Assessment of Scapholunate Instability on 4D CT Scans in Patients with Inconclusive Conventional Images.

Background Initial imaging work-up using radiography and CT arthrography sometimes can be insufficient to identify a scapholunate (SL) instability (SLI) in patients suspected of having SL ligament tears. Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of four-dimensional (4D) CT in the identification of SLI and apply the findings to patients suspected of having SLI and with inconclusive findings on radiographs and CT arthrograms. Materials and Methods This prospective single-center study enrolled participants suspected of having SLI (recent trauma, dorsal pain, positive Watson test results, decreased grip strength) between March 2015 and March 2020. Participants with wrist fractures, substantial joint stiffness, or history of wrist surgery were excluded. Each participant underwent radiography, CT arthrography, and 4D CT on the same day. Participants were divided into three groups: those with no SLI, those with SLI, and those with inconclusive results. SL gap and radioscaphoid and lunocapitate angle were measured using semiautomatic quantitative analysis of 4D CT images by two independent readers. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 4D CT. Thresholds were determined with the Youden index and were applied to the inconclusive group. Results Of the 150 included participants (mean age, 41 years ± 14 [SD]; 102 male, 48 female), there were 63 with no SLI, 48 with SLI, and 39 with inconclusive results. The maximum value and range of SL gap measurements on 4D CT scans showed high sensitivity (83% [40 of 48] and 90% [43 of 48], respectively) and high specificity (95% [59 of 62] and 81% [50 of 62], respectively) in the identification of SLI. At least one of these parameters was abnormal on 4D CT scans in 17 of 39 (44%) participants in the inconclusive group, and 10 of 17 (59%) participants had confirmed SLI. In the 22 participants in the inconclusive group with no indication of SLI at 4D CT, follow-up showed no evidence of SLI in 10 (45%) and enabled confirmation of SLI via arthroscopy in three (14%). Conclusion Scapholunate gap measurements on kinematic 4D CT scans enabled correct identification of SLI in 59% of participants with inconclusive results on conventional images. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02401568 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Demehri and Ibad in this issue.

Correlation Between Dynamic 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography Data and Arthroscopic Testing of Scapholunate Instability: A Preliminary Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the assessments of scapholunate (SL) instability status on 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) using wrist arthroscopy as a reference standard. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (16 men, 17 women; mean age, 48 ± 13 years) with suspected SL instability were evaluated prospectively with 4D-CT and wrist arthroscopy. Based on the arthroscopic testing of SL joint, 2 groups were defined: group 1 (n = 8) consisted of patients who had no, or slight, SL malalignment in the midcarpal space and group 2 (n = 25) consisted of patients who had moderate or severe SL malalignment. Two independent readers, who did not know the arthroscopic findings, used 4D-CT to evaluate the SL gap, lunocapitate angle (LCA), and radioscaphoid angle (mean and range values) during radioulnar deviation. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability was deemed good or excellent for most of the 4D-CT variables, except for the LCA range (moderate) and SL gap range (poor). For both readers, the SL gap mean, maximum, and minimum values were significantly higher (+67%, +78%, and +39%, respectively) and the LCA mean was significantly lower (-17%) in group 2 than in group 1. The radioscaphoid angle range values were lower (-34%) and the radioscaphoid angle mean values slightly higher (+4%) in group 2, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The SL gap range values were also higher (+86% for R1 and +40% for R2) and the LCA range values also lower (-50% for R1 and -31% for R2) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative 4D-CT data corresponded well with the arthroscopic dynamic analysis of the SL joint in patients with suspected chronic SL instability. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Kinematic 4D CT case-control study of wrist in dart throwing motion "in vivo": comparison with other maneuvers.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of scapholunate gap (SLG) measurements acquired with dart throwing (DT), radio-ulnar deviation (RUD), and clenching fist (CF) maneuvers on 4D CT for the identification of scapholunate instability. METHODS: In this prospective study, 47 patients with suspected scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) tears were evaluated from March 2015 to March 2020 with semiautomatic quantitative analysis on 4D CT. Five parameters (median, maximal value, range, and coefficient of variation) for SLG, lunocapitate angle (LCA), and radioscaphoid angle (RSA) obtained during DT maneuver were evaluated in patients with and without SLIL tears. CT arthrography was used as the gold standard for the SLIL status. The SLG values obtained were also compared with those obtained during CF and RUD maneuvers. RESULTS: Significant differences in all SLG- and LCA-derived parameters are found between patients with and without SLIL tears with DT (p < 0.003). The best diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of SLIL tears was obtained with median and maximal SLG values (sensitivity and specificity of 86-89% and 95%) and with maximal and range LCA values (sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 74%). No significant differences were observed for RSA values (p > 0.275). The SLG range obtained with DT maneuver was the only dynamic parameter statistically different between patients with partial and complete torn SLIL (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: 4D CT of the wrist during DT showed a similar performance than RUD and a better performance than CF for the differentiation between patients with and without SLIL tears. KEY POINTS: • Four-dimensional computed tomography can dynamically assess scapholunate instability. • The best results for differentiating between patients with and without SLIL tears were obtained with SLG median and maximal values. • The dart throwing and radio-ulnar deviation maneuvers yielded the best results for the dynamic evaluation of scapholunate instability.

