Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 119(23): 5367-73, 2012 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22422824

RESUMO

The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine. We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(12): 2101-7, 2010 Apr 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20308656

RESUMO

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate frequency and prognostic significance of high EVI1 expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS A diagnostic assay detecting multiple EVI1 splice variants was developed to determine the relative EVI1 expression by single real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 1,382 newly diagnosed adult patients with AML younger than 60 years. Patients were treated on four Dutch-Belgian HOVON (n = 458) and two German-Austrian AML Study Group protocols (n = 924). Results The EVI1 assay was tested in the HOVON cohort and validated in the AMLSG cohort. High EVI1 levels (EVI1(+)) were found with similar frequencies in both cohorts combined, with a 10.7% incidence (148 of 1,382). EVI1(+) independently predicted low complete remission (CR) rate (odds ratio, 0.54; P = .002), adverse relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; P = .05), and event-free survival (EFS; HR, 1.46; P < .001). This adverse prognostic impact was more pronounced in the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (EFS; HR, 1.64; P < .001; and RFS; HR, 1.55; P = .02), and was also apparent in cytogenetically normal AML (EFS; HR, 1.67; P = .008). Besides inv(3)/t(3;3), EVI1(+) was significantly associated with chromosome abnormalities monosomy 7 and t(11q23), conferring prognostic impact within these two cytogenetic subsets. EVI1(+) was virtually absent in favorable-risk AML and AML with NPM1 mutations. Patients with EVI1(+) AML (n = 28) who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first CR had significantly better 5-year RFS (33% +/- 10% v 0%). CONCLUSION EVI1 expression in AML is unequally distributed in cytogenetic subtypes. It predicts poor outcome, particularly among intermediate cytogenetic risk AML. Patients with EVI1(+) AML may benefit from allogeneic transplantation in first CR. Pretreatment EVI1 screening should be included in risk stratification.


Assuntos
Cromossomos Humanos Par 11 , Cromossomos Humanos Par 7 , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Monossomia , Proto-Oncogenes/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Translocação Genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Citogenética , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Proteína do Locus do Complexo MDS1 e EVI1 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nucleofosmina , Razão de Chances , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA