RESUMO
The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support in various clinical scenarios has been increasing consistently, despite the lack of sufficient evidence regarding its benefit and safety from adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Although the ARREST trial (Advanced Reperfusion Strategies for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation) and a secondary analysis of the PRAGUE OHCA trial (Prague Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) provided some evidence in favor of VA-ECMO in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the INCEPTION trial (Early Initiation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) has not found a relevant improvement of short-term mortality with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, the results of the recently published ECLS-SHOCK trial (Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock) and ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) discourage the routine use of VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Ongoing clinical trials (ANCHOR [Assessment of ECMO in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock, NCT04184635], REVERSE [Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock, NCT03431467], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO, NCT05577195], PIONEER [Hemodynamic Support With ECMO and IABP in Elective Complex High-risk PCI, NCT04045873]) may clarify the usefulness of VA-ECMO in specific patient subpopulations and the efficacy of combined mechanical circulatory support strategies. Pending further data to refine patient selection and management recommendations for VA-ECMO, it remains uncertain whether the present usage of this device improves outcomes.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Infarto do Miocárdio , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently have coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Usually, PCI and TAVI are performed in two separate procedures and current studies are investigating potential benefits regarding the order. However, the two interventions may also be performed simultaneously, thereby limiting the risk associated with repeated vascular access. Data evaluating benefit and harm of concomitant procedures are scarce. AIMS: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate concomitant PCI (coPCI) in TAVI patients regarding Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) endpoints and long-term mortality. METHODS: A total of 2233 consecutive TAVI patients from the EVERY-VALVE registry were analyzed according to the VARC-3 endpoint definitions. A total of 274 patients had undergone TAVI and concomitant PCI (coPCI group). They were compared to 226 TAVI patients who had received PCI within 60 days before TAVI in a stepwise approach (swPCI group) and to the remaining 1733 TAVI patients who had not undergone PCI recently (noPCI group). RESULTS: Overall median age was 81.4 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.0%. Patients in the coPCI and in the swPCI group were predominantly male with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction. Rates of VARC-3 composite endpoints technical success and 30-day device success were comparable between all three groups. Mortality rates at 3 years after TAVI were similar (coPCI, 34.2% vs. swPCI, 31.9% vs. noPCI, 34.0% p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: coPCI during TAVI seems comparable in a retrospective analysis. Compared to a stepwise approach, it has similar rates of composite endpoints technical success and device success as well as long-term mortality.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The Impella device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump that is currently used for (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) left ventricular unloading (combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella concept), (3) high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, (4) ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and (5) treatment of right ventricular failure. Impella-assisted forward blood flow increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, peripheral tissue perfusion, and coronary blood flow in observational studies and some randomized trials. However, because of the need for large-bore femoral access (14 F for the commonly used Impella CP device) and anticoagulation, the incidences of bleeding and ischemic complications are as much as 44% and 18%, respectively. Hemolysis is reported in as many as 32% of patients and stroke in as many as 13%. Despite the rapidly growing use of the Impella device, there are still insufficient data on its effect on outcome and complications on the basis of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The only 2 small and also underpowered randomized controlled trials in cardiogenic shock comparing Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump did not show improved mortality. Several larger randomized controlled trials are currently recruiting patients or are in preparation in cardiogenic shock (DanGer Shock [Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock Trial; NCT01633502]), left ventricular unloading (DTU-STEMI [Door-To-Unload in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT03947619], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO], and REVERSE [A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO; NCT03431467]) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PROTECT IV [Impella-Supported PCI in High-Risk Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Left Ventricular Function; NCT04763200]).
