Real-world cohort study of adult and pediatric patients treated for hereditary angioedema in the United States.

Background: There is limited real-world evidence on hereditary angioedema (HAE) patient characteristics and health-care resource utilization (HCRU); in addition, pediatric patients have been described in small cohorts. Objective: To describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU among adult and pediatric patients treated for HAE in a large U.S. cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used an administrative claims data base (January 2006 to September 2015). Eligible patients with either ≥1 pharmacy claim for HAE-indicated therapies (C1 inhibitors, ecallantide, icatibant) or ≥2 medical claims with codes associated with HAE (per medical billing codes), and ≥1 claim for androgens, fresh frozen plasma, tranexamic acid, or ε-aminocaproic acid formed a "treated cohort." Three nonexclusive treated cohorts were assessed: overall, pediatric, and HCRU (≥2 years of continuous enrollment during 2010-2015). Results: Overall, 1429 patients received treatment (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 38.8 ±15.7 years; 62.4% female patients; mean ± SD Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1.4 ± 2.4). Common comorbidities were allergy or anaphylaxis (51.4%) and anxiety or depression (35.8%). Diagnoses indicative of HAE attacks included swelling and/or angioedema (78.5%), abdominal pain (55.6%), and asphyxiation (27.2%). Use of HAE-indicated medication rose between 2006 and 2015 to 81.8%, whereas androgen use declined (from 91.5% to 24.9%). Similar trends were observed in the pediatric treated cohort (n = 143). In the HCRU treated cohort (n = 538), HAE-related claims for emergency department and inpatient admissions were observed for 36.6% and 22.3% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: In a large U.S. cohort of adult and pediatric patients who received treatments indicated or used for HAE, common comorbidities and trends in resource use denoted the substantial burden of attacks, which reflected a continued need that recently approved long-term prophylactic treatments may help to address.

Validating an algorithm for multiple myeloma based on administrative data using a SEER tumor registry and medical record review.

PURPOSE: Large numbers of multiple myeloma patients can be studied in real-world clinical settings using administrative databases. The validity of these studies is contingent upon accurate case identification. Our objective was to develop and evaluate algorithms to use with administrative data to identify multiple myeloma cases. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for multiple myeloma (203.0x) were identified at two study sites. At site 1, several algorithms were developed and validated by comparing results to tumor registry cases. An algorithm with a reasonable positive predictive value (PPV) (0.81) and sensitivity (0.73) was selected and then validated at site 2 where results were compared with medical chart data. The algorithm required that ICD-9-CM codes 203.0x occur before and after the diagnostic procedure codes for multiple myeloma. RESULTS: At site 1, we identified 1432 patients. The PPVs of algorithms tested ranged from 0.54 to 0.88. Sensitivities ranged from 0.30 to 0.88. At site 2, a random sample (n = 400) was selected from 3866 patients, and medical charts were reviewed by a clinician for 105 patients. Algorithm PPV was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: We identified cases of multiple myeloma with adequate validity for claims database analyses. At least two ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 203.0x preceding diagnostic procedure codes for multiple myeloma followed by ICD-9-CM codes within a specific time window after diagnostic procedure codes were required to achieve reasonable algorithm performance.

Incidence of liver injury among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in an integrated health system.

PURPOSE: Using liver laboratory tests (LLTs), Hy's law is a method used to identify drug-induced liver injury (DILI), after excluding other causes. Elevated LLTs in chemotherapy-exposed patients may result from tumor effects or comorbidities. This study evaluated incidence of Hy's law in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. METHODS: We identified breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients diagnosed in 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2007 at a Midwestern health system. Using automated data, potential Hy's law (PHL) cases were defined by patterns of elevated LLTs suggestive of DILI. Among those treated with chemotherapy, we excluded PHL patients with pre-existing conditions that could cause liver injury, producing a cohort meeting Hy's law criteria, according to automated data. Medical record review, conducted among these automated data-derived Hy's law patients, further excluded those with causes of liver injury other than chemotherapy. RESULTS: Using automated data, among chemotherapy-exposed patients (N = 2788), 91 (3.3%) met PHL criteria using LLTs and 64 (2.3%) met Hy's law after excluding underlying liver injury using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. After a medical record review, 62 of 64 patients qualifying as Hy's law through automated data had other potential causes, leaving two patients (0.07%; 95%CI: 0.01-0.24%) with chemotherapy as a likely alternative cause of liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal LLTs are common in chemotherapy-treated patients. Medical record review showed that the incidence of Hy's law events is rare. These data provide context for evaluating DILI in clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance of anticancer therapies, understanding that automated data alone may substantially overestimate the number of Hy's law cases.

