Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiac Arrest: Does Age Matter?

OBJECTIVES: The impact of age on hospital survival for patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for cardiac arrest (CA) is unknown. We sought to characterize the association between older age and hospital survival after ECPR, using a large international database. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years old or older who underwent ECPR for CA between December 1, 2016, and October 31, 2020. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of death after ECPR, analyzed by age group (18-49, 50-64, 65-74, and > 75 yr). A total of 5,120 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range, 46-66 yr). There was a significantly lower aOR of survival for those 65-74 (0.68l 95% CI, 0.57-0.81) or those greater than 75 (0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.69), compared with 18-49. Patients 50-64 had a significantly higher aOR of survival compared with those 65-74 and greater than 75; however, there was no difference in survival between the two youngest groups (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05). A sensitivity analysis using alternative age categories (18-64, 65-69, 70-74, and ≥ 75) demonstrated decreased odds of survival for age greater than or equal to 65 compared with patients younger than 65 (for age 65-69: odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.86; for age 70-74: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04; and for age ≥ 75: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation represents the largest analysis of the relationship of older age on ECPR outcomes. We found that the odds of hospital survival for patients with CA treated with ECPR diminishes with increasing age, with significantly decreased odds of survival after age 65, despite controlling for illness severity and comorbidities. However, findings from this observational data have significant limitations and further studies are needed to evaluate these findings prospectively.

One-Year Functional Outcomes After Invasive Mechanical Ventilation for Older Adults With Preexisting Long-Term Care-Needs.

OBJECTIVES: To examine 1-year functional outcomes after invasive mechanical ventilation for adults greater than or equal to 65 years with preexisting long-term care-needs. DESIGN: We used medical and long-term care administrative databases. The database included data on functional and cognitive impairments that were assessed with the national standardized care-needs certification system and were categorized into seven care-needs levels based on the total daily estimated care minutes. Primary outcome was mortality and care-needs at 1 year after invasive mechanical ventilation. Outcome was stratified by preexisting care-needs at the time of invasive mechanical ventilation: no care-needs, support level 1-2 and care-needs level 1 (estimated care time 25-49 min), care-needs level 2-3 (50-89 min), and care-needs level 4-5 (≥90 min). SETTING: A population-based cohort study in Tochigi Prefecture, one of 47 prefectures in Japan. PATIENTS: Among people greater than or equal to 65 years old registered between June 2014 and February 2018, patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation were identified. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 593,990 eligible people, 4,198 (0.7%) received invasive mechanical ventilation. The mean age was 81.2 years, and 55.5% were male. The 1-year mortality rates after invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with no care-needs, support level 1-2 and care-needs level 1, care-needs level 2-3, and care-needs level 4-5 at the time of invasive mechanical ventilation were 43.4%, 54.9%, 67.8%, and 74.1%, respectively. Similarly, those with worsened care-needs were 22.8%, 24.2%, 11.4%, and 1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in preexisting care-needs levels 2-5 who received invasive mechanical ventilation, 76.0-79.2% died or had worsened care-needs within 1 year. These findings may aid shared decision-making among patients, their families, and heath care professionals on the appropriateness of starting invasive mechanical ventilation for people with poor functional and cognitive status at baseline.

