RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the use of a dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma operating room (OR) resulted in shorter wait times, decreased surgical times, decreased length of stay (LOS), and decreased complications in children treated with urgent surgical intervention for supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study at a level I pediatric trauma center included patients younger than 12 years with supracondylar humerus fractures urgently treated with closed or open reduction and percutaneous pinning. Index surgical cases from April 28, 2013, to February 26, 2020, were included. Patients with prior humerus fracture, concomitant injuries, open fracture, pulseless supracondylar fracture, or missing data were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on the type of OR: dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma OR or typical daytime orthopaedic OR. The primary outcome was time from presentation to surgery. Secondary outcomes included surgical time, complications, and LOS. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients with a mean age of 5 ± 2 (range: 1 to 11) years and a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 2.1 (range: 0.5 to 25.0) months were included, of whom 137 patients (34%) underwent surgery in the early morning dedicated orthopaedic trauma OR. The dedicated early morning orthopaedic OR group had significantly less time from presentation to surgery (7.5 versus 9.4 hours; P = 0.0002) and shorter LOS (21.0 versus 24.0 hours; P = 0.004) compared with children treated in the typical daytime orthopaedic OR. Surgical time (31.1 versus 32.6 minutes; P = 0.40) and complication rates (5.8% versus 4.9%; P = 0.65) were similar between the groups. No revision surgery was required in either group. DISCUSSION: Surgical wait times were diminished with use of the dedicated early morning OR, as was LOS. Surgical times and complication rates were similar between groups. Institutions may consider adopting a dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma OR to improve surgical wait times and decrease LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with spina bifida (SB) are more susceptible to obesity due to impaired mobility. There is limited access to physical activity for this population. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a mobile health app in a weight management program for AYA with SB. This was determined by measuring program adherence, active use of the app (defined as ≥3 uses per week), and user rating of the Pt Pal™ mobile app. Secondary outcomes were changes in BMI, quality of life, and health behavior, and the number of active participants over time. METHODS: Patients from the SB Clinic of a large metropolitan hospital between the ages of 11-21 years and overweight were invited to participate. The program consisted of group nutrition sessions and an individualized exercise plan using a mobile app with coaching. Outcome measures were program adherence, changes in BMI, and validated survey responses. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fifteen participants enrolled, and ten participants completed the program. Five of the ten participants attended the nutrition sessions. The number of active app users declined after the first week. Seventy percent of participants decreased their BMI. Most participants reported the program improved their ability to exercise regularly, eat a healthier diet and feel more self-confident. Peds QL™ psychosocial health domains increased postintervention. The YRBS showed increased physical activity and less sedentary time postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: This mobile app-based weight management program with coaching implemented may not be feasible for adoption in the general population of AYA with SB; however, it was well received by some, and further testing is needed to determine how to improve feasibility. This study provides useful information to guide future programs utilizing digital health and coaching.