Melanoma survivors: health behaviors, surveillance, psychosocial factors, and family concerns.

BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted on melanoma survivors and important opportunities exist for research in this understudied population. The study objective was to examine experiences of melanoma survivors regarding sun protection, surveillance practices, psychosocial and family concerns using focus groups. METHODS: We identified patients (≥ 18 years) treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (USA) during 1996-2005 with invasive primary cutaneous melanoma, stages I-III. We stratified focus groups by age (<50 vs ≥ 50 years) and years since diagnosis (1 to <5 years vs 5-10 years). We performed qualitative thematic text analysis, which involved independent data review by multiple analysts (n = 2) followed by interpretation of key findings via consensus work. RESULTS: Forty-eight survivors composed the final sample. Most did not conduct routine skin self-examinations. Survivors became more conscious of sun exposure and expanded their sun protection; some experienced anxiety if caught unprotected in the sun. Survivors were aware of the increased melanoma risk for family members, yet many did not discuss risk reduction. Melanoma diagnosis elevated the importance of retaining health insurance and purchasing life insurance for younger survivors. We did not identify significance difference between those diagnosed more or less recently. CONCLUSIONS: We identified areas of high priority to melanoma survivors: skin self-examination, anxiety associated with sun exposure, familial risk communication, and maintaining health insurance benefits. The implications for cancer survivors are that these behavioral data will help to design health promotion and prevention programs that are tailored to melanoma survivors' risk status.

Patient perceptions of nonmelanoma skin cancer before diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding patient perceptions of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' perceptions of skin lesions before a diagnosis of NMSC. METHODS: This was a descriptive study in a private practice setting. Patients with a previous biopsy of NMSC who presented for treatment were eligible. A self-administered questionnaire assessed what patient perceptions of lesions diagnosed as NMSCs had been before they were aware of the diagnosis. Medical records were reviewed for tumor type, size, and location. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients undergoing treatment for NMSC completed the questionnaire. The most common initial impressions of the lesion were skin cancer (20%), acne (19%), sore (10%), unknown (9%), dry skin (7%), age spot (6%), and injury (6%). Seventy-two percent of patients were the first to notice the lesion. Patients with a history of skin cancer were more likely to think the lesion was a skin cancer on initial impression (28% vs. 8%) (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how patients perceive their skin cancers may aid in targeting educational strategies and increase awareness of skin cancer risk. Our data suggest that there are important subtleties in self-identification that may need to be taken into consideration in any educational campaign targeting NMSC.

Regulatory and HTA Considerations for Development of Real-World Data Derived External Controls.

Regulators and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies are increasingly familiar with, and publishing guidance on, external controls derived from real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE). We recently conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) evaluating publicly available information on the use of RWD-derived external controls to contextualize outcomes from uncontrolled trials submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and/or select HTA bodies. The review identified several key operational and methodological aspects for which more detailed guidance and alignment within and between regulatory agencies and HTA bodies is necessary. This paper builds on the SLR findings by delineating a set of key takeaways for the responsible generation of fit-for-purpose RWE. Practical methodological and operational guidelines for designing, conducting, and reporting RWD-derived external control studies are explored and discussed. These considerations include: (i) early engagement with regulators and HTA bodies during the study planning phase; (ii) consideration of the appropriateness and comparability of external controls across multiple dimensions, including eligibility criteria, temporality, population representation, and clinical evaluation; (iii) ensuring adequate sample sizes, including hypothesis testing considerations; (iv) implementation of a clear and transparent strategy for assessing and addressing data quality, including data missingness across trials and RWD; (v) selection of comparable and meaningful endpoints that are operationalized and analyzed using appropriate analytic methods; and (vi) conduct of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of findings in the context of uncertainty and sources of potential bias.

