Disposition and metabolism of the specific endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan (ZD4054) in healthy volunteers.

Zibotentan (ZD4054) is a specific endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist that is in clinical development for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and has shown a promising signal for improvement in overall survival compared with placebo in a Phase II study of patients with metastatic CRPC. In this study, the pharmacokinetics, disposition and metabolism of zibotentan were evaluated following administration of a single oral dose of [(14)C]-zibotentan 15 mg to six healthy subjects. Zibotentan was rapidly absorbed, with the maximum zibotentan plasma concentration being observed 1 hour after administration. Excretion was rapid with the majority of the dose being excreted in the urine (71-94%). Total recovery of radioactivity over the 5 days of the study was high (mean 93%), with 78% of the dose being recovered within 24 hours. Concentrations of radioactivity in the plasma were similar up to 12 hours post dose, and diverged thereafter, indicating the presence of circulating metabolites. The main circulating component was zibotentan with a number of metabolites being identified in excreta. Zibotentan was well absorbed and was cleared via metabolism and urinary excretion with zibotentan-related material predominantly excreted via the urine.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of zibotentan (ZD4054) in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment: two open-label comparative studies.

BACKGROUND: Zibotentan (ZD4054) is a specific endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist being investigated for the treatment of prostate cancer. As zibotentan is eliminated by renal and metabolic routes, clearance may be reduced in patients with hepatic or renal impairment, leading to greater drug exposure. METHODS: Open-label studies investigated the PK and tolerability of zibotentan in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, compared with those with normal organ function. In the hepatic and renal studies, respectively, subjects were divided into categories using Child-Pugh classification or 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (mild, moderate, or severe impairment and normal function). Each subject received a single oral dose of zibotentan 10 mg and PK sampling was undertaken. Within the hepatic study, AUC and Cmax were expressed as the ratio of geometric means and 90% CI for each impairment group compared with the normal function group. The possibility that hepatic impairment had a clinically relevant effect on exposure was considered if the upper 90% CI for the ratio exceeded 2. In the renal study, AUC, Cmax and t1/2 were analyzed using linear regression fitting effects for creatinine clearance and age. RESULTS: In the hepatic and renal studies respectively, 32 subjects (eight per group) and 48 subjects received treatment (n = 18 normal, n = 12 mild, n = 9 moderate, n = 9 severe). Zibotentan Cmax was not significantly affected by hepatic or renal impairment. Compared with the normal function group, zibotentan AUC was 40% (1.40; 90% CI 0.91-2.17), 45% (1.45; 90% CI 0.94-2.24) and 190% (2.90; 90% CI 1.88-4.49) higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, and 66% (1.66; 90% CI 1.38-1.99), 89% (1.89; 90% CI 1.50-2.39) and 117% (2.17; 90% CI 1.64-2.86) higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. In both studies mean t1/2 increased and zibotentan clearance decreased with the degree of impairment. Headache was the most common AE in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Zibotentan absorption was unchanged, however, exposure was higher in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment due to slower clearance. This increased exposure did not result in differences in the range or severity of AEs observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00672581 and AstraZeneca study number D4320C00016 (renal trial; conducted in Germany).

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ticagrelor in healthy subjects.

Ticagrelor [(1S,2S,3R,5S)-3-[7-[[(1R,2S)-2-(3,4-difluorophenyl) cyclopropyl]amino]-5-(propylthio)-3H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidin-3-yl]-5-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-1,2-cyclopentanediol)] is a reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist in development for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of ticagrelor were investigated over 168 h in six healthy male subjects receiving a single oral suspension dose of 200 mg of [(14)C]ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was rapidly absorbed with a maximum plasma concentration at 1.5 h. The major active metabolite, AR-C124910XX, is formed by O-deethylation. Exposure to AR-C124910XX was 29% of peak and 40% of overall exposure to ticagrelor. In most subjects, radioactivity was undetectable in plasma after 20 h and whole blood after 12 h (half-life values of 6.3 and 4.6 h, respectively). The ratio of radioactivity in plasma to whole blood was 1.69, suggesting that ticagrelor and its metabolites are largely restricted to the plasma space. Mean radioactivity recovery was 26.5% in urine and 57.8% in feces. Major circulating components in the plasma and feces were identified as ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, whereas in urine the major components were metabolite M5 (AR-C133913XX) and its glucuronide conjugate M4. Levels of unchanged ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were <0.05% in the urine, indicating that renal clearance of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX is of minor importance. Interindividual variability was small in both urine and fecal extracts with only small quantitative differences. All 10 of the metabolites were fully or partially characterized and a full biotransformation pathway was proposed for ticagrelor, in which oxidative loss of the hydroxyethyl side chain from ticagrelor forms AR-C124910XX and a second oxidative pathway leads to N-dealkylation of ticagrelor, forming AR-C133913XX.

