -0.982, p <0.001) than with change in SVG area (r = -0.624, p = 0.003). When peri-stent reference segments were divided into 2 groups according to postintervention plaque burden (>50% [n = 20] vs <50% [n = 17]), there was a greater decrease in lumen area (-1.12 +/- 0.81 vs -0.33 +/- 0.26 mm(2), p <0.001) and greater increases in SVG area (0.26 +/- 0.29 vs 0.09 +/- 0.09 mm(2), p = 0.027), plaque area (1.37 +/- 0.96 vs 0.42 +/- 0.30 mm(2), p <0.001), and plaque burden (8.2 +/- 5.6% vs. 2.8 +/- 1.6%, p <0.001) in segments with a plaque burden >50%. In conclusion, peri-stent reference segment SVG disease progression and lumen loss were more significant in segments with a greater postintervention plaque burden after implantation of a bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent.

Correlates of clinical restenosis following intracoronary implantation of drug-eluting stents.

Despite significant decreases in restenosis and repeated intervention achieved using drug-eluting stents (DESs), the benefit has not been homogenous across all patient and lesion subsets. Identification of correlates of DES restenosis may allow a differing management approach and lead to improved patient outcomes. The study population consisted of 3,535 consecutive patients (5,046 lesions) who underwent successful sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for >or=1 native coronary artery or bypass graft lesion from April 2003 to September 2006. From this cohort, 197 patients (237 lesions) were identified to have in-stent restenosis (ISR) requiring revascularization within 12 months of stent implantation. This group was compared with the remainder of the patient population. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DES ISR. Independent correlates of DES ISR using multivariate analysis included both clinical and procedural factors. Clinical predictors were age, hypertension, and unstable angina. Procedural predictors were left anterior descending artery intervention, number of stents implanted, stented length/lesion, and lack of intravascular ultrasound guidance. Implantation of >or=3 stents was associated with a significantly higher restenosis risk (9.7% vs 5.1%; p=0.0003). A 10-mm increase in stented length was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35). Diabetes, stent diameter, and stent type were found not to be predictive of DES ISR. In conclusion, correlates of DES ISR included both clinical and procedural factors. Limiting the number of stents and stented length, in addition to intravascular ultrasound guidance, may minimize DES ISR.

Comparison of effectiveness of bare metal stents versus drug-eluting stents in large (> or =3.5 mm) coronary arteries.

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are superior to bare metal stents (BMSs) in decreasing restenosis rates across a wide range of patient and lesion subsets. However, widespread utilization of DESs raises concerns with regard to risks of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, the potential for late adverse events such as late thrombosis, and cost. Vessel diameter and lesion length have been previously identified as predictors for restenosis for DESs and BMSs. This study compared the clinical outcomes of DESs versus BMSs in large coronary arteries (> or =3.5 mm). A cohort of 233 patients who underwent single-vessel angioplasty with DES implantation in large vessels was compared with 233 propensity-matched patients who received BMSs in vessels with similar reference vessel diameters. Clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year were compared between groups. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar. Target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events were low and comparable between the 2 groups at all follow-up intervals. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 8.5% of patients with DESs and 7.7% of patients with BMSs (p = 0.80). There were no episodes of subacute stent thrombosis or late thrombosis in either group. In conclusion, implantation of DESs in large coronary arteries confers no additional benefit compared with BMSs, and the 2 approaches are associated with equally favorable clinical outcomes at 1 year.