Decrease in semen quality and Leydig cell function in infertile men: a longitudinal study.

STUDY QUESTION: Are infertile men with reduced semen quality at risk of a further decrease in testicular function? SUMMARY ANSWER: Infertile men with severely reduced semen quality risk further deterioration of semen quality 15 years after treatment for infertility, and a lower baseline sperm concentration was associated with a more pronounced increase in LH and decrease in testosterone/LH ratio at follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Male factors account for up to 50% of human infertility. The most common finding is spermatogenic failure (SgF) yet the life course of semen quality and testosterone production in such men has not been described. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A follow-up study of men with SgF was performed 15 years after the initial infertility assessment between January 1995 and December 2000. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Hospital records were used to identify potential participants in the study. A total of 137 men with primary male infertility due to SgF and 70 controls with good semen quality from couples with female factor infertility who attended a tertiary referral centre were included: the participation rate was 31% and 26%, respectively. The men provided semen samples and underwent a physical examination. Blood samples were taken to measure levels of reproductive hormones (FSH, LH, testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, estradiol and inhibin B). Current results were compared with results from the initial assessments. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At the time of follow up the SgF men had significantly lower Leydig cell capacity than the control group as well as much lower semen quality. For the SgF men, between baseline sampling and follow up, the median sperm concentration decreased from 1.9 to 0.6 mill/ml and total sperm count from 7.7 to 2.0 million (P = 0.019 and 0.012, respectively), and 10% developed azoospermia. Calculated free testosterone (cFT), but not total testosterone (tT) decreased in the SgF group by ~0.6% (95% CI 0.1-1.2%) per year. In the SgF group, LH increased by 1.6% (CI 0.9-2.3%) annually, and consequently tT/LH and cFT/LH ratios had decreased by 1.3% (CI 0.5-2.1) and 2.1% (CI 1.2-3.0%), respectively. The increase in LH and the decreases in tT/LH and cFT/LH ratios were more pronounced in men with lower baseline sperm concentrations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We consider the case group as representative of infertile men not in need of testosterone treatment at baseline investigation, but do not have information on those that chose not to participate in the follow-up study. There were alterations in some hormone analysis methods during the follow-up period that may introduce uncertainty in interpretation of long-term changes in hormone levels despite rigorous quality control. The validity of the control group suffers from a lack of hormone values at baseline. Also, at follow-up, for practical reasons only one semen sample could be obtained, which makes the effect estimate more uncertain and there is a risk of non-differential misclassification. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Without being able to predict individual outcomes, it is prudent to consider sperm cryopreservation or advise not to postpone fertility treatment when men present with infertility due to impaired semen quality. Whether partly compensated Leydig cell insufficiency in men with SgF will eventually develop into overt testosterone deficiency cannot be determined from our study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s): Aase and Einar Danielsen (Grant no. 10-001053), Nordic Research Committee (Grant no. 5109), The Kirsten and Freddie Johansen Fund, and Rigshospitalet's Research Fund (grant no. R24-A812). There are no competing interests.

A novel double staining strategy for improved detection of testicular carcinoma in situ cells in human semen samples.

Prompted by the recently reported expression of POU5F1 (OCT3/4) in epididymis, a panel of markers for carcinoma in situ (CIS) testis and testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT), including AP-2γ(TFAP2C), NANOG, OCT3/4, KIT, placental-like alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), M2A/PDPN and MAGE-A4 were examined by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridisation in urogenital epithelia, which may interfere with detection of CIS cells in semen. In addition to OCT3/4, the expression of AP-2γ and NANOG or their variants was detected in urogenital epithelia, while other CIS markers, including PLAP/alkaline phosphatase were absent. A combination of immunocytological staining for AP-2γ or OCT3/4 and rapid cytochemical alkaline phosphatase reaction was subsequently developed. This approach was tested in 22 patients with TGCT. In 14 patients (63.6%), double stained cells were found and thus the method was proven suitable for the detection of CIS cells in semen. In conclusion, transcription factors related to pluripotency and undifferentiated state of cells, which most likely have several variants or modifications, are unexpectedly detected using currently available antibodies in urogenital epithelial cells which may be shed into semen. Combining the immunohistochemical nuclear markers with a rapid cytochemical alkaline phosphatase reaction for detection of CIS cells in ejaculates may provide a more reliable diagnostic method.

Serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone is not associated with semen quality.

Impaired semen quality is frequent in Western countries and is the main reason or contributing reason in up to 50% of cases of couple infertility. Male factor infertility is mainly determined by examination of semen samples according to the World Health Organization's 2010 guidelines. AMH has both autocrine and paracrine properties through a direct effect via the AMH type II receptor and is therefore thought to be involved in spermatogenesis. We aimed to study the association between the serum concentration of AMH and semen quality in a cross-sectional study including 970 young Danish men from the general population. All participants provided a semen sample, had a blood sample drawn, underwent a physical examination, and answered a questionnaire including information on lifestyle and medical history. Serum concentrations of reproductive hormones [AMH, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), total testosterone (T), calculated free T, oestradiol (E2) and inhibin B] and semen parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration, and percentages of motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa) were determined. We found no association between serum AMH and semen quality, except for a significant (p = 0.011) trend for lower percentage of normal morphology with higher AMH. AMH quartile was positively associated with serum inhibin B (p < 0.001), inhibin B/FSH ratio (p < 0.001) and T/E2 ratio (0.016), and negatively associated with FSH (p = 0.004), LH (p = 0.005) and E2 (p = 0.028). There was no association between AMH quartile and T, calculated free T or total T/LH ratio. In conclusion, serum AMH is not useful as a marker of semen quality, and semen analysis using WHO criteria is still the golden standard in the evaluation of the infertile man.