Open-label phase I trial of vandetanib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vandetanib (ZACTIMA) is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. The safety and tolerability of vandetanib plus mFOLFOX6 was investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients eligible for first- or second-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) plus 14-day treatment cycles of mFOLFOX6. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received vandetanib 100 mg (n = 9) or 300 mg (n = 8) plus mFOLFOX6. The protocol definition of a tolerable dose (vandetanib-related dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] in less than two patients) was met in both dose cohorts, with one DLT of diarrhoea reported in each. Overall, the most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea and lethargy (all n = 11). There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between vandetanib and mFOLFOX6. Preliminary efficacy results included one complete response and three confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CRC, once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) with mFOLFOX6 was generally well tolerated.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, First-Time-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of GSK3389404 in Healthy Subjects.

GSK3389404 is a liver-targeted antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits synthesis of hepatitis B surface antigen and all other hepatitis B virus proteins. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, phase 1 study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of GSK3389404 administered subcutaneously (SC) in healthy subjects. Four single ascending-dose cohorts (10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg) and 3 multiple ascending-dose cohorts (30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg once weekly for 4 weeks) each comprised 6 subjects randomized to GSK3389404 and 2 subjects randomized to placebo. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or withdrawals due to AEs. The safety profile did not worsen with repeated dosing. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were injection site reactions (19.0% [n = 8/42], frequency unrelated to dose levels); all were mild (Grade 1) and resolved without dose modification or discontinuation. GSK3389404 administered subcutaneously was readily absorbed with a time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax ) of 1-4 hours and an elimination half-life of 3-6 hours in plasma. Plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) were dose-proportional. Dose-normalized plasma AUC from time 0 to infinity averaged 69.9 ng·h/(mL·mg dose) across cohorts, and Cmax 9.5 ng/(mL·mg dose). Pharmacokinetic profiles and parameters were comparable between single and multiple dosing. No accumulation was observed with once-weekly dosing. The metabolite was undetectable in urine and plasma. In the pooled urine, GSK3389404 was estimated to account for <0.1% of the total dose. In summary, GSK3389404 dosing has been tested up to 120 mg for 4 weeks with an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile, supporting further clinical investigation in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Effects of CYP3A4 Inhibitors Ketoconazole and Verapamil and the CYP3A4 Inducer Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Fostamatinib: Results from In Vitro and Phase I Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND: Fostamatinib (R788) is a spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor. The active metabolite of fostamatinib, R406, is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize hepatic microsomal metabolism of R406 and confirm the role of CYP3A4 in R406 metabolism, determining whether co-administration of CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, verapamil) or inducers (rifampicin) affects R406 pharmacokinetics. METHODS: R406 stability was determined using human hepatic microsomes. The CYP450 isoforms responsible for R406 metabolism in humans were identified using expressed CYP450 isoforms and specific chemical inhibitors. The ketoconazole interaction study (double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover) involved fostamatinib administration (single 80-mg dose), alone and with ketoconazole (200 mg twice daily). The verapamil and rifampicin interaction studies (open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence) involved fostamatinib administration (single 150-mg dose), alone and with immediate-release verapamil (80 mg three times daily) or rifampicin (600 mg once daily). Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in all studies. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Hepatic microsomes showed time-dependent loss of R406 and formation of para-O-demethylated R406. Microsomal metabolism of R406 was markedly inhibited by CYP3A4 inhibitors and, in the expressed CYP450 studies, the rate of R406 disappearance was greatest with CYP3A4. In the clinical studies, co-administration of ketoconazole caused a 2-fold (CI 1.77-2.30) increase in R406 exposure. Verapamil increased R406 exposure (39% increase, CI 8-80), whereas rifampicin co-administration decreased exposure by 75% (CI 68-81). Fostamatinib was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The oxidative metabolism of R406 is predominantly catalyzed by CYP3A4. In clinical studies, exposure to R406 is affected by concomitant administration of CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors. These findings should be taken into account when considering co-prescription of fostamatinib with such agents.

Effects of Fostamatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of the CYP2C8 Substrate Pioglitazone: Results From In Vitro and Phase 1 Clinical Studies.

Fostamatinib is a prodrug that undergoes gastrointestinal tract dephosphorylation to form the active metabolite, R406. Here we report its cytochrome P450-inducing potential. In vitro, R406 3 and 10 µM induced CYP2C8 to levels representing 53% and 75%, respectively, of the level achieved by the positive control, rifampicin. Induction of other enzymes was minor. The effect of fostamatinib (100 mg twice daily) on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral 30-mg dose of the CYP2C8 substrate pioglitazone and its metabolite, hydroxy pioglitazone, was then investigated (open-label, nonrandomized, 2-period phase I study [n = 15]). Coadministration of fostamatinib and pioglitazone (vs pioglitazone alone) was associated with lower mean maximum plasma concentration values for pioglitazone (geometric least-squares mean ratio, 82.8; 90% confidence interval, 64.2-106.8) and hydroxy pioglitazone (90.9; 78.6-105.1), an increase in pioglitazone AUC (117.8; 108.4-128.0), a decrease in hydroxy pioglitazone AUC(0-t) (89.7; 78.9-101.9), and an increase in pioglitazone geometric mean t1/2λz (9.4-12.8 hours). No tolerability concerns were identified upon coadministration. These data suggest that although clinical significance has not been formally evaluated, fostamatinib is unlikely to have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone (which may be extrapolated to other CYP2C8 substrates). However, vigilance is advised should these agents be prescribed together.

