Early type II fiber atrophy in intensive care unit patients with nonexcitable muscle membrane.

OBJECTIVE: Intensive care unit-acquired weakness indicates increased morbidity and mortality. Nonexcitable muscle membrane after direct muscle stimulation develops early and predicts intensive care unit-acquired weakness in sedated, mechanically ventilated patients. A comparison of muscle histology at an early stage in intensive care unit-acquired weakness has not been done. We investigated whether nonexcitable muscle membrane indicates fast-twitch myofiber atrophy during the early course of critical illness. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Two intensive care units at Charité University Medicine, Berlin. PATIENTS: Patients at increased risk for development of intensive care unit-acquired weakness, indicated by Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores ≥8 on 3 of 5 consecutive days within their first week in the intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Electrophysiological compound muscle action potentials after direct muscle stimulation and muscle biopsies were obtained at median days 7 and 5, respectively. Patients with nonexcitable muscle membranes (n = 15) showed smaller median type II cross-sectional areas (p < .05), whereas type I muscle fibers did not compared with patients with preserved muscle membrane excitability (compound muscle action potentials after direct muscle stimulation ≥3.0 mV; n = 9). We also observed decreased mRNA transcription levels of myosin heavy chain isoform IIa and a lower densitometric ratio of fast-to-slow myosin heavy chain protein content. CONCLUSION: We suggest that electrophysiological nonexcitable muscle membrane predicts preferential type II fiber atrophy in intensive care unit patients during early critical illness.

Outcome Comparison of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Patients with Trauma-Associated and Non-Trauma-Associated ARDS: A Retrospective 11-Year Period Analysis.

(1) Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rare complication in multiply injured patients. Due to the rarity of ARDS development after trauma, little is known about outcomes of patients with trauma-associated ARDS compared to patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS. (2) Methods: This retrospective analysis included n = 1038 ARDS patients admitted to the ARDS center of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin between 2007 and 2018. Patients with trauma-associated ARDS (n = 62) were compared to patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS (n = 976). In a secondary analysis, patients from the group with non-trauma-associated ARDS were 1:1 nearest neighbor matched to patients with trauma-associated ARDS. The primary outcomes were 28-day in-hospital mortality, 60-day in-hospital mortality, and overall in-hospital mortality. (3) Results: Overall in-hospital mortality in trauma-associated ARDS was 29.0% compared to 40.5% in all patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS (p = 0.074). The in-hospital mortality rate in matched patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS (33.9%) was comparable to the trauma-associated ARDS cohort (p = 0.701). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated time-sensitive variations in 28-day and 60-day in-hospital survival. (4) Conclusion: Mortality was not different in patients with trauma-associated ARDS compared to patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS. Survival rate in the Kaplan-Meier curves stabilized after the critical initial phase and throughout the further 60-day period in patients with trauma-associated ARDS compared to patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS. Since this divergence was less pronounced in the matched cohort, it may be related to the younger age, fewer comorbidities, and lower ARDS severity in patients with trauma-associated ARDS. Patients with trauma-associated ARDS remain a very different cohort compared to patients with non-trauma-associated ARDS. Therefore, the outcome comparison is limited, even after matching.