Effectively Leveraging RWD for External Controls: A Systematic Literature Review of Regulatory and HTA Decisions.

Real-world data (RWD)-derived external controls can be used to contextualize efficacy findings for investigational therapies evaluated in uncontrolled trials. As the number of submissions to regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies using external controls rises, and in light of recent regulatory and HTA guidance on the appropriate use of RWD, there is a need to address the operational and methodological challenges impeding the quality of real-world evidence (RWE) generation and the consistency in evaluation of RWE across agencies. This systematic review summarizes publicly available information on the use of external controls to contextualize outcomes from uncontrolled trials for all indications from January 1, 2015, through August 20, 2021, that were submitted to the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, and/or select major HTA bodies (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), and Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA)). By systematically reviewing submissions to regulatory and HTA bodies in the context of recent guidance, this study provides quantitative and qualitative insights into how external control design and analytic choices may be viewed by different agencies in practice. The primary operational and methodological aspects identified for discussion include, but are not limited to, engagement of regulators and HTA bodies, approaches to handling missing data (a component of data quality), and selection of real-world endpoints. Continued collaboration and guidance to address these and other aspects will inform and assist stakeholders attempting to generate evidence using external controls.

Cardiovascular outcomes in women with advanced breast cancer exposed to chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To quantify incidence of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving cardiotoxic and non-cardiotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: This study identified all women at a Midwestern health system with initial diagnosis of American Joint Commission on Cancer Stage III/IV breast cancer (1995-2003) and random sample of 50 women initially diagnosed with Stage I/II who progressed to Stage III/IV. The rate of new cardiovascular outcomes (heart failure, dysrhythmia, and ischemia events) for cardiotoxic (anthracycline or trastuzumab) and non-cardiotoxic agents was calculated. RESULTS: Of 315 patients, 90.5% (n = 285) received systemic cancer therapy; 67.7% (n = 193) received cardiotoxic drugs. Older patients were less likely to receive cardiotoxic agents (86.4%, ≤59 years vs. 31.9%, 70+ years). Adjusting for age, race, stage, surgery/radiation, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status, and diagnosis year, rate of new cardiac events was higher in patients exposed to cardiotoxic drugs compared with those exposed to non-cardiotoxic drugs (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.5, 95%CI = 0.9-7.2). Patients with cardiac event history (relative risk = 3.2, 95%CI = 2.0-5.1) and those with heart failure history (relative risk = 5.9, 95%CI = 2.4-14.6) were more likely to receive non-cardiotoxic treatment. Heart failure events occurred steadily over time; after 3 years of follow-up, 16% exposed to cardiotoxic drugs experienced an event, and 8% of those exposed to non-cardiotoxic drugs experienced an event. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiac comorbidity are less likely to receive cardiotoxic agents. Use of cardiotoxic agents is common; treatment is related to patient and tumor characteristics and is associated with substantial risk of cardiotoxicity that persists during patients' remaining lifespan.

Assessing the incidence of osteosarcoma among teriparatide-treated patients using linkage of commercial pharmacy and state cancer registry data, contributing to the removal of boxed warning and other labeling changes.

