Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 191(10): 1158-65, 2015 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25756857

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Chest computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for demonstrating cystic fibrosis (CF) airway disease. However, there are no standardized outcome measures appropriate for children younger than 6 years. OBJECTIVES: We developed the Perth-Rotterdam Annotated Grid Morphometric Analysis for CF (PRAGMA-CF), a quantitative measure of airway disease, and compared it with the commonly used CF-CT scoring method. METHODS: CT scans from the Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for CF (AREST CF) cohort in Western Australia were included. PRAGMA-CF was performed by annotating a grid overlaid on 10 axial slices for the presence of bronchiectasis, mucous plugging, or other airway abnormalities (inspiratory scans) and trapped air (expiratory scans). The separate proportions of total disease (%Dis), bronchiectasis (%Bx), and trapped air (%TA) were determined. Thirty scans were used for observer reliability, and 30 paired scans obtained at 1 and 3 years old were used for comparison with a validated standard and biologic plausibility. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraobserver, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval) for %Dis, %Bx, and %TA were 0.93 (0.86-0.97), 0.93 (0.85-0.96), and 0.96 (0.91-0.98), respectively. The change in %Dis (P = 0.004) and %Bx (P = 0.001) with PRAGMA-CF was related to neutrophil elastase presence at age 3, whereas only the change in bronchiectasis score was related to neutrophil elastase (P < 0.001) with CF-CT. Sample-size calculations for various effect sizes are presented. CONCLUSIONS: PRAGMA-CF is a sensitive and reproducible outcome measure for assessing the extent of lung disease in very young children with CF.


Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Bronquiectasia/patologia , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatologia , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Fibrose Cística/patologia , Fibrose Cística/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Pulmão/patologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Austrália Ocidental
3.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(5): 1161-1168, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32119198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chest computed tomography (CT) in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is sensitive in detecting early airways disease. The pressure-controlled CT-protocol combines a total lung capacity scan (TLC PC-CT) with a near functional residual capacity scan (FRC PC-CT) under general anesthesia, while another CT-protocol is acquired during free breathing (FB-CT) near functional residual capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity in detecting airways disease of both protocols in two cohorts. METHODS: Routine PC-CTs (Princess Margaret Children's Hospital) and FB-CTs (Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital) were retrospectively collected from CF children aged 2 to 6 years. Total airways disease (%disease), bronchiectasis (%Bx), and low attenuation regions (%LAR) were scored on CTs using the Perth-Rotterdam annotated grid morphometric analysis-CF method. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for differences between TLC and FRC PC-CTs and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for differences between FRC PC-CTs and FB-CTs. RESULTS: Fifty patients with PC-CTs (21 male, aged 2.5-5.5 years) and 42 patients with FB-CTs (26 male, aged 2.3-6.8 years) were included. %Disease was higher on TLC PC-CTs compared with FRC PC-CTs (median 4.51 vs 2.49; P < .001). %Disease and %Bx were not significantly different between TLC PC-CTs and FB-CTs (median 4.51% vs 3.75%; P = .143 and 0.52% vs 0.57%; P = .849). %Disease, %Bx, and %LAR were not significantly different between FRC PC-CTs and FB-CTs (median 2.49% vs 3.75%; P = .055, 0.54% vs 0.57%; P = .797, and 2.49% vs 1.53%; P = .448). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that FRC PC-CTs are less sensitive than TLC PC-CTs and that FB-CTs have similar sensitivity to PC-CTs in detecting lung disease. FB-CTs seem to be a viable alternative for PC-CTs to track CF lung disease in young patients with CF.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Fibrose Cística/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Capacidade Residual Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Respiração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Capacidade Pulmonar Total
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA