Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 325(2): 146-155, 2021 01 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433576

RESUMO

Importance: Substantial increases in both neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and maternal opioid use disorder have been observed through 2014. Objective: To examine national and state variation in NAS and maternal opioid-related diagnoses (MOD) rates in 2017 and to describe national and state changes since 2010 in the US, which included expanded MOD codes (opioid use disorder plus long-term and unspecified use) implemented in International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the 2010 to 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample and State Inpatient Databases, an all-payer compendium of hospital discharge records from community nonrehabilitation hospitals in 47 states and the District of Columbia. Exposures: State and year. Main Outcomes and Measures: NAS rate per 1000 birth hospitalizations and MOD rate per 1000 delivery hospitalizations. Results: In 2017, there were 751 037 birth hospitalizations and 748 239 delivery hospitalizations in the national sample; 5375 newborns had NAS and 6065 women had MOD documented in the discharge record. Mean gestational age was 38.4 weeks and mean maternal age was 28.8 years. From 2010 to 2017, the estimated NAS rate significantly increased by 3.3 per 1000 birth hospitalizations (95% CI, 2.5-4.1), from 4.0 (95% CI, 3.3-4.7) to 7.3 (95% CI, 6.8-7.7). The estimated MOD rate significantly increased by 4.6 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations (95% CI, 3.9-5.4), from 3.5 (95% CI, 3.0-4.1) to 8.2 (95% CI, 7.7-8.7). Larger increases for MOD vs NAS rates occurred with new International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes in 2016. From a census of 47 state databases in 2017, NAS rates ranged from 1.3 per 1000 birth hospitalizations in Nebraska to 53.5 per 1000 birth hospitalizations in West Virginia, with Maine (31.4), Vermont (29.4), Delaware (24.2), and Kentucky (23.9) also exceeding 20 per 1000 birth hospitalizations, while MOD rates ranged from 1.7 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations in Nebraska to 47.3 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations in Vermont, with West Virginia (40.1), Maine (37.8), Delaware (24.3), and Kentucky (23.4) also exceeding 20 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations. From 2010 to 2017, NAS and MOD rates increased significantly for all states except Nebraska and Vermont, which only had MOD increases. Conclusions and Relevance: In the US from 2010 to 2017, estimated rates of NAS and MOD significantly increased nationally and for the majority of states, with notable state-level variation.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etnologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etnologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Subst Use Misuse ; 54(3): 473-481, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30618327

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that relatively few hospitalized patients with opioid-related conditions receive substance use treatment during their inpatient stay. Without treatment, these individuals may be more likely to have subsequent hospitalizations for continued opioid use disorder. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between receipt of inpatient drug detoxification and/or rehabilitation services and subsequent opioid-related readmission. METHODS: This study used combined hospital inpatient discharge and emergency department visit data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Our sample consisted of 329,037 patients from seven states with an opioid-related index hospitalization occurring between March 2010 and September 2013. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between opioid-related readmission and the receipt of inpatient drug detoxification and/or rehabilitation during the index visit. RESULTS: A relatively small percentage (19.4%) of patients with identified opioid-related conditions received treatment for drug use during their hospital inpatient stay. Patients who received drug rehabilitation, but not drug detoxification, during an opioid-related index hospitalization had lower odds of an opioid-related readmission within 90 days of discharge (odds ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-0.67) compared with patients with no inpatient drug detoxification or rehabilitation. Conclusions/Importance: A low percentage of patients receive inpatient services for drug use during an index stay involving an opioid-related diagnosis. Our findings indicate that receipt of drug rehabilitation services in acute care hospitals is associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate. Further research is needed to understand factors associated with the receipt of inpatient services and readmissions.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Internados , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Readmissão do Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/reabilitação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(35): 974-982, 2018 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30188881

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite its preventability, cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs in the United States. This study describes the burden, in 2016, of nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events targeted for prevention by Million Hearts 2022, a national initiative working to prevent one million cardiovascular events during 2017-2021. METHODS: Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations were identified using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases, and deaths were identified using National Vital Statistics System data. Age-standardized Million Hearts-preventable event rates and hospitalization costs among adults aged ≥18 years in 2016 are described nationally and across states, as data permit. Expected 2017-2021 event totals and hospitalization costs were estimated assuming 2016 values remain unchanged. RESULTS: Nationally, in 2016, 2.2 million hospitalizations (850.9 per 100,000 population) resulting in $32.7 billion in costs, and 415,480 deaths (157.4 per 100,000) occurred. Hospitalization and mortality rates were highest among men (989.6 and 172.3 per 100,000, respectively) and non-Hispanic blacks (211.6 per 100,000, mortality only) and increased with age. However, 805,000 hospitalizations and 75,245 deaths occurred among adults aged 18-64 years. State-level variation occurred in rates of ED visits (from 56.4 [Connecticut] to 274.8 per 100,000 [Kentucky]), hospitalizations (484.0 [Wyoming] to 1670.3 per 100,000 [DC]), and mortality (111.2 [Vermont] to 267.3 per 100,000 [Mississippi]). Approximately 16.3 million events and $173.7 billion in hospitalization costs could occur during 2017-2021 without preventive intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Million Hearts-preventable events place a considerable health and economic burden on the United States. With coordinated efforts, many of these events could be prevented in every state to achieve the initiative's goal.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Med Care ; 55(11): 918-923, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28930890