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Choque Cardiogênico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: The impact of devices for vessel closure on the safety and efficacy of cannula removal in VA-ECMO patients is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 180 consecutive patients weaned from VA-ECMO after cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock from January 2012 to June 2020. In the first period (historical technique group), from January 2012 to December 2018, primary decannulation strategy was manual compression. In the second period (current technique group), from January 2019 to June 2020, decannulation was performed either by a conventional approach with manual compression or by a suture-mediated closure device technique. Results: A femoral compression system was necessary in 71% of patients in the historical group compared to 39% in the current technique group (p < 0.01). Vascular surgery was performed in 12% in the historical cohort and 2% in the current technique cohort, which indicated a clear trend, albeit it did not reach significance (p = 0.07). Conclusion: We illustrated that a suture-mediated closure device technique for VA-ECMO decannulation was feasible, safe, and may have reduced the need of surgical interventions compared to manual compression alone.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , SuturasRESUMO
While previous reports showed ADP-induced platelet reactivity to be an independent predictor of bleeding after PCI in stable patients, this has never been investigated in patients with cardiogenic shock. The association of bleeding events with respect to ADP-induced platelet aggregation was investigated in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and with available on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation measurements. Out of 233 patients, 74 suffered from a severe BARC3 or higher bleed. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly lower in patients with BARC≥3 bleedings (p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation as an independent risk factor for bleeding (HR = 0.968 per AU). An optimal cutoff value of <12 AU for ADP-induced platelet aggregation to predict BARC≥3 bleedings was identified via ROC analysis. Moreover, the use of VA-ECMO (HR 1.972) or coaxial left ventricular pump (HR 2.593), first lactate (HR 1.093 per mmol/l) and thrombocyte count (HR 0.994 per G/l) were independent predictors of BARC≥3 bleedings. In conclusion, lower on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation was independently associated with severe bleeding events in patients with AMI-CS. The value of platelet function testing for bleeding risk prediction and guidance of anti-thrombotic treatment in cardiogenic shock warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Difosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Hemorragia/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Feminino , Hemorragia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/patologia , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: Mitral stenosis with extensive mitral annular calcification (MAC) remains surgically challenging in respect to clinical outcome. Prolonged surgery time with imminent ventricular rupture and systolic anterior motion can be considered as a complex of causal factors. The aim of our alternative hybrid approach was to reduce the risk of annual rupture and paravalvular leaks and to avoid obstruction of the outflow tract. A review of the current literature was also carried out. Materials and Methods: Six female patients (mean age 76 ± 9 years) with severe mitral valve stenosis and severely calcified annulus underwent an open implantation of an Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis on cardiopulmonary bypass. Our hybrid approach involved resection of the anterior mitral leaflet, placement of anchor sutures and the deployment of a balloon expanded prosthesis under visual control. Concomitant procedures were carried out in three patients. Results: The mean duration of cross-clamping was 95 ± 31 min and cardiopulmonary bypass was 137 ± 60 min. The perioperative TEE showed in three patients an inconspicuous, heart valve-typical gradient on all implanted prostheses and a clinically irrelevant paravalvular leakage occurred in the anterior annulus. In the left ventricular outflow tract, mild to moderately elevated gradients were recorded. No adverse cerebrovascular events and pacemaker implantations were observed. All but one patient survived to discharge. Survival at one year was 83.3%. Conclusions: This "off label" implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis may be considered as a suitable bail-out approach for patients at high-risk for mitral valve surgery or deemed inoperable due to extensive MAC.
Assuntos
Calcinose , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas , Estenose da Valva Mitral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Calcinose/complicações , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Mitral/complicações , Estenose da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used to treat cardiogenic shock. However, VA-ECMO might hamper myocardial recovery. The Impella unloads the left ventricle. This study aimed to evaluate whether left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO was associated with lower mortality. METHODS: Data from 686 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO with or without left ventricular unloading using an Impella at 16 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were collected. The association between left ventricular unloading and 30-day mortality was assessed by Cox regression models in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS: Left ventricular unloading was used in 337 of the 686 patients (49%). After matching, 255 patients with left ventricular unloading were compared with 255 patients without left ventricular unloading. In the matched cohort, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.98]; P=0.03) without differences in various subgroups. Complications occurred more frequently in patients with left ventricular unloading: severe bleeding in 98 (38.4%) versus 45 (17.9%), access site-related ischemia in 55 (21.6%) versus 31 (12.3%), abdominal compartment in 23 (9.4%) versus 9 (3.7%), and renal replacement therapy in 148 (58.5%) versus 99 (39.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In this international, multicenter cohort study, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO, despite higher complication rates. These findings support use of left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO and call for further validation, ideally in a randomized, controlled trial.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Internacionalidade , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Cardiogenic shock is still a major driver of mortality on intensive care units and complicates â¼10% of acute coronary syndromes with contemporary mortality rates up to 50%. In the meantime, percutaneous circulatory support devices, in particular venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), have emerged as an established salvage intervention for patients in cardiogenic shock. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides temporary circulatory support until other treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridge to ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation, or decision-making. In this critical care perspective, we provide a concise overview of VA-ECMO utilization in cardiogenic shock, considering rationale, critical care management, as well as weaning aspects. We supplement previous literature by focusing on therapeutic issues related to the vicious circle of retrograde aortic VA-ECMO flow, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, insufficient LV unloading, and severe pulmonary congestion limiting prognosis in a relevant proportion of patients receiving VA-ECMO treatment. We will outline different modifications in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support to meet this challenge. Besides a strategy of running ECMO at lowest possible flow rates, novel therapeutic options including the combination of VA-ECMO with percutaneous microaxial pumps or implementation of a venoarteriovenous-ECMO configuration based on an additional venous cannula supplying towards pulmonary circulation are most promising among LV unloading and venting strategies. The latter may even combine the advantages of venovenous and venoarterial ECMO therapy, providing potent respiratory and circulatory support at the same time. However, whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality has to be evaluated in the urgently needed, ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134), ANCHOR (NCT04184635), and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). These studies will provide the opportunity to investigate indication, mode, and effect of LV unloading in dedicated sub-analyses. In future, the Heart Teams should aim at conducting a dedicated randomized trial comparing VA-ECMO support with vs. without LV unloading strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Circulação Pulmonar , Choque Cardiogênico/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the greatest anti-ischaemic benefit of potent antiplatelet drugs over the less potent clopidogrel occurs early, while most excess bleeding events arise during chronic treatment. Hence, a stage-adapted treatment with potent platelet inhibition in the acute phase and de-escalation to clopidogrel in the maintenance phase could be an alternative approach. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment from prasugrel to clopidogrel guided by platelet function testing (PFT). METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre trial (TROPICAL-ACS) done at 33 sites in Europe, patients were enrolled if they had biomarker-positive acute coronary syndrome with successful PCI and a planned duration of dual antiplatelet treatment of 12 months. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an internet-based randomisation procedure with a computer-generated block randomisation with stratification across study sites to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a step-down regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). The assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) criteria) 1 year after randomisation (non-inferiority hypothesis; margin of 30%). Analysis was intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01959451, and EudraCT, 2013-001636-22. FINDINGS: Between Dec 2, 2013, and May 20, 2016, 2610 patients were assigned to study groups; 1304 to the guided de-escalation group and 1306 to the control group. The primary endpoint occurred in 95 patients (7%) in the guided de-escalation group and in 118 patients (9%) in the control group (pnon-inferiority=0·0004; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81 [95% CI 0·62-1·06], psuperiority=0·12). Despite early de-escalation, there was no increase in the combined risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in the de-escalation group (32 patients [3%]) versus in the control group (42 patients [3%]; pnon-inferiority=0·0115). There were 64 BARC 2 or higher bleeding events (5%) in the de-escalation group versus 79 events (6%) in the control group (HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·59-1·13]; p=0·23). INTERPRETATION: Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment was non-inferior to standard treatment with prasugrel at 1 year after PCI in terms of net clinical benefit. Our trial shows that early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment can be considered as an alternative approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with PCI. FUNDING: Klinikum der Universität München, Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Clopidogrel , Esquema de Medicação , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors for long-term outcome in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: There is no data on predictors of long-term outcome in high-risk real-world patients. METHODS: From August 2009 to April 2011, 126 high-risk patients deemed inoperable were treated with TMVR in two high-volume university centers. RESULTS: MR could be successfully reduced to grade ≤2 in 92.1% of patients (116/126 patients). Long-term clinical follow-up up to 5 years (95.2% follow-up rate) revealed a mortality rate of 35.7% (45/126 patients). Repeat mitral valve treatment (surgery or intervention) was needed in 19 patients (15.1%). Long-term clinical improvement was demonstrated with 69% of patients being in NYHA class ≤II. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the post-procedural grade of MR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55 per grade, P = 0.035), the left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.58 for difference between 75th and 25th percentile, P = 0.031) and the glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.33 for 75th vs 25th percentile, P < 0.001) were independent predictors for long-term mortality. Patients with primary MR and a post-procedural MR grade ≤1 had the most favorable long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study determines predictors of long-term clinical outcome after TMVR and demonstrates that the grade of residual MR determines long-term survival. Our data suggest that it might be of benefit reducing residual MR to the lowest possible MR grade using TMVR-especially in selected high-risk patients with primary MR who are not considered as candidates for surgical MVR.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/mortalidade , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular EsquerdaRESUMO
While promising data with the novel bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) are accumulating, signals of scaffold thrombosis (ST) were noted in recent reports. We aimed to assess the relationship between the total surface area (TSA) of implanted everolimus-eluting BVSs and the on-treatment adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 202 consecutive patients undergoing BVS implantation and platelet function testing were included. For investigating the impact of the scaffold surface on platelet reactivity, patients were stratified into two groups regarding the median BVS TSA. The on-treatment ADP-induced platelet reactivity was determined with the Multiplate analyzer and 30-day follow-up was available in 98% of patients. ADP-induced platelet aggregation values (median, [IQR]) did not differ between the two study groups (12.0 [9.0-19.0] U for patients with TSA > 1.39 cm(2) and 13.0 [9.0-19.5] U for patients with TSA ≤ 1.39 cm(2); p = 0.69). No correlation was observed between the BVS TSA and levels of platelet reactivity (Spearman rank correlation = -0.10, p = 0.16). At 30 days after PCI, two early STs (1%) were documented. Thus, in patients on a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen following BVS implantation, the extent of blood-to-BVS contact surface does not negatively affect levels of on-treatment platelet reactivity.
Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Ativação Plaquetária , Alicerces Teciduais , Idoso , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Ativação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel are at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the ISAR-ADAPT-PF study was to assess the antiplatelet efficacy of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel. In a prospective and randomized clinical study, 70 patients with HTPR on clopidogrel loading dose (LD) within 24 h post PCI were assigned to receive either ticagrelor [180 mg LD followed by 90 mg maintenance dose (MD) twice daily] or prasugrel (60 mg LD followed by 10 mg MD once daily). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation assessed on the Multiplate analyzer on day 2 after randomization (primary end point) was as follows: the mean difference between the two treatment groups was 6 aggregation units (AU) × min with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of 41 AU × min, which was greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of 18 AU × min (P for noninferiority = 0.29). However, no significant differences in absolute platelet reactivity levels between ticagrelor- versus prasugrel-treated patients at that time point were observed (138 ± 100 AU × min vs. 132 ± 64 AU × min, P for superiority = 0.77). In conclusion, neither drug was statistically more effective for inhibition of platelet aggregation in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel post PCI, although the study could not formally demonstrate the assumed noninferiority of ticagrelor versus prasugrel.
Assuntos
Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Ativação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Difosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Idoso , Clopidogrel , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Risco , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is a growing medical challenge in today's aging population, leading to increased health expenditure due to the resultant morbidity and mortality. Surgery, either replacement or repair, has been the mainstay of therapy for primary MR. In high-risk or inoperable patients, treatment was limited to medical therapy until 2008. Since then, alternative percutaneous therapies have been introduced and have proven to be safe and effective in patients with secondary MR. Edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip system is applied worldwide for primary and secondary MR. Randomized data do not support its application in low-risk patients with primary MR. Results from ongoing and future randomized trials will clarify its impact on important clinical endpoints in high-risk and inoperable patients. The Carillon device is a percutaneous indirect annuloplasty technique introduced in 2009 for secondary MR. Clinical data for the novel Cardioband system, using a different intra-atrial annuloplasty technique, have been gathered from more than 40 patients and the system recently received CE mark approval. Other percutaneous repair devices and implantable valves are under development and may be introduced into clinical practice soon. The percutaneous interventional therapy of MR is a highly dynamic field of cardiovascular medicine and has the potential to improve quality of life as well as morbidity and mortality in selected patients.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/tendências , Anuloplastia da Valva Mitral/tendências , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term outcome and parameters associated with poor and favorable outcome in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) ≤25% and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (pMVR). BACKGROUND: There is no data on long-term outcome in this cohort of patients. METHODS: We analyzed all 34 patients with a LV-EF ≤25% and severe MR treated with pMVR in 2 university hospitals from 2009 to 2012. RESULTS: Mitral regurgitation could be successfully reduced to grade ≤2 in 30 patients (88%). Long-term follow-up (up to 5 years) revealed a steep decline of the survival curve reaching 50% already 8 month after pMVR. In contrast, estimated survival of the remaining patients showed a favorable long-term outcome. Patients deceased during the first year presented with higher right ventricular tricuspid pressure gradient (RVTG) (44.5 ± 8.4 mmHg vs. 35.2 ± 15.4 mmHg, P = 0.035) and worse RV-function (P = 0.014) prior to the procedure. One-year mortality of patients with pulmonary hypertension and depressed RV-function (n = 22) was very high (77%) compared to the remaining patients (n = 12, mortality rate of 0%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although pMVR lead to a successful reduction of MR in patients with a LV-EF ≤25%, 1-year mortality in this cohort was very high. However, a subgroup of patients showed a favorable long-term outcome after pMVR. Especially the right ventricular parameters sustained RV-function and absence of pulmonary hypertension-easily assessed with echocardiography-might be used to identify this subgroup and encourage pMVR in these patients.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Disfunção Ventricular/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/complicações , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular/complicações , Disfunção Ventricular/mortalidadeRESUMO