Pharmacokinetic Properties of Fostamatinib in Patients With Renal or Hepatic Impairment: Results From 2 Phase I Clinical Studies.

PURPOSE: Phase III trials of fostamatinib, an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis have been completed. Herein, we report the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the active metabolite of fostamatinib, R406, in plasma, and on the urinary excretion of R406 and its metabolite N-glucuronide. METHODS: Two Phase I, single-center, open-label clinical trials determined the PK properties and tolerability of fostamatinib in subjects with normal or impaired renal or hepatic function. Twenty-four subjects in the study in renal impairment (8 per group: normal renal function, moderate renal dysfunction, or end-stage renal disease [ESRD]), and 32 subjects in the study in hepatic impairment (8 per group: normal hepatic function or mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment) received a single 150-mg dose of fostamatinib. Patients with ESRD in the study in renal impairment participated in 2 treatment periods separated by a ≥1-week washout. In these patients, fostamatinib was administered after dialysis or 2 hours before dialysis. FINDINGS: Geometric mean R406 Cmax and AUC values were less in the combined renally impaired group than in the group with normal renal function; Tmax was similar across groups. However, renal impairment had no apparent effect considered clinically relevant on unbound R406. In patients with ESRD, R406 exposure was less when fostamatinib was administered after compared with before dialysis. Urinary excretion of R406 N-glucuronide was decreased with increasing severity of renal impairment. Renal elimination of R406 was negligible in all groups. Varying degrees of hepatic impairment had no consistent effects on the PK properties of R406. R406 Cmax values were 10% to 15% less in all hepatically impaired groups than in the group with normal hepatic function. AUC and Tmax values were similar between the groups with normal and severely impaired hepatic function; in the groups with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, AUC was less and Tmax was greater. The geometric mean percentage of unbound R406 ranged from 0.64% to 1.95% and was greatest in the group with severe hepatic impairment. The urinary excretion of R406 was minimal. The amount of R406 N-glucuronide excreted in urine was greater in severely hepatically impaired patients. Fostamatinib 150 mg was generally well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: In these patients, renal or hepatic impairment did not affect exposure to the active metabolite of fostamatinib, R406, to a clinically relevant extent. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01245790 (renal) and NCT01222455 (hepatic).

Effects of Fostamatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Digoxin (a P-Glycoprotein Substrate): Results From in Vitro and Phase I Clinical Studies.

PURPOSE: Fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor and prodrug of the active metabolite R406, is being developed as an anti-inflammatory drug for several indications for which polypharmacy is likely. Digoxin, indicated for congestive cardiac failure, may be used for certain supraventricular dysrhythmias. The studies reported herein examined whether fostamatinib and R406 are inhibitors of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro and evaluated the effect of fostamatinib on the pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin to understand drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential in the clinic. METHODS: Inhibition of P-gp-mediated digoxin transport by fostamatinib and R406 was determined across Caco-2 cell monolayers. Apparent permeability of digoxin was determined and used to calculate efflux ratios and percentage inhibition. Half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) and theoretical gastrointestinal concentration [I2] (dose in moles per 250 mL) were calculated to gauge clinical DDI potential. In a subsequent Phase I study, the plasma concentration-time profiles and resulting pharmacokinetic parameters were examined across 2 treatment periods: (1) oral digoxin loading dose of 0.25 mg BID on day 1 and 0.25 mg once daily on days 2 to 8, and (2) oral digoxin 0.25 mg once daily and oral fostamatinib 100 mg BID on days 9 to 15. FINDINGS: Fostamatinib (but not R406) was determined to be a P-gp inhibitor in vitro (IC50 = 3.2 µM). On the basis of a theoretical gastrointestinal concentration (I2)/IC50 ratio of 216 ([I2] = 691 µM), predictions indicated the potential for absorption-based DDI in vivo through inhibition of intestinal P-gp. In the clinical study, when digoxin was co-administered with fostamatinib, digoxin levels were higher before dosing and throughout the dosing interval, and an increase in exposure to digoxin was observed. Co-administration led to a 1.70-fold increase in digoxin maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) versus digoxin administration alone (2.18 vs 1.32 ng/mL). Median digoxin time of Cmax was earlier when digoxin was co-administered with fostamatinib (1.00 vs 1.48 hours). The digoxin AUC during the dosing interval at steady state was increased 1.37-fold with co-administration. No severe or serious adverse events or deaths were reported. IMPLICATIONS: Fostamatinib was confirmed to be a P-gp inhibitor in vitro and in vivo, and a DDI with digoxin was apparent. Co-administration of digoxin and fostamatinib was generally well tolerated. However, continued review of digoxin response and dose is advisable should these agents be prescribed concomitantly. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01355354.

