Application of the Toxic Stress Schema: An Exemplar for School Nurses.

For many children of color, the cumulative impact of pre-existing stressors, disparities, and pandemic-related losses has contributed to a toxic level of stress. Toxic stress can disrupt healthy brain development making children vulnerable to physical and mental health problems. School nurses are the primary health professionals who interact with children daily during the academic year, which positions them to identify risk factors within the social determinants of health that contribute to the development of toxic stress. The Toxic Stress Schema (TSS) provides a framework for assessment and care planning related to social determinants of health and potential sources of stress and/or buffering support for the physical and mental well-being of children. A case study approach is used to demonstrate the application of the TSS to school nursing and provide the basis for conceptualizing a plan of care and identifying resources to support the child's physical and mental health.

A Schema of Toxic Stress Informed by Racism, Transgenerational Stress, and Disadvantage.

INTRODUCTION: The Toxic Stress Schema (TSS) is an ecological framework with a social justice lens for identifying and alleviating stress and strengthening social determinants of health for children and families of color impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the cumulative effects of racism and generational, systemic inequities. METHOD: Relevant literature is reviewed, and examples were provided to illustrate the differential impacts of the "stress superstorm" of 2020 had on children of color based on their family's position on the advantage-disadvantage continuum. RESULTS: The utility of the TSS framework as a model for advanced nursing practice is demonstrated, and recommendations are formulated for the pediatric nurse practitioner's role in health policy. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic elucidated the historical inequities experienced by children and families of color. The TSS framework provides a model for recognizing, organizing, and implementing.

An exploratory study of depression among older African American users of an academic outpatient rehabilitation program.

Variation in the presentation of depressive illness among older African Americans may complicate assessment of depression, especially among those with multiple medical comorbidities and functional disabilities. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of depression among older poor African Americans attending an academic outpatient rehabilitation program, using a depression measure with low somatic item content. Correlates of depression in this population also were explored. Health-care records of 150 older African Americans seen over a 2-year period were examined. Depression was assessed on admission using the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Using a GDS cutoff score for depression of 11 or higher, 30% of the sample (age 75.5 +/- 7.16 years, range 65-95, 75% women) scored positive for depression. Nine percent also reported having suicidal thoughts within the previous week. Consistent with existing literature, depressed patients, as compared to nondepressed patients, were significantly younger, more suicidal, more likely to rate their general health as poor, had higher mean ratings of pain, and more often limited their social activities. Six GDS items were found to have little ability to discriminate between depressed and nondepressed patients: satisfaction with life, getting bored easily, prefer staying at home, find life exciting, getting started on new projects, and full of energy. The authors recommend further testing of the GDS with similar populations of older, poor, medically ill, and functionally disabled older adults.