Insufficient P2Y12 receptor inhibition is associated with a higher risk of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The third generation thienopyridine prasugrel achieves stronger platelet inhibition as compared to its predecessor clopidogrel. Little is known about predictors of prasugrel drug responsiveness. The aim of this study was to explore predictors of prasugrel responsiveness in patients with a recent PCI on prasugrel maintenance dose (MD) treatment. In a registry of PCI-treated patients (n = 163, recruited between August 2009 and March 2012) on prasugrel MD treatment, the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (PA) was assessed on a Multiplate analyzer. The mean (interquartile range (IQR)) ADP-induced PA on prasugrel MD treatment was 206 (138-331) AU × min. Obese (defined by a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30) patients (n = 42) (303 [192-467] vs. 187 [117-305] AU × min, p = 0.0001), patients (n = 70) with a history of clopidogrel low responsiveness (278 [161-409] vs. 192 [126-282] AU × min, p = 0.002) and patients (n = 18) on a low (5 mg) prasugrel MD (483 [252-798] vs. 198 [133-313] AU × min; p = 0.0001) showed higher PA values on prasugrel MD as compared to the remaining patients. In a multivariable linear regression model, the latter three variables were independently associated with higher PA values on prasugrel MD treatment. In summary response variability is observed in patients on prasugrel MD treatment. Obesity, a history of clopidogrel low responsiveness and a reduced prasugrel MD of 5 mg are independent predictors of an attenuated response to prasugrel treatment. Further studies are needed to explore clinical implications of this observation.
Assuntos
Trombose Coronária/etiologia , Trombose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Trombose Coronária/sangue , Trombose Coronária/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Cloridrato de Prasugrel , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Sistema de Registros , Tiofenos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Aneurisma Coronário/diagnóstico por imagem , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Dispneia/etiologia , Idoso , Aneurisma Coronário/complicações , Aneurisma Coronário/patologia , Aneurisma Coronário/cirurgia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Dispneia/diagnóstico , Fístula/complicações , Átrios do Coração/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Veia Safena/patologia , Veia Safena/transplante , Trombose/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the outcome of percutaneous edge-to-edge repair in patients with degenerative versus functional mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: The optimal patient population eligible for percutaneous edge-to-edge repair has yet to be defined. METHODS: We analyzed 119 patients treated by percutaneous edge-to-edge repair for symptomatic MR, 72 patients with degenerative and 47 patients with functional MR. The primary endpoints were defined as procedural success (MR grade reduction ≥1 grade) as well as a composite endpoint defined as freedom from MR 3+ or 4+, mitral valve reintervention and death 12 months after clip implantation. In patients with successful clip placement we further analyzed MR grade, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, distance in the 6 min walking test and left ventricular volumes 12 months after clip implantation. RESULTS: The primary success rate of all intended clipping procedures was 83.3% for degenerative and 89.4% for functional MR (P = 0.42). Regarding the composite endpoint we observed an event free survival of 59.7% in patients treated for degenerative MR and 63.8% in patients treated for functional MR (P = 0.73). We observed a highly significant reduction in MR grade as well as improvement in NYHA functional status in both groups 12 months after clip implantation. However, there was a more pronounced MR grade reduction in patients treated for degenerative MR compared with patients treated for functional MR. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve is feasible and comparably effective in patients with degenerative and functional MR.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valved allografts (homografts) have been used alternatively to mechanical or biological valve prostheses in expectation of better durability; however, homograft valves do degenerate, and redo procedures have proven challenging due to heavy wall calcification. The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of open surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in degenerated homografts. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2022, 81 patients underwent repeat aortic valve procedures having previously received an aortic homograft. The redo had become necessary due to regurgitation in 85% and stenosis in 15%. Sixty-five percent underwent open surgery, 35% TAVR. RESULTS: Isolated SAVR was possible in 79%, and root procedures were necessary in 21%. TAVR was performed in 79% via transfemoral and 21% via transapical access. Median prosthetic valve size was 23 (22.3-23.2) mm in the SAVR and 26 (25.2-26.9) in the TAVR group. Thirty-day mortality was 0% in the TAVR and 7% in the SAVR group (P = n.s.). TAVR showed a significantly better outcome concerning prolonged ventilation (0 vs 21%, P = 0.013) as well as ICU (1 vs 2 days; P < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (10.5 vs 13 days; P = 0.028). Five-year survival was statistically comparable between groups, and no severe leakage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR following structural homograft degeneration shows acceptable results, but the perioperative risk remains substantial and poorly predictable. TAVR presents a reasonable and more easily accessible alternative and is associated with good short- and mid-term results. In the absence of relevant contraindications, TAVR is presently the preferred treatment option for these patients at our center.