An emergency department nurse led intervention to facilitate serious illness conversations among seriously ill older adults: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Serious illness conversations may lead to care consistent with patients' goals near the end of life. The emergency department could serve as an important time and location for these conversations. AIM: To determine the feasibility of an emergency department-based, brief motivational interview to stimulate serious illness conversations among seriously ill older adults by trained nurses. DESIGN: A pre-/post-intervention study. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: In an urban, tertiary care, academic medical center and a community hospital from January 2021 to January 2022, we prospectively enrolled adults ⩾50 years of age with serious illness and an expected prognosis <1 year. We measured feasibility outcomes using the standardized framework for feasibility studies. In addition, we also collected the validated 4-item Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (a 5-point Likert scale) at baseline and 4-week follow-up and reviewing the electronic medical record for documentation related to newly completed serious illness conversations. RESULTS: Among 116 eligible patients who were willing and able to participate, 76 enrolled (65% recruitment rate), and 68 completed the follow-up (91% retention rate). Mean patient age was 64.4 years (SD 8.4), 49% were female, and 58% had metastatic cancer. In all, 16 nurses conducted the intervention, and all participants completed the intervention with a median duration of 27 min. Self-reported Advance Care Planning Engagement increased from 2.78 pre to 3.31 post intervention (readiness to "talk to doctors about end-of-life wishes," p < 0.008). Documentation of health care proxy forms increased (62-70%) as did Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (1-11%) during the 6 months after the emergency department visit. CONCLUSION: A novel, emergency department-based, nurse-led brief motivational interview to stimulate serious illness conversations is feasible and may improve advance care planning engagement and documentation in seriously ill older adults.

Palliative care in the emergency department: A qualitative study exploring barriers, facilitators, desired clinician qualities, and future directions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceived qualities of successful palliative care (PC) providers in the emergency department (ED), barriers and facilitators to ED-PC, and clinicians' perspectives on the future of ED-PC. METHOD: This qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in June-August 2020. Interviews were analyzed via a two-phase Rapid Analysis. The study's primary outcomes (innovations in ED-PC during COVID) are published elsewhere. In this secondary analysis, we examine interviewee responses to broader questions about ED-PC currently and in the future. RESULTS: PC providers perceived as successful in their work in the ED were described as autonomous, competent, flexible, fast, and fluent in ED language and culture. Barriers to ED-PC integration included the ED environment, lack of access to PC providers at all times, the ED perception of PC, and the lack of a supporting financial model. Facilitators to ED-PC integration included proactive identification of patients who would benefit from PC, ED-focused PC education and tools, PC presence in the ED, and data supporting ED-PC. Increased primary PC education for ED staff, increased automation, and innovative ED-PC models were seen as areas for future growth. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our findings provide useful information for PC programs considering expanding their ED presence, particularly as this is the first study to our knowledge that examines traits of successful PC providers in the ED environment. Our findings also suggest that, despite growth in the arena of ED-PC, barriers and facilitators remain similar to those identified previously. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact that ED-PC initiatives may have on patient and system outcomes, to identify a financial model to maintain ED-PC integration, and to examine whether perceptions of successful providers align with objective measures of the same.

Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Substitutive hospital-level care in a patient's home may reduce cost, health care use, and readmissions while improving patient experience, although evidence from randomized controlled trials in the United States is lacking. Objective: To compare outcomes of home hospital versus usual hospital care for patients requiring admission. Design: Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03203759). Setting: Academic medical center and community hospital. Patients: 91 adults (43 home and 48 control) admitted via the emergency department with selected acute conditions. Intervention: Acute care at home, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. Measurements: The primary outcome was the total direct cost of the acute care episode (sum of costs for nonphysician labor, supplies, medications, and diagnostic tests). Secondary outcomes included health care use and physical activity during the acute care episode and at 30 days. Results: The adjusted mean cost of the acute care episode was 38% (95% CI, 24% to 49%) lower for home patients than control patients. Compared with usual care patients, home patients had fewer laboratory orders (median per admission, 3 vs. 15), imaging studies (median, 14% vs. 44%), and consultations (median, 2% vs. 31%). Home patients spent a smaller proportion of the day sedentary (median, 12% vs. 23%) or lying down (median, 18% vs. 55%) and were readmitted less frequently within 30 days (7% vs. 23%). Limitation: The study involved 2 sites, a small number of home physicians, and a small sample of highly selected patients (with a 63% refusal rate among potentially eligible patients); these factors may limit generalizability. Conclusion: Substitutive home hospitalization reduced cost, health care use, and readmissions while increasing physical activity compared with usual hospital care. Primary Funding Source: Partners HealthCare Center for Population Health and internal departmental funds.