Pharmacokinetic evaluations of the co-administrations of vandetanib and metformin, digoxin, midazolam, omeprazole or ranitidine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vandetanib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and rearranged during transfection (RET) signalling, indicated for the treatment of medullary thyroid cancer. We investigated potential drug-drug interactions between vandetanib and metformin [organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) substrate; NCT01551615]; digoxin [P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate; NCT01561781]; midazolam [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate; NCT01544140]; omeprazole (proton pump inhibitor) or ranitidine (histamine H2-receptor antagonist; both NCT01539655). METHODS: Four open-label, phase I studies were conducted in healthy volunteers: n = 14 (metformin), n = 14 (digoxin), n = 17 (midazolam), n = 16 (omeprazole), n = 18 (ranitidine). Three of these comprised the following regimens: metformin 1000 mg ± vandetanib 800 mg, midazolam 7.5 mg ± vandetanib 800 mg, or digoxin 0.25 mg ± vandetanib 300 mg. The randomized study comprised vandetanib 300 mg alone and then either (i) omeprazole 40 mg (days 1-4), and omeprazole + vandetanib (day 5); or (ii) ranitidine 150 mg (day 1), and ranitidine + vandetanib (day 2). The primary objective assessed metformin, digoxin, midazolam and vandetanib pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Vandetanib + metformin increased metformin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) by 74 and 50 %, respectively, and decreased the geometric mean metformin renal clearance (CLR) by 52 % versus metformin alone. Vandetanib + digoxin increased digoxin area under the concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last) and Cmax by 23 and 29 %, respectively, versus digoxin alone, with only a 9 % decrease in CLR. Vandetanib had no effect on midazolam exposure. Vandetanib exposure was unchanged during co-administration with omeprazole/ranitidine. Treatment combinations were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving vandetanib with metformin/digoxin may require additional monitoring of metformin/digoxin, with dose adjustments where necessary. Vandetanib with CYP3A4 substrates or omeprazole/ranitidine is unlikely to result in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Phase I study assessing the safety and tolerability of barasertib (AZD1152) with low-dose cytosine arabinoside in elderly patients with AML.

INTRODUCTION: Barasertib is the pro-drug of barasertib-hydroxy-quinazoline pyrazole anilide, a selective Aurora B kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated preliminary anti-AML activity in the clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the safety and tolerability of barasertib, combined with LDAC, in patients aged 60 years or older with de novo or secondary AML. Barasertib (7-day continuous intravenous infusion) plus LDAC 20 mg (subcutaneous injection twice daily for 10 days) was administered in 28-day cycles. The MTD was defined as the highest dose at which ≤ 1 patient within a cohort of 6 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (clinically significant adverse event [AE] or laboratory abnormality considered related to barasertib). The MTD cohort was expanded to 12 patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (median age, 71 years) received ≥ 1 treatment cycle (n = 6, 800 mg; n = 13, 1000 mg; n = 3, 1200 mg). DLTs were reported in 2 patients (both, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 stomatitis/mucositis; 1200 mg cohort). The most common AEs were infection (73%), febrile neutropenia (59%), nausea (50%), and diarrhea (46%). Barasertib plus LDAC resulted in an overall response rate (International Working Group criteria) of 45% (n = 10/22; according to investigator opinion). CONCLUSION: The MTD of 1000 mg barasertib in combination with LDAC in older patients with AML was associated with acceptable tolerability and preliminary anti-AML activity.

Phase I study of the Aurora B kinase inhibitor barasertib (AZD1152) to assess the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: Barasertib (AZD1152) is a pro-drug that rapidly undergoes phosphatase-mediated cleavage in serum to release barasertib-hQPA, a selective Aurora B kinase inhibitor that has shown preliminary activity in clinical studies of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The pharmacokinetic (PK), metabolic and excretion profiles of barasertib and barasertib-hQPA were characterized in this open-label Phase I study. METHODS: Five patients with poor prognosis AML (newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory) received barasertib 1,200 mg as a 7-day continuous infusion every 28 days. On Day 2 of Cycle 1 only, patients also received a 2-hour infusion of [(14)C]-barasertib. Blood, urine and feces samples were collected at various time points during Cycle 1. Safety and preliminary efficacy were also assessed. RESULTS: Barasertib-hQPA was extensively distributed to tissues, with a slow rate of total clearance (CL = 31.4 L/h). Overall, 72-82 % of radioactivity was recovered, with approximately double the amount recovered in feces (mean = 51 %) compared with urine (mean = 27 %). The main metabolism pathways for barasertib were (1) cleavage of the phosphate group to form barasertib-hQPA, followed by oxidation and (2) loss of the fluoroaniline moiety to form barasertib-hQPA desfluoroaniline, followed by oxidation. One of the four patients evaluable for response entered complete remission. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed; the most common adverse events were nausea and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The PK profile of barasertib is similar to previous studies using the same dosing regimen in patients with AML. The majority of barasertib-hQPA clearance occurred via hepatic metabolic routes.