BACKGROUND: Teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone analogue, is associated with increased bone mineral density and a decreased risk of fractures. A dose-dependent increase in the incidence of osteosarcoma was observed in toxicology studies conducted in rats. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of osteosarcoma over a 10-year period among teriparatide-treated patients versus patients unexposed to teriparatide with osteoporosis and patients in the general population using national pharmacy dispensing data linked with data from participating state cancer registries (SCRs) in the US. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with a dispensed teriparatide prescription formed two different cohorts: Teriparatide-Osteoporosis (Teriparatide-OP) was formed by matching teriparatide patients to unexposed patients with osteoporosis and Teriparatide-General Population (Teriparatide-GP) was formed by matching teriparatide patients to general population patients with a dispensed prescription for a medication other than teriparatide. Matching was performed using select demographics and other variables. Study cohorts were linked to SCR data to ascertain osteosarcoma status. To account for missing outcome data from non-participating SCRs, two analytic approaches were used: the first adjusted the person-time at-risk using a coverage fraction and the second restricted the analyses to patients from states with participating SCRs. RESULTS: There were 18 osteosarcoma cases across four study cohorts: the same three cases in the Teriparatide-OP and Teriparatide-GP cohorts, six cases in the Osteoporosis cohort, and nine cases in the General Population cohort. For the analysis using the coverage fraction the incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the Teriparatide-OP and Teriparatide-GP cohorts to the Osteoporosis and General Population cohorts was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.2, 4.5) and 1.3 (95% CI: 0.2, 5.1), respectively. When restricting the analysis to patients from states with participating SCRs, the IRR was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.1, 3.6) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.1, 4.0), respectively. CONCLUSION: The estimates of association between teriparatide and osteosarcoma were imprecise due to the small number of observed osteosarcoma cases. However, the incidence of osteosarcoma observed in each study cohort was within the expected range given background rates for the US general population. The evidence generated by this study, in conjunction with other real-world studies evaluating the risk of osteosarcoma, was used to support changes to the US teriparatide label (including removal of the black box warning regarding potential risk of osteosarcoma) and expand treatment options for patients with osteoporosis.

Reducing mortality in individuals at high risk for advanced melanoma through education and screening.

Incidence and mortality rates of melanoma throughout most of the developed world have increased in the past 25 years. We propose that reduction of deaths from melanoma can be best enhanced by strong collaborations between experts in dermatology, primary care, oncology, cancer education and health systems research, epidemiologists, and behavioral scientists, among others. Public and professional educational campaigns should be guided by an understanding of 3 underlying but overlapping roots: epidemiology and preventable mortality (an understanding of who is most likely to be given the diagnosis of thick or late-stage melanoma), biology (an investigation of tumor types that are relatively common but potentially most lethal), and sociology (an analysis of the changes needed in social structures to improve access to those most in need of early detection programs). We review these major concepts, concentrating on the key risk factors for advanced melanoma.

Association between second-generation antipsychotics and newly diagnosed treated diabetes mellitus: does the effect differ by dose?

BACKGROUND: The benefits of some second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) must be weighed against the increased risk for diabetes mellitus. This study examines whether the association between SGAs and diabetes differs by dose. METHODS: Patients were ≥18 years of age from three US healthcare systems and exposed to an SGA for ≥45 days between November 1, 2002 and March 31, 2005. Patients had no evidence of diabetes before index date and no previous antipsychotic prescription filled within 3 months before index date.49,946 patients were exposed to SGAs during the study period. Person-time exposed to antipsychotic dose (categorized by tertiles for each drug) was calculated. Newly treated diabetes was identified using pharmacy data to determine patients exposed to anti-diabetic therapies. Adjusted hazard ratios for diabetes across dose tertiles of SGA were calculated using the lowest dose tertile as reference. RESULTS: Olanzapine exhibited a dose-dependent relationship for risk for diabetes, with elevated and progressive risk across intermediate (diabetes rate per 100 person-years = 1.9; adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR), 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-3.1) and top tertile doses (diabetes rate per 100 person-years = 2.7; adjusted HR, 2.5, 95% CI, 1.4-4.5). Quetiapine and risperidone exhibited elevated risk at top dose tertile with no evidence of increased risk at intermediate dose tertile. Unlike olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, neither aripiprazole nor ziprasidone were associated with risk of diabetes at any dose tertile. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multi-site epidemiologic study, within each drug-specific stratum, the risk of diabetes for persons exposed to olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine was dose-dependent and elevated at therapeutic doses. In contrast, in aripiprazole-specific and ziprasidone-specific stratum, these newer agents were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes and dose-dependent relationships were not apparent. Although, these estimates should be interpreted with caution as they are imprecise due to small numbers.

Use of and beliefs about total body photography and dermatoscopy among US dermatology training programs: an update.