Goals-of-Care Conversations for Older Adults With Serious Illness in the Emergency Department: Challenges and Opportunities.

During the last 6 months of life, 75% of older adults with preexisting serious illness, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease, and cancer, visit the emergency department (ED). ED visits often mark an inflection point in these patients' illness trajectories, signaling a more rapid rate of decline. Although most patients are there seeking care for acute issues, many of them have priorities other than to simply live as long as possible; yet without discussion of preferences for treatment, they are at risk of receiving care not aligned with their goals. An ED visit may offer a unique "teachable moment" to empower patients to consider their ability to influence future medical care decisions. However, the constraints of the ED setting pose specific challenges, and little research exists to guide clinicians treating patients in this setting. We describe the current state of goals-of-care conversations in the ED, outline the challenges to conducting these conversations, and recommend a research agenda to better equip emergency physicians to guide shared decisionmaking for end-of-life care. Applying best practices for serious illness communication may help emergency physicians empower such patients to align their future medical care with their values and goals.

Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals are standard of care for acute illness, but hospitals can be unsafe, uncomfortable, and expensive. Providing substitutive hospital-level care in a patient's home potentially reduces cost while maintaining or improving quality, safety, and patient experience, although evidence from randomized controlled trials in the US is lacking. OBJECTIVE: Determine if home hospital care reduces cost while maintaining quality, safety, and patient experience. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted via the emergency department with any infection or exacerbation of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma. INTERVENTION: Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, continuous monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was direct cost of the acute care episode. Secondary outcomes included utilization, 30-day cost, physical activity, and patient experience. KEY RESULTS: Nine patients were randomized to home, 11 to usual care. Median direct cost of the acute care episode for home patients was 52% (IQR, 28%; p = 0.05) lower than for control patients. During the care episode, home patients had fewer laboratory orders (median per admission: 6 vs. 19; p < 0.01) and less often received consultations (0% vs. 27%; p = 0.04). Home patients were more physically active (median minutes, 209 vs. 78; p < 0.01), with a trend toward more sleep. No adverse events occurred in home patients, one occurred in control patients. Median direct cost for the acute care plus 30-day post-discharge period for home patients was 67% (IQR, 77%; p < 0.01) lower, with trends toward less use of home-care services (22% vs. 55%; p = 0.08) and fewer readmissions (11% vs. 36%; p = 0.32). Patient experience was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of substitutive home-hospitalization compared to in-hospital usual care reduced cost and utilization and improved physical activity. No significant differences in quality, safety, and patient experience were noted, with more definitive results awaiting a larger trial. Trial Registration NCT02864420.

Common mistakes and evidence-based approaches in goals-of-care conversations for seriously ill older adults in cardiac care unit.

For older adults with serious, life-limiting illnesses near the end of life, clinicians frequently face difficult decisions about the medical care they provide because of clinical uncertainty. This difficulty is further complicated by unique challenges and medical advancements for patients with advanced heart diseases. In this article, we describe common mistakes encountered by clinicians when having goals-of-care conversations (e.g. conversations between clinicians and seriously ill patients/surrogates to discuss patient's values and goals for clinical care near the end of life.). Then, we delineate an evidence-based approach in goals-of-care conversations and highlight the unique challenges around decision-making in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Palliative care screening tools in Japan: cross-sectional utility study.

OBJECTIVES: In Japan's ageing society, the utility of US-based and UK-based palliative care screening tools in the inpatient setting is unknown. The purpose of this study is to identify the unmet palliative care needs of patients who are admitted to an acute care hospital using the US-based and UK-based screening tools. METHODS: This single-centre, cross-sectional study included patients who were admitted to an acute care hospital in Tokyo, Japan, from November 2019 to January 2020. We used the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool and Palliative Care Screening Tool in the Emergency Department among admitted patients. RESULTS: 126 patients (51.6%) were screened positive in total. Among these patients, the main comorbid conditions were dementia/frailty (85.7%) and neurological disease (50.8%). CONCLUSIONS: One out of every two internal medicine inpatients at acute care hospitals may have palliative care needs. Given the lack of adequate palliative care workforce in Japan, a modified screening tool to capture the most high-risk patients may be necessary.

