Hydroxychloroquine and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Some studies have reported a decrease in CVD in patients with RA using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Most of these have had fewer participants and have analyzed only composite outcomes. We aimed to identify the association between the use of HCQ in patients with RA and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), cerebral infarction, and AMI. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using the TriNetX Diamond Network. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to equilibrate the cohorts. The dependent variables in our study were MACE, cerebral infarction, and AMI. RESULTS: A total of 2,261,643 patients with RA were identified. Approximately 6% had been prescribed HCQ. Of those prescribed HCQ, 80% (112,743) were females, while of those not prescribed HCQ, 72.5% (1,536,937) were females. HCQ was associated with lower rates of MACE (HR 0.827, 95%CI 0.8,0.86), cerebral infarction (HR 0.824, 95% CI 0.78,0.87), and AMI (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.85,0.96). These associations were not seen in patients taking biologics. HCQ was associated with lower MACE in all other subgroups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, HCQ was slightly beneficial in decreasing MACE and cerebral infarction in patients with RA. These associations were significantly lower in patients taking methotrexate or biologics. Although there was a significant decrease in the risk of AMI in all patients with RA, these results were not replicated in subgroup analyses, and there was an apparent increased risk of AMI with the use of HCQ in patients using biologics.

Nationwide trends of balloon pulmonary angioplasty and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (2012-2019).

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a sequela of a pulmonary embolus that occurs in approximately 1%-3% of patients. Pulmonary thromboendoarterectomy (PTE) can be a curative procedure, but balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an option for poor surgical candidates. We used the National Inpatient Sample to query patients who underwent PTE or BPA between 2012 and 2019 with CTEPH. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, tracheostomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Outcomes were compared between low- and high-volume centers, defined as 5 and 10 procedures per year for BPA and PTE, respectively. During our study period, 870 BPA and 2395 PTE were performed. There was a 328% relative increase in the number of PTE performed during the study period. Adverse events for BPA were rare. There was an increase in the primary composite outcome for low-volume centers compared to high-volume centers for PTE (24.4% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.003). Patients with hospitalizations for PTE in low-volume centers were more likely to have prolonged mechanical ventilation (20.0%% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001) and tracheostomy (7.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.017). In summary, PTE rates have been rising over the past 10 years, while BPA rates have remained stable. While adverse outcomes are rare for BPA, patients with hospitalizations at low-volume centers for PTE were more likely to have adverse outcomes. For patients undergoing treatment of CTEPH with BPA or PTE, referral to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary teams should be encouraged for optimal outcomes.

Impact of hospital transfer to hubs on outcomes of cardiogenic shock in the real world.

AIMS: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant mortality, and there is a movement towards regional 'hub-and-spoke' triage systems to coordinate care and resources. Limited data exist on outcomes of patients treated at CS transfer hubs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiogenic shock hospitalizations were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010-2014. Centres receiving any interhospital transfers with CS in a given year were classified as CS transfer 'hubs'; those without transfers were classified as 'spokes.' In-hospital mortality was compared among three cohorts: (A) direct admissions to spokes, (B) direct admissions to hubs, and (C) interhospital transfer to hubs. Among hospitals treating CS, 70.6% were classified as spokes and 29.4% as hubs. A total of 130 656 (31.7%) hospitalizations with CS were direct admission to spokes, 253 234 (61.4%) were direct admissions to hubs, and 28 777 (7.0%) were transfer to hubs. CS mortality was 47.8% at spoke hospitals and was lower at hub hospitals, both for directly admitted (39.3%, P < 0.01) and transferred (33.4%, P < 0.01) patients. Hospitalizations at hubs had higher procedural frequency (including coronary artery bypass graft, right heart catheterization, mechanical circulatory support), greater length of stay, and greater costs. On multivariable analysis, direct admission to CS hubs [odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.89, P < 0.01] and transfer to hubs (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.76, P < 0.01) were both associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: While acknowledging the limited ability of the Nationwide Readmissions Database to classify CS severity on presentation, treatment of CS at transfer hubs was associated with significantly lower mortality within this large real-world sample.