BACKGROUND: Total body photography (TBP) and dermatoscopy are imaging techniques used to treat patients with pigmented lesions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe use, training, logistics, and beliefs about these tools among residency programs and to assess changes during a 10-year period. METHODS: Surveys were sent to all directors (n = 111) and chief residents (n = 109) of US dermatology training programs. RESULTS: A total of 83 (74.8%) attendings answered the questionnaire. In all, 59 (71.1%) reported using TBP, an 11.9% increase (P = .2484) over the past decade. Reasons for using TBP included: reduces patient anxiety (81.4%), helps detect early melanoma (78.0%), and leads to fewer biopsies (66.1%). Logistical (79.2%) and financial (45.8%) constraints were reasons for not using TBP. Seventy respondents (84.3%) reported using dermatoscopy, a 40.0% increase (P = .0001) over the 10-year period. Reasons for dermatoscopy use were consistent over time: helps find melanoma in curable stage (75.7%), reduces patient anxiety (61.4%), and leads to fewer biopsies (57.1%). The most common reason for not using dermatoscopy remained lack of training (38.5%). A total of 92 (84.4%) residents completed their survey, of which 41 (44.6%) and 81 (88.0%) reported using TBP and dermatoscopy, respectively. In all, 62 (67.4%) and 79 (85.9%) respondents would prefer additional training in TBP and dermatoscopy, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Results may not be applicable to the general dermatology community. CONCLUSIONS: Use of dermatoscopy among residency programs has increased significantly during the last decade. A more modest increase in the use of TBP was observed. Barriers to diffusion of these technologies into practice persist, including insufficient logistics and training.

Epidemiologic study of aripiprazole use and the incidence of suicide events.

PURPOSE: Because second generation antipsychotics (SGA) might affect the risk of suicide, systematic assessment of suicide risk associated with SGA in the postmarketing setting is important and of interest to regulatory authorities. To fulfill a postmarketing request, our objective was to determine suicide event (attempted or completed) incidence in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, prescribed aripiprazole. METHODS: Using administrative data from three US sources, we assessed study endpoints of suicide attempts and death by suicide in patients aged ≥18 enrolled continuously for ≥3 months in their health plans before receiving their first ever antipsychotic (November 2002-December 2005). RESULTS: Among 20 489 antipsychotic users (8985 patient-years), unadjusted suicide event rates (per 1000 patient-years) were: 20.69 (aripiprazole); 23.99 (olanzapine); 32.33 (quetiapine); 19.69 (risperidone); 48.52 (ziprasidone). Compared with current users of other SGA combined, aripiprazole users did not have an increased risk of suicide events (crude hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.48-1.30; adjusted HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.42-1.14-(controlling for study site, age, sex, index prescription year, antipsychotic use history, other pharmacotherapy exposure, comorbidity presence, schizophrenia/bipolar disorder, suicide attempts, number inpatient/outpatient encounters). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multi-site study, compared with other SGA combined, aripiprazole is not associated with an increased risk of suicide events in an inception cohort of patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes indicative of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

Study of Nevi in Children (SONIC): baseline findings and predictors of nevus count.

The authors report baseline findings and predictors of nevus count (log total nevi) at the completion of year 1 (2004) of the first known population-based, prospective study of nevi in a US cohort of children. Overall, 64% (n = 443/691) of grade 5 students and their parents in Framingham, Massachusetts, completed surveys and underwent digital photography. Total nevus count was associated with skin and hair color and tendency to burn, as measured by a sun sensitivity index. In multivariate analyses, male gender (rate ratio (RR) = 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22, 1.55; P < 0.0001), spending 5-6 weekly hours outdoors between 10 AM and 4 PM (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.28; P = 0.051), getting a painful sunburn once (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.57; P = 0.073) and at least twice (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.82; P = 0.061), and wearing a shirt at the beach or pool rarely (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.54; P = 0.005), sometimes (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.57; P = 0.041), and often and always (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.54; P = 0.001) were associated with increased number of nevi. Identifying factors that predict the development of nevi will improve primary prevention efforts during early life.