Preparing Preclinical Medical Students for Routine Code Status Discussions: A Mixed-Methods Study.

CONTEXT: Medical students are expected to gain competency in inquiring about patients' goals of care, per the Association of American Medical Colleges' Entrustable Professional Activities. While students may be part of teams that conduct routine code status discussions (CSDs), formal training in this skill prior to clinical clerkships is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to address this training gap by designing a curriculum to teach preclinical medical students about routine CSDs. METHODS: We designed and conducted an interactive workshop for preclinical medical students to learn about routine CSDs and practice this skill, using Kern's Six Steps to Curriculum Design. A qualitative and quantitative pre- and postsurvey was administered. A convergent, parallel, mixed methods analysis was performed. RESULTS: Students (n = 135) named more options for code status following the workshop (presurvey 1.3 vs. postsurvey 4.3, P < 0.01). There was an increase in the proportion of students reporting that they felt "somewhat comfortable" or "extremely comfortable" conducting a CSD (presurvey 19% vs. postsurvey 64%, P < 0.01), and a decrease in those reporting that they felt "extremely uncomfortable" or "somewhat uncomfortable" (presurvey 53% vs. postsurvey 18%, P < 0.01). Thematic analysis revealed that students were concerned about knowledge gaps, communication tools, personal discomfort, and upsetting patients or family. CONCLUSION: A workshop to train medical students to conduct routine CSDs can be included as part of a preclinical medical education curriculum. Students reported that the workshop increased their confidence in conducting CSDs and demonstrated an increase in corresponding knowledge, preparing them to deliver person-centered care on their clerkships.

Enduring Positive Impact of a Virtual Communication Skills Workshop of VitalTalk Pedagogy in a Non-U.S. Setting.

CONTEXT: While in-person workshops on serious illness communication skills using VitalTalk pedagogy have been shown to have a long-lasting impact, whether changing the format into virtual would maintain its enduring impact is unknown. Objectives. To examine long-term impacts of a virtual VitalTalk communication workshop. METHODS: Physicians in Japan who participated in our virtual VitalTalk workshop were asked to complete a self-assessment survey at 3 time points: before, immediately after, and 2 months after the workshop. We examined self-reported preparedness in 11 communication skills on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 time points, as well as self-reported frequency of practice on 5 communication skills at the pre- and 2-month time points. RESULTS: Between January 2021 and June 2022, 117 physicians from 73 institutions across Japan completed our workshop. Seventy-four participants returned the survey at all the 3 time points. Their skill preparedness significantly improved upon the completion of the workshop in all 11 skills (P < .001 for all items). The improvement remained at the same level at 2 months in 7 skills. In 4 of the 11 skills, there was further improvement at the 2-month point. The frequency of self-directed skill practice also increased significantly in the 2-month survey for all 5 skills. CONCLUSION: A virtual workshop of VitalTalk pedagogy improved self-reported preparedness of communication skills, and the impact was long-lasting in a non-U.S. setting as it likely induced self-practice of skills. Our findings encourage the use of a virtual format in any geographical location considering its enduring impact and easy accessibility.

Emergency Palliative Care: Nongoal Concordant Care and Time-Limited Trials in the Emergency Department.

When advance care plans are not communicated or goals are in conflict, significant family and clinician distress may result. The distress is especially high when potentially nongoal concordant care is expected by surrogates in the emergency department (ED). To demonstrate the effect of off-hour, phone consultations by palliative care clinicians in reducing the family and clinician distress when nongoal concordant care is expected in the ED. A partnership between palliative care and emergency medicine can decrease the burden of decision making and provide opportunities for modeling a goals-of-care discussion by experts in this important procedure.