Pharmacokinetics of vandetanib: three phase I studies in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Vandetanib is an orally available inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor and is rearranged during transfection tyrosine kinase activity. Development has included studies in non-small cell lung cancer and other tumor types. Accurate elimination kinetics were not determined in patient studies, and so the current human volunteer studies were performed to derive detailed kinetic data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetics, metabolism, excretion, and elimination kinetics after single oral doses of vandetanib in healthy subjects. METHODS: Three studies were conducted. In Study A (n = 23), cohorts of 8 subjects were randomized to receive double-blind, ascending doses of vandetanib (300-1200 mg) or placebo (6:2). Study B had a crossover design; subjects (n = 16) received vandetanib 300 mg under fed and fasted conditions. In Study C, subjects (n = 4) received [(14)C] vandetanib 800 mg. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis for up to 28 days after the dose (Studies A and B) and 42 days after the dose (Study C). Plasma (all studies) and urine (Study A only) samples were collected for determination of vandetanib concentrations. In Study C radioactivity was measured in plasma, blood, urine, and feces, and metabolites were identified chromatographically. Tolerability was evaluated by recording of adverse events, clinical chemistry, hematology and urinalysis parameters, vital signs, and ECGs (all studies). RESULTS: Study A: mean (SD) age 34.4 (6.9) years; 23/23 male; mean (SD; range) weight 80.6 (8.1; 62-97) kg. Study B: mean (SD) age 35.3 (8.4) years; 15/16 male; mean (SD; range) weight 80.7 (11.2; 57-100) kg. Study C: mean (SD) age 60.3 (7.4) years; 4/4 male; mean (SD; range) weight 78.0 (7.7l; 72-87) kg. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent across all studies (Studies A and C, vandetanib 800 mg: geometric mean CL/F, 13.1-13.3 L/h; geometric mean apparent volume of distribution at steady state [V(SS)/F], 3592-4103 L; mean t(½), 215.8-246.6 hours). Vandetanib was absorbed and eliminated slowly after single oral doses. AUC(0-∞) and C(max) were not significantly affected by ingestion of food. Median (range) T(max) was 8 (3-18) hours after food and 6 (5-18) hours after fasting. In plasma, concentrations of total radioactivity were higher than vandetanib concentrations at all time points, indicating the presence of circulating metabolites. Unchanged vandetanib and 2 anticipated metabolites (N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide) were detected in plasma, urine, and feces. A further trace minor metabolite (glucuronide conjugate) was found in urine and feces. Approximately two thirds of the dose was recovered in feces (44%) and urine (25%) over 21 days, underlining the importance of both routes of elimination. Adverse events were reported by all subjects in Study A apart from 2 at a vandetanib dose of 300 mg; 12/15 (80%) and 14/16 (88%) subjects who took vandetanib under fed and fasted conditions, respectively, in Study B; and 2/4 (50%) subjects in Study C. No serious adverse events were reported. Increasing doses of vandetanib, in Study A, were associated with variable increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and variable increases from baseline in QTc interval. Hematuria was reported by 3 subjects (vandetanib 300 mg) in Study A. Small but consistent increases from baseline in serum creatinine were noted in subjects who received vandetanib in these studies. No other clinically important changes were observed in clinical chemistry, hematology and urinalysis parameters, vital signs, and ECGs in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of vandetanib after single oral doses to healthy subjects were defined and the metabolic pathway was proposed. Vandetanib was absorbed and eliminated slowly with a t(½) of ∼10 days after single oral doses. The extent of absorption was not significantly affected by the presence of food. Approximately two thirds of the dose was recovered in feces (44%) and urine (25%) over 21 days. Unchanged vandetanib and N-desmethyl and N-oxide metabolites were detected in plasma, urine, and feces. Vandetanib appeared to be was well tolerated in the populations studied.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with vandetanib during coadministration with rifampicin or itraconazole.