Sun protection and skin self-examination in melanoma survivors.

OBJECTIVES: Patients diagnosed with melanoma are at risk for developing recurrent and second primary disease. Skin self-examination (SSE) and sun protection are standard clinical recommendations to minimize risk. In this study we examined performance of these behaviors in individuals with melanoma drawn from the general population. METHODS: Potential participants (N=148) with a first primary melanoma diagnosed in 2000 were identified through a population-based cancer registry in New Jersey, USA. One hundred and fifteen individuals participated in a 30 min telephone interview concerning behavioral adherence with SSE and sun protection, self-efficacy for performing these behaviors, and perceived risk of developing another skin cancer. We utilized logistic regression to estimate potential associations of demographic, medical, and psychosocial factors with SSE and sun protection, respectively. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of subjects reported performing comprehensive SSE at least once every two months and 23% engaged in regular sun protection. Utilization of SSE was related to the presence of moles (OR=4.2, 95% CI: 1.1-15) and higher SSE self-efficacy (OR=14.4, 95% CI: 1.9-112). Regular sun protection was related to older age (>60 years; OR=3.3, 95% CI: 1.3-8.7), being female (OR=2.8, 95% CI: 1.1-7.3), and higher sun protection self-efficacy (OR=5.0, 95% CI: 1.4-18). These factors remained significant in multivariate models. CONCLUSION: In this group of primary melanoma survivors, the rates of SSE and sun protection are comparable to, but do not exceed, general population estimates. This study provides justification for further research to address barriers to prevention and control behaviors in melanoma survivors.

The incidence of diabetes in atypical antipsychotic users differs according to agent--results from a multisite epidemiologic study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between atypical antipsychotics, including the newer agents, aripiprazole and ziprasidone, and newly treated diabetes, using the largest post-marketing cohort of patients exposed to these newer treatments that has been studied to date. METHODS: Identified two overlapping cohorts-a simple cohort (all antipsychotic users) and an inception cohort (new users of antipsychotics)-using automated data from three United States sites (60.4 million covered lives). Patients exposed to antipsychotics > or = 45 days were identified and followed for incident diagnoses of treated diabetes. Data analysis accounted for drug switching and non-consistent drug use. RESULTS: In the 55 287-member inception cohort, 357 cases of newly treated diabetes were identified. Compared with current use of typical antipsychotics, current users of aripiprazole (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-1.76), quetiapine (aHR 1.04, 95%CI, 0.67-1.62), risperidone (aHR 0.85, 95%CI, 0.54-1.36) and ziprasidone (aHR 1.05, 95%CI, 0.54-2.08) had similar low risk of diabetes. Patients exposed to olanzapine had an increased risk of diabetes (aHR 1.71, 95%CI, 1.12-2.61), and although the effect estimate is imprecise, clozapine-exposed patients had a trend towards an elevated hazard ratio (aHR 2.58, 95%CI, 0.76-8.80). Results for the simple cohort were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to typical antipsychotics, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone and quetiapine were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes; olanzapine and clozapine were associated with an increased risk. This analysis constitutes the largest post-marketing pharmacoepidemiologic study to date that includes the newer agents.

Awareness of, and Compliance with, Domperidone Revised Labeling After a Risk-Minimization Activity in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Risk-minimization measures (RMM), including label revisions were implemented in Europe for domperidone because of evidence of increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. In accordance with the guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices, the European Medicines Agency Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee requested to conduct two studies to evaluate the effectiveness of these risk minimization measures. METHODS: In Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, surveys were conducted to assess physicians' knowledge on the updated domperidone labeling information, and a drug-utilization study (DUS) was conducted using healthcare databases to assess domperidone prescribing patterns before and after the RMM. Four DUS sensitivity analyses (scenarios) evaluated uncertainty regarding domperidone treatment duration and indication. RESULTS: Among 1805 physicians participating in the survey, most were aware of the approved indication (nausea and vomiting, 80%), treatment duration (≤ 7 days, 70%), and maximum adult daily dose (10 mg three times daily, 84%). Only 33% selected the on-label indication from a list of indications for which they would prescribe domperidone. Awareness was low for medications contraindicated for concomitant use (26%) and contraindicated conditions (4%). In the DUS, under the optimistic scenario, a large improvement in labeling compliance from pre- to post-implementation period was observed in France (27% vs. 69%), while Belgium, Germany, Spain, and the UK showed small improvements (< 10%). In the other scenarios, there was little to no improvement in compliance with the revised labeling from the pre- to post-implementation periods in most countries. CONCLUSIONS: The survey findings documented that most physicians in all five countries were aware of the main aspects of the revised labeling. Results of the DUS were inconclusive regarding the effect of the RMM and compliance with the revised labeling for all countries except France.

