Influence of videolaryngoscopy using McGrath Mac on the need for a helper to perform intubation during general anaesthesia: a multicentre randomised video-no-video trial.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that videolaryngoscopy modifies practice of tracheal intubation. DESIGN: Randomised single-blinded study (video and no-video groups). SETTING: Three institutions: one academic, one non-profit and one profit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients >18 years, requiring orotracheal intubation, without predicted difficult intubation. Non-inclusion criterion was patients requiring a rapid-sequence intubation. 300 patients were included, 271 randomised, 256 analysed: 123 in the no-video and 133 in the video groups. INTERVENTION: Tracheal intubation using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope, the sequence being video recorded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of intubations where assistance is necessary on request of the operator. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative variables (intubation difficulty scale and its components, percentage of glottic opening score, oesophageal Intubation, duration of intubation, removal of the screen cover in the no-video group, global evaluation of the ease of intubation, bispectral index, heart rate and blood pressure), intraoperative and postoperative complications (hoarseness or sore throat) and cooperation of the anaesthesiology team. RESULTS: Requirement for assistance was not decreased in the Video group: 36.1% (95% CI 27.9 to 44.9) vs 45.5% (95% CI 36.5 to 54.7) in the no-video group, p=0.74; OR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.1) and absolute risk: 0.10 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.22). Intubation difficulty scale was similar in both groups (p=0.05). Percentage of glottic opening score was better in the Video group (median of 100 (95% CI (100 to 100) and 80 (95%CI (80 to 90) in the no-video group; p<0.001) as Cormack and Lehane grade (p=0001). Ease of intubation was considered better in the video group (p<0.001). Other secondary outcomes were similar between groups. Screen cover was removed in 7.3% (95% CI (2.7 to 11.9)) of the cases in the video group. No serious adverse event occurred. Communication and behaviour within the anaesthesia team were appropriate in all cases. CONCLUSION: In patients without predicted difficult intubation, videolaryngoscopy did not decrease the requirement for assistance to perform intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02926144; Results.

Screening for postoperative vital signs abnormalities, and particularly hemodynamic ones, by continuous monitoring: protocol for the Biobeat-Postop cohort study.

Background: Postoperative hypotension associated with postoperative morbidity and early mortality has been studied previously. Hypertension and other hemodynamic, respiratory, and temperature abnormalities have comparatively understudied during the first postoperative days. Methods: This bi-centre observational cohort study will include 114 adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery hospitalized on an unmonitored general care floor and wearing a multi-signal wearable sensor, allowing remote monitoring ( Biobeat Technologies Ltd, Petah Tikva, Israel). The study will cover the first 72 hours after discharge of the patient from the post-anaesthesia care unit. Several thresholds will be used for each variable (arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and skin temperature). Data obtained using the sensor will be compared to data obtained during the routine nurse follow-up. The primary outcome is hemodynamic abnormality. The secondary outcomes are postoperative respiratory and temperature abnormalities, artefacts and blank/null outputs from the wearable device, postoperative complications, and finally, the ease of use of the device. We hypothesize that remote monitoring will detect abnormalities in vital signs more often or more quickly than the detection by nurses' routine surveillance. Discussion: A demonstration of the ability of wireless sensors to outperform standard monitoring techniques paves the way for the creation of a loop which includes this monitoring mode, the automated creation of alerts, and the sending of these alerts to caregivers. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04585178. Registered on October 14, 2020.

Operating room extubation: A predictive factor for 1-year survival after double-lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) extubation has been reported after lung transplantation (LT) in small cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of OR-extubated patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety of this approach and to identify its predictive factors. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients undergoing double lung transplantation (DLT) from January 2012 to June 2019. Patients undergoing multiorgan transplantation, repeat transplantation, or cardiopulmonary bypass during the study period were excluded. OR-extubated patients were compared with intensive care unit (ICU)-extubated patients. RESULTS: Among the 450 patients included in the analysis, 161 (35.8%) were extubated in the OR, and 4 were reintubated within 24 hours. Predictive factors for OR extubation were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/emphysema (p = .002) and cystic fibrosis (p = .005), recipient body mass index (p = .048), and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio 10 minutes after second graft implantation (p < .001). OR-extubated patients had a lower prevalence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at day 3 (p < .001). Eight (5.0%) patients died within the first year after OR extubation, and 49 (13.5%) patients died after ICU extubation (log-rank test; p = .005). After adjustment for OR extubation predictive factors, the multivariate Cox regression model showed that OR extubation was associated with greater one-year survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.40 [0.16-0.91], p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: OR extubation was associated with a favorable prognosis after DLT, but the association should not be interpreted as causality. This fast-track protocol was made possible by a team committed to developing a comprehensive strategy to enhance recovery.

HELP-VDL: study protocol for a multicentre, open, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of the head-elevated laryngoscopy position and the use of a videolaryngoscope to facilitate orotracheal intubation in a patient population without predictable difficulty of intubation.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheal intubation remains an everyday challenge for anaesthesiologists, even in patients without suspected difficult airways. The ideal positioning of the patient's head (flat, raised a few centimetres on a cushion in the sniffing position (SP), or raised to achieve horizontal alignment between the external acoustic meatus and the sternal angle) and the use of videolaryngoscopy remain controversial. This trial aims to compare the efficacy for orotracheal intubation of the SP or the head-elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP), which has been shown to improve laryngeal visualization and the intubation condition particularly in obese patients, in combination with a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope whose video screen is either on or off (Video or NoVideo). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HELP-VDL factorial trial is a prospective, randomised, parallel, multicentre, open study of 240 adult patients undergoing tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia. Patients will be allocated into four groups: SP-NoVideo, HELP-NoVideo, SP-Video and HELP-Video. The primary outcome is the proportion of orotracheal intubations that requires the assistance of a nurse anaesthetist. The secondary outcomes include the intubation duration, the first intubation success rate, the quality of visualisation of the glottis, the glottis visualisation score, adjunctive manoeuvres and alternative techniques used, the occurrence of oesophageal intubation, failure of tracheal intubation, the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation, the perception of a difficult intubation, the score on the Intubation Difficulty Scale, cooperation among the members of the anaesthesia team, the evolution of vital signs and the frequency and severity of intubation complications. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle and a per-protocol basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee Ile de France V (Paris, France). Participant recruitment began on 3 July 2019. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03987009; Pre-results.