BACKGROUND: Vandetanib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and rearranged during transfection (RET), is a developmental oncology drug, that is in part metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Clinical studies were performed to assess the potential for 3A4 inhibitors and inducers to affect exposure to vandetanib. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a potent CYP3A4 inducer, rifampicin (Study A), and a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole (Study B), on the pharmacokinetics of a single 300 mg dose of vandetanib in healthy subjects. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Two phase I, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-center studies. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Study A: 18 healthy male subjects aged 21-44 years were randomized to receive each of the following two regimens, separated by a ≥6-week washout period: (i) oral rifampicin 600 mg/day on days 1-31 with a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 10; and (ii) a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 1. Study B: 16 healthy male subjects aged 20-44 years were randomized to receive each of the following two regimens, separated by a 3-month washout period: (i) oral itraconazole 200 mg/day on days 1-24 with a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 4; and (ii) a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Blood samples for measurement of vandetanib (both studies) concentrations and its metabolites, N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide (Study A only), were collected before and at various timepoints after vandetanib administration for up to 28 days (Study A) and 37 days (Study B). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 504 hours (AUC(504)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of vandetanib were compared in the presence and absence of rifampicin, and in the presence and absence of itraconazole. RESULTS: Study A: coadministration of vandetanib with rifampicin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in AUC(504) (geometric least square [GLS]mean ratio [vandetanib + rifampicin/vandetanib alone] 0.60; 90% CI 0.58, 0.63). There was no significant difference in C(max) of vandetanib (GLSmean ratio 1.03; 90% CI 0.95, 1.11). AUC(504) and C(max) of N-desmethylvandetanib increased by 266.0% and 414.3%, respectively, in the presence of rifampicin compared with vandetanib alone. Exposure to vandetanib N-oxide was very low compared with that of vandetanib, but was increased in the presence of rifampicin. Study B: coadministration of vandetanib with itraconazole resulted in a significant increase in AUC(504) (GLSmean ratio [vandetanib + itraconazole/vandetanib alone] 1.09; 90% CI 1.01, 1.18) and no significant change in C(max) (GLSmean ratio 0.96; 90% CI 0.83, 1.11). Vandetanib was well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to vandetanib, as assessed by AUC(504) in healthy subjects, was reduced by around 40% when a single dose was given in combination with the potent CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin. Because of this, it may be appropriate to avoid coadministration of potent CYP3A4 inducers with vandetanib. Vandetanib exposure was increased by about 9% when it was taken in combination with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole. It is unlikely that coadministration of vandetanib and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors will need to be contraindicated.

An open-label, randomized, single-center, two-period, phase I, crossover study of the effect of zibotentan (ZD4054) on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Zibotentan (ZD4054) is an oral, specific endothelin A receptor antagonist presently under investigation for the treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Preclinical in vitro studies suggest that zibotentan has the potential to act as a time-dependent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 (CYP3A4) metabolic pathway. In clinical practice, it is likely that zibotentan will be coadministered with drugs metabolized by this pathway; the potential exists, therefore, that zibotentan-induced drug interactions could occur. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of zibotentan on the pharmaco-kinetics of a clinically relevant dose of midazolam in healthy volunteers. Secondary objectives were to evaluate exposure to zibotentan, ensure the safety of the healthy volunteers dosed, and investigate the effect of zibotentan on the pharmacokinetics of the midazolam metabolites 1-hydroxy midazolam and 4-hydroxy midazolam. The potency of zibotentan as a CYP3A4 inhibitor was also assessed. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, singlecenter, 2-period, Phase I, crossover study. Volunteers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 cohorts. In cohort 1, volunteers received a single dose of midazolam 7.5 mg on day 1 (treatment A) of a 2-day study period. After a minimum 7-day washout period, volunteers received zibotentan 10 mg once daily on days 1 through 7, plus a single dose of midazolam 7.5 mg on day 6 (treatment B) of a 7-day study period. In cohort 2, volunteers received treatment B followed by treatment A, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments. AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) data were expressed as geometric least squares mean ratios and 90% CIs for midazolam + zibotentan:midazolam. A moderate interaction between midazolam and zibotentan was predefined to have occurred if the upper 90% CI of the ratio was >1.5. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. AE data were assessed based on information provided by the volunteer, through open-ended and nonleading verbal questions to the volunteer at each visit, and through observation by the investigational team, other care providers, or relatives. RESULTS: Six volunteers (all white) were included in each cohort (cohort 1, mean [SD] age, 48 [7] years; mean weight, 74 [6] kg; cohort 2, mean age, 51 [11] years; mean weight, 75 [13] kg). Steady-state levels of zibotentan, achieved over 7 days, increased the midazolam AUC(0-infinity) by 1.2-fold compared with midazolam alone. The upper limits of the 90% CIs for the AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) ratios were below the predefined level of 1.5 (1.37 and 1.32, respectively). Zibotentan had no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics of 1-hydroxy midazolam and 4-hydroxy midazolam. Fatigue was reported in 11 volunteers (92%) receiving midazolam monotherapy and 10 (83%) receiving midazolam combined with zibotentan. Headache was reported in all 12 volunteers after zibotentan monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of healthy male volunteers, once-daily zibotentan 10 mg increased the AUC(0-infinity) of midazolam 1.2-fold; however, the treatment ratio was below the predefined limit for clinical significance. Zibotentan was well tolerated when given alone or in combination with midazolam. The results indicate that once-daily zibotentan 10 mg acted as a weak inhibitor of the CYP3A4 pathway. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT00709553.

Pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vandetanib, an oncology drug being evaluated in phase III clinical trials, undergoes significant renal and hepatic excretion. The objective of these two studies was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment in comparison with healthy subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two open-label, parallel-group studies were conducted at a single centre in Germany. Subjects aged 18-75 years with a body mass index of 18-32 kg/m2 were eligible. The renal impairment study recruited subjects with normal renal function and mild, moderate and severe renal impairment according to creatinine clearance calculated from a 24-hour urine collection pre-dose. The hepatic impairment study recruited subjects with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment according to the Child-Pugh classification. All subjects received a single 800 mg oral vandetanib dose. Blood samples for measurement of vandetanib, N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide were collected before and at various timepoints after vandetanib administration for up to 63 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were recruited for the renal impairment study (ten with normal renal function and six, ten and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). Thirty subjects were recruited for the hepatic impairment study (eight with normal hepatic function and eight, eight and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) values of free vandetanib increased by approximately 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. These increases were statistically significant, with the increase in the severe renal impairment group having the possibility of being double the value observed in subjects with normal renal function (geometric least squares [GLS] mean ratio [renal impairment : normal renal function] of 1.79; 90% CI 1.39, 2.31). Peak plasma concentrations of free vandetanib increased slightly by approximately 7%, 9% and 11% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Total plasma clearance of free vandetanib decreased with all degrees of renal dysfunction. Hepatic impairment did not have a statistically significant effect on the AUC(infinity) of total vandetanib. Peak plasma concentrations of total vandetanib were reduced in subjects with all classifications of hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function, with a statistically significant effect in the severe hepatic impairment group (GLS mean ratio 0.71; 90% CI 0.53, 0.96). Increased exposure to both metabolites was seen in subjects with renal impairment. Exposure to N-desmethylvandetanib was reduced in subjects with hepatic impairment, while exposure to vandetanib N-oxide was increased in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. Vandetanib was well tolerated and had a similar tolerability profile in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Exposure to vandetanib was increased by about 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. A doubling in exposure could be ruled out in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment but not for those with severe renal impairment. The possibility of dose reductions in patients with severe renal impairment will need to be assessed when the safety and tolerability profile is fully defined. Exposure to vandetanib was not altered in subjects with hepatic impairment, and no dose adjustment would be expected in patients with hepatic impairment.

Vandetanib with FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma: results from an open-label, multicentre Phase I study.

PURPOSE: The safety and tolerability of vandetanib (ZACTIMA; ZD6474) plus FOLFIRI was investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients eligible for first- or second-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) plus 14-day treatment cycles of FOLFIRI. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients received vandetanib 100 mg (n = 11) or 300 mg (n = 10) + FOLFIRI. Combination therapy was well tolerated at both vandetanib dose levels. There were no DLTs in the vandetanib 100 mg cohort and one DLT of hypertension (CTCAE grade 3) in the 300 mg cohort. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (n = 20), nausea (n = 12) and fatigue (n = 10). Two patients (one in each cohort) discontinued vandetanib due to adverse events (rash, 100 mg cohort; hypertension, 300 mg cohort). There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between vandetanib and FOLFIRI. Preliminary efficacy results included two confirmed partial responses in the 100 mg cohort and 9 patients with stable disease > or =8 weeks (100 mg, n = 7; 300 mg, n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) in combination with a standard FOLFIRI regimen was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC.

Pharmacodynamic effect of continuous vs intermittent dosing of dofetilide on QT interval.