An international polypectomy practice survey.

Background and study aims: In recent years, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been recommended as the preferred approach for removal of small and diminutive colorectal polyps. We conducted an international survey among endoscopists to understand the uptake of CSP and changes in polypectomy practice during recent years.Patients and methods: Endoscopists were invited through gastroenterology, colorectal surgery and endoscopy societies to participate in an online survey. The primary outcome was to identify the predominant polypectomy approach used to remove 4‒10 mm colorectal polyps. Secondary outcomes included the uptake of CSP in the past 5 years, current polypectomy practice patterns for 1‒20 mm polyps, practice changes in recent years, and perceived benefits/concerns related to different polypectomy techniques.Results: The survey was distributed internationally by nine societies and completed by 808 endoscopists (response rate 3.7%). CSP was the predominant polypectomy technique for 4‒5 mm polyps (67.0%, 95% CI, 63.7-70.2%) and 6‒10 mm polyps (55.2%, 95% CI, 51.8-58.6%). For 1‒3 mm polyps, cold forceps remained the predominant technique (78.4%, 95% CI, 75.6-81.3%), whereas hot snare polypectomy (HSP) remained the predominant technique for 10‒20 mm polyps (92.5%, 95% CI, 90.7-94.3%). 87.5% (95% CI, 85.2-89.8%) of endoscopists reported an increase in CSP use during the past 5 years.Conclusions: This survey found a substantial increase in CSP use during recent years. CSP has become the predominant polypectomy approach for 4‒10 mm colorectal polyps, while HSP remained the predominant approach for larger (10‒20 mm) polyps. Clinical practice patterns are well aligned with recently issued guideline recommendations.

Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey.

Background and study aims Optical real-time diagnosis (= resect-and-discard strategy) is an alternative to histopathology for diminutive colorectal polyps. However, clinical adoption of this approach seems sparse. We were interested in evaluating potential clinical uptake and barriers for implementation of this approach. Methods We conducted an international survey using the "Google forms" platform. Nine endoscopy societies distributed the survey. Survey questions measured current clinical uptake and barriers for implementing the resect-and-discard strategy , perceived cancer risk associated with diminutive polyps and potential concerns with using CT-colonography as follow-up, as well as non-resection of diminutive polyps. Results Eight hundred and eight endoscopists participated in the survey. 84.2 % (95 % CI 81.6 %-86.7 %) of endoscopists are currently not using the resect-and-discard strategy and 59.9 % (95 % CI 56.5 %-63.2 %) do not believe that the resect-and-discard strategy is feasible for implementation in its current form. European (38.5 %) and Asian (45 %) endoscopists had the highest rates of resect-and-discard practice, while Canadian (13.8 %) and American (5.1 %) endoscopists had some of the lowest implementation rates. 80.3 % (95 % CI 77.5 %-83.0 %) of endoscopists believe that using the resect-and-discard strategy for diminutive polyps will not increase cancer risk. 48.4 % (95 % CI 45.0 %-51.9 %) of endoscopists believe that leaving diminutive polyps in place is associated with increased cancer risk. This proportion was slightly higher (54.7 %; 95 % CI 53.6 %-60.4 %) when asked if current CT-colonography screening practice might increase cancer risks. Conclusion Clinical uptake of resect-and-discard is very low. Most endoscopists believe that resect-and-discard is not feasible for clinical implementation in its current form. The most important barriers for implementation are fear of making an incorrect diagnosis, assigning incorrect surveillance intervals and medico-legal consequences.

Use of the over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with severe cardiovascular comorbidities: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) can potentially overcome limitations of standard clips and achieve more efficient and reliable hemostasis. Data on OTSC use for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities are currently limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed our database from February 2009 to September 2015 from all patients who underwent emergency endoscopy for high-risk NVUGIB in 2 academic centers and were treated with OTSC as first-line (n = 81) or second-line therapy (n = 19). RESULTS: One hundred patients mean age 72 (range 27 - 97 years) were included in this study. Fifty-one percent (n = 51) had severe cardiovascular co-morbidity (ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, valvular heart disease, peripheral arterial occlusive disease and atrial fibrillation) and 73 % (n = 73) were on antiplatelet or/and anticoagulation therapy. The median size of the treated ulcers was 3 cm (range 1 - 5 cm). In 94 % (n = 94) primary hemostasis with OTSC was achieved. Clinical long-term success during a mean 6-month follow-up without rebleeding was 86 % (n = 86). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort OTSC was demonstrated to be a safe and effective first- or second-line treatment for NVUGIB in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease and complex, large ulcers.