Treatment patterns, adherence, and persistence among psoriasis patients treated with biologics in a real-world setting, overall and by disease severity.

PURPOSE: Describe treatment patterns by disease severity among biologic-treated psoriasis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected our study cohort in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus adjudicated claims database linked to Electronic Health Record data from Modernizing Medicine Data Services. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe psoriasis based on a hierarchy of available severity measures. Patients were followed for 360 days to assess combination therapy, therapy switching and restarting, adherence and persistence. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 2130 biologic-treated patients (mean age: 47.6 years; 45.4% female); 447 (21%) had available disease severity measures. Compared to patients with mild (N = 282) psoriasis, more patients with moderate (N = 116) or severe (N = 49) disease used combination therapy (21.3% vs. 34.5% and 32.7%, respectively), switched therapies (12.1% vs. 19.8% and 22.4%), and discontinued biologics (18.4% vs. 27.6% and 36.7%). Mean adherence was <75% by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) (73.9%) and Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) (70.2%). Overall, 52.2% had a mean MPR >80%. Mean persistence to biologics was 297.6 days. Persistence and adherence decreased with increasing disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic-treated psoriasis patients had inadequate adherence (i.e., MPR <80%) and modest persistence to biologics, with moderate and severe patients demonstrating lower adherence and persistence than mild patients.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among psoriasis patients treated with biologics, overall and by disease severity.

AIMS: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among biologic-treated psoriasis patients in the US, overall and by disease severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IQVIA PharMetrics Plus administrative claims data were linked with Modernizing Medicine Data Services Electronic Health Record data and used to select adult psoriasis patients between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014. Eligible patients were classified by disease severity (mild, moderate, severe) using a hierarchy of available clinical measures. One-year outcomes included all-cause and psoriasis-related outpatient, emergency department, inpatient, and pharmacy HCRU and costs. RESULTS: This study identified 2,130 biologic-treated psoriasis patients: 282 (13%) had mild, 116 (5%) moderate, and 49 (2%) severe disease; 1,683 (79%) could not be classified. The mean age was 47.6 years; 45.4% were female. Relative to mild psoriasis patients, patients with moderate or severe disease had more median all-cause outpatient encounters (28.0 [mild] vs 32.0 [moderate], 36.0 [severe]), more median psoriasis-related outpatient encounters (6.0 [mild] vs 7.5 [moderate], 8.0 [severe]), and a higher proportion of overall claims for medications that were psoriasis-related (28% [mild] vs 37% [moderate], 34% [severe]). Relative to mild psoriasis patients, patients with moderate or severe disease had higher median all-cause total costs ($37.7k [mild] vs $42.3k [moderate], $49.3k [severe]), higher median psoriasis-related total costs ($32.7k [mild] vs $34.9k [moderate], $40.5k [severe]), higher median all-cause pharmacy costs ($33.9k [mild] vs $36.5k [moderate], $36.4k [severe]), and higher median psoriasis-related pharmacy costs ($32.2k [mild] vs $33.9k [moderate], $35.6k [severe]). LIMITATIONS: The assessment of psoriasis disease severity may not have necessarily coincided with the timing of biologic use. The definition of disease severity prevented the assessment of temporality, and may have introduced selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic-treated patients with moderate or severe psoriasis cost the healthcare system more than patients with mild psoriasis, primarily driven by higher pharmacy costs and more outpatient encounters.