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dofetilide 1 mg twice daily continuously for 24 days compared with intermittent single dose treatments. METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multiple-dose study design was utilized. Healthy male volunteer subjects were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received dofetilide 1.0 mg twice daily for 23 days and once on day 24. Group 2 received matching placebo capsules under the same regimen as group 1. Group 3 received a single dose of dofetilide 1.0 mg on days 1, 5, 10, 17, and 24 with identical placebo capsules administered at all other times to match the dosing pattern of the other groups. RESULTS: Continuous administration of dofetilide resulted in the achievement of steady-state concentrations by day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters following intermittent treatment showed no accumulation. Maximum daily QTc interval (mean +/- s.e. mean) increased in response to continuous twice-daily dofetilide from baseline (373 +/- 5) to day 2 (453 +/- 9) but thereafter decreased slightly, but not beyond day 5, by which time the mean maximum QTc was 440 +/- 7 ms. In contrast, single doses of dofetilide in the intermittently treated group led to reproducible increases in QTc. Thus mean (+/- s.e. mean) maximum QTc increased from a baseline of 387 +/- 7-467 +/- 14, 467 +/- 18, 469 +/- 14 and 458 +/- 10 ms on days 5, 10, 17 and 24, respectively. In view of the pharmacokinetic accumulation on continuous dosing, the attenuation of responsiveness is best represented by the slope of the QTc vs plasma concentration relationship. In the continuously treated group, an initial decrease in the value of the mean slope between day 1 (14.2 +/- 1.7 ms/ng ml(-1)) and day 5 (9.1 +/- 0.8 ms/ng ml(-1)) did not progress beyond day 5. The mean difference in slopes (95% CI) between the intermittent and continuously treated groups were 4.4 (1.3, 7.4) on day 5, 4.9 (1.6, 8.2) on day 10, 5.2 (1.1, 9.2) on day 17 and 4.4 (0.4, 8.4) on day 24. CONCLUSIONS: With continuous twice-daily administration the QT interval responsiveness to dofetilide is greater after the first dose than it is at steady state. After day 5 the relationship between dofetilide plasma concentration and its QT interval effect is predictable and stable over time.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole - a novel wide-spectrum antifungal agent.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a new triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity against clinically significant and emerging pathogens. These studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Two single-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. In Study A, 12 subjects were randomized to voriconazole (3 mg kg-1) or placebo, administered once daily on days 1 and 12, and every 12 h on days 3-11. In Study B, 18 subjects were randomized to voriconazole or placebo, with voriconazole being administered as a loading dose at 6 mg kg-1 twice on day 1, then at 3 mg kg-1 twice daily on days 2-9, and once at 3 mg kg-1 on day 10. RESULTS: In both studies, the plasma concentrations of voriconazole increased rapidly following the initiation of dosing. Minimum observed plasma concentration (Cmin) values at steady state were above the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for most fungal pathogens (Cmin > 0.8 micro g ml-1). The use of a loading dose in Study B resulted in a shorter time to steady-state Cmin values than was observed in Study A. Values of the final day plasma pharmacokinetic parameters in Studies A and B were similar: maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) 3621 and 3063 ng ml-1; areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (AUCtau) 16 535 and 13 245 ng.h ml-1, and terminal elimination phase half-lives (t1/2) 6.5 and 6.7 h, respectively. On multiple dosing, voriconazole accumulated (AUCtau accumulation ratio 2.53-3.17, Study A) at a level that was not predictable from single-dose data. The mean concentration-time profiles for voriconazole in saliva were similar to those in plasma. Multiple doses of voriconazole were well tolerated and no subject discontinued from either study. Seven cases of possibly drug-related visual disturbance were reported in three subjects (Study B). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a loading dose of 6 mg kg-1 i.v. voriconazole on the first day of treatment followed by 3 mg kg-1 i.v. twice daily achieves steady state by the third day of dosing. This dosage regimen results in plasma levels of the drug that rapidly exceed the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against important fungal pathogens, including Aspergillus spp.

Voriconazole, a novel wide-spectrum triazole: oral pharmacokinetics and safety.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a potent new triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity against clinically significant and emerging pathogens. The present study evaluated the safety, toleration, and pharmacokinetics of oral voriconazole after single and multiple dosing. METHODS: Sixty-four healthy subjects were randomized to receive treatment and 56 completed the study. Groups of eight subjects each received voriconazole doses of 2 mg kg-1 twice daily, 4 mg kg-1 once daily, 2 mg kg-1 three times daily, or 3 mg kg-1 twice daily. Eleven subjects received 1.5 mg kg-1 three times daily, and 21 subjects were administered placebo. RESULTS: Voriconazole exhibited nonlinear (dose- and time-dependent) pharmacokinetics. This deviation from linear pharmacokinetics was confirmed by linearity ratios of > 1 and decreasing kel values on multiple dosing, with a consequent increase in the terminal phase t1/2. There was also notable intersubject variability in Cmax and AUCtau. The absorption of voriconazole was rapid (mean tmax= 0.9-1.7 h) after single and multiple dosing and the decline in plasma concentration-time curves after tmax was generally biphasic. By day 12, the Cmax, AUCtau, tmax, and t1/2 values for the 3 mg kg-1 twice-daily group were 2356 ng ml-1, 11 170 ng.h ml-1, 1.1 h, and 6.4 h, respectively. The observed accumulation of voriconazole after multiple dosing was greater than predicted from single-dose data. Accumulation ratios for Cmax and AUCtau, which were 1.97 and 3.55, respectively, for the group given voriconazole 3 mg kg-1 twice daily, varied between treatment groups and appeared to be influenced by total daily dose and the frequency and duration of dosing. Visual inspection of Cmin values together with statistical analyses of Cmax and AUCtau values suggest that steady-state levels were achieved by the fifth to sixth day of multiple dosing. Plasma concentrations of voriconazole were well above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and for most emerging fungal pathogens (Cmin > 0.8 micro g ml-1). Voriconazole was well tolerated: most treatment-related adverse events (abnormal vision, headache, dizziness) were mild and resolved within an hour of dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The oral dosing regimen selected for subsequent Phase II/III clinical trials on the basis of these results was 200 mg twice daily, equivalent to 3 mg kg-1 twice daily.