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trend analyses of opioid-related inpatient stays depend on the availability of comparable data over time. In October 2015, the US transitioned diagnosis coding from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to ICD-10-CM, increasing from ∼14,000 to 68,000 codes. This study examines how trend analyses of inpatient stays involving opioid diagnoses were affected by the transition to ICD-10-CM. SUBJECTS: Data are from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for 14 states in 2015-2016, representing 26% of acute care inpatient discharges in the US. STUDY DESIGN: We examined changes in the number of opioid-related stays before, during, and after the transition to ICD-10-CM using quarterly ICD-9-CM data from 2015 and quarterly ICD-10-CM data from the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first 3 quarters of 2016. RESULTS: Overall, stays involving any opioid-related diagnosis increased by 14.1% during the ICD transition-which was preceded by a much lower 5.0% average quarterly increase before the transition and followed by a 3.5% average increase after the transition. In stratified analysis, stays involving adverse effects of opioids in therapeutic use showed the largest increase (63.2%) during the transition, whereas stays involving abuse and poisoning diagnoses decreased by 21.1% and 12.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sharp increase in opioid-related stays overall during the transition to ICD-10-CM may indicate that the new classification system is capturing stays that were missed by ICD-9-CM data. Estimates of stays involving other diagnoses may also be affected, and analysts should assess potential discontinuities in trends across the ICD transition.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/tendências , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
Med Care ; 54(9): 845-51, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27219637

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients who develop hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) are more likely to die, have longer hospital stays, and are at greater risk of infections. Patients undergoing surgery are prone to developing pressure ulcers (PUs). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the hospital marginal cost of a HAPU for adults patients who were hospitalized for major surgeries, adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, and hospital characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Data are from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases and the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System for 2011 and 2012. PU information was obtained using retrospective structured record review from trained MPMS data abstractors. Costs are derived using HCUP hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Marginal cost estimates were made using Extended Estimating Equations. We estimated the marginal cost at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the cost distribution using Simultaneous Quantile Regression. RESULTS: We find that 3.5% of major surgical patients developed HAPUs and that the HAPUs added ∼$8200 to the cost of a surgical stay after adjusting for comorbidities, patient characteristics, procedures, and hospital characteristics. This is an ∼44% addition to the cost of a major surgical stay but less than half of the unadjusted cost difference. In addition, we find that for high-cost stays (75th percentile) HAPUs added ∼$12,100, whereas for low-cost stays (25th percentile) HAPUs added ∼$3900. CONCLUSIONS: This paper suggests that HAPUs add ∼44% to the cost of major surgical hospital stays, but the amount varies depending on the total cost of the visit.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Úlcera por Pressão/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/economia , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 16: 133, 2016 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27089888

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rural/urban variations in admissions for heart failure may be influenced by severity at hospital presentation and local practice patterns. Laboratory data reflect clinical severity and guide hospital admission decisions and treatment for heart failure, a costly chronic illness and a leading cause of hospitalization among the elderly. Our main objective was to examine the role of laboratory test results in measuring disease severity at the time of admission for inpatients who reside in rural and urban areas. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed discharge data on 13,998 hospital discharges for heart failure from three states, Hawai'i, Minnesota, and Virginia. Hospital discharge records from 2008 to 2012 were derived from the State Inpatient Databases of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and were merged with results of laboratory tests performed on the admission day or up to two days before admission. Regression models evaluated the relationship between clinical severity at admission and patient urban/rural residence. Models were estimated with and without use of laboratory data. RESULTS: Patients residing in rural areas were more likely to have missing laboratory data on admission and less likely to have abnormal or severely abnormal tests. Rural patients were also less likely to be admitted with high levels of severity as measured by the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG) severity subclass, derivable from discharge data. Adding laboratory data to discharge data improved model fit. Also, in models without laboratory data, the association between urban compared to rural residence and APR-DRG severity subclass was significant for major and extreme levels of severity (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.43 and 1.55, 95% CI 1.26-1.92, respectively). After adding laboratory data, this association became non-significant for major severity and was attenuated for extreme severity (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94-1.32 and 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.78, respectively). CONCLUSION: Heart failure patients from rural areas are hospitalized at lower severity levels than their urban counterparts. Laboratory test data provide insight on clinical severity and practice patterns beyond what is available in administrative discharge data.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hospitais Rurais , Hospitais Urbanos , Admissão do Paciente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Crit Care Med ; 42(3): 554-64, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24145846

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines for the acute management of emergency department patients with severe sepsis encourage the placement of central venous catheters. Data examining the timing of central venous catheter insertion among critically ill patients admitted from the emergency department are limited. We examined the hypothesis that prompt central venous catheter insertion during hospitalization among patients admitted from the emergency department acts as a surrogate marker for early aggressive care in the management of critically ill patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of emergency department visits using 2003-2006 discharge data from California, State Inpatient Databases, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. SETTING: General medical or general surgical hospitals (n = 310). PATIENTS: Patient hospitalizations beginning in the emergency department with the two most common diagnoses associated with central venous catheter (sepsis and respiratory arrest). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified the occurrence and timing of central venous catheter using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modifications procedure codes. The primary outcomes measured were annual central venous catheters per 1,000 hospitalizations that began in the emergency department occurring emergently (procedure day 0), urgently (procedure day 1-2), or late (procedure day 3 or later). A total of 129,288 hospital discharges had evidence of central venous catheter. In 2003, 5,759 central venous catheters were placed emergently compared with 10,469 in 2006. The rate of emergent central venous catheter/1,000 increased annually from 228 in 2003, 239 in 2004, 257 in 2005, up to 269 in 2006. Urgent and late central venous catheter rates trended down (p < 0.001). In a multilevel model, the odds of undergoing emergent central venous catheter relative to 2003 increased annually: 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.12) in 2004, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.14-1.23) in 2005, and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.23-1.33) in 2006. CONCLUSIONS: Central venous catheters are inserted earlier and more frequently among critically ill patients admitted from the emergency department. Earlier central venous catheter insertion may require systematic changes to meet increasing utilization and enhanced mechanisms to measure central venous catheter outcomes.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , California , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Estado Terminal/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Respiratória/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/mortalidade
9.
JAMA ; 311(7): 709-16, 2014 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24549551

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections can result in substantial morbidity following inpatient surgery. Little is known about serious infections following ambulatory surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of clinically significant surgical site infections (CS-SSIs) following low- to moderate-risk ambulatory surgery in patients with low risk for surgical complications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of ambulatory surgical procedures complicated by CS-SSIs that require a postsurgical acute care visit (defined as subsequent hospitalization or ambulatory surgical visit for infection) using the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Ambulatory Surgery and State Inpatient Databases for 8 geographically dispersed states (California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, and Tennessee) representing one-third of the US population. Index cases included 284 098 ambulatory surgical procedures (general surgery, orthopedic, neurosurgical, gynecologic, and urologic) in adult patients with low surgical risk (defined as not seen in past 30 days in acute care, length of stay less than 2 days, no other surgery on the same day, and discharged home and no infection coded on the same day). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of 14- and 30-day postsurgical acute care visits for CS-SSIs following ambulatory surgery. RESULTS: Postsurgical acute care visits for CS-SSIs occurred in 3.09 (95% CI, 2.89-3.30) per 1000 ambulatory surgical procedures at 14 days and 4.84 (95% CI, 4.59-5.10) per 1000 at 30 days. Two-thirds (63.7%) of all visits for CS-SSI occurred within 14 days of the surgery; of those visits, 93.2% (95% CI, 91.3%-94.7%) involved treatment in the inpatient setting. All-cause inpatient or outpatient postsurgical visits, including those for CS-SSIs, following ambulatory surgery occurred in 19.99 (95% CI, 19.48-20.51) per 1000 ambulatory surgical procedures at 14 days and 33.62 (95% CI, 32.96-34.29) per 1000 at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients in 8 states undergoing ambulatory surgery, rates of postsurgical visits for CS-SSIs were low relative to all causes; however, they may represent a substantial number of adverse outcomes in aggregate. Thus, these serious infections merit quality improvement efforts to minimize their occurrence.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2413127, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787558

RESUMO

Importance: Unprecedented increases in hospital occupancy rates during COVID-19 surges in 2020 caused concern over hospital care quality for patients without COVID-19. Objective: To examine changes in hospital nonsurgical care quality for patients without COVID-19 during periods of high and low COVID-19 admissions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 and 2020 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. Data were obtained for all nonfederal, acute care hospitals in 36 states with admissions in 2019 and 2020, and patients without a diagnosis of COVID-19 or pneumonia who were at risk for selected quality indicators were included. The data analysis was performed between January 1, 2023, and March 15, 2024. Exposure: Each hospital and week in 2020 was categorized based on the number of COVID-19 admissions per 100 beds: less than 1.0, 1.0 to 4.9, 5.0 to 9.9, 10.0 to 14.9, and 15.0 or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were rates of adverse outcomes for selected quality indicators, including pressure ulcers and in-hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, acute stroke, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hip fracture, and percutaneous coronary intervention. Changes in 2020 compared with 2019 were calculated for each level of the weekly COVID-19 admission rate, adjusting for case-mix and hospital-month fixed effects. Changes during weeks with high COVID-19 admissions (≥15 per 100 beds) were compared with changes during weeks with low COVID-19 admissions (<1 per 100 beds). Results: The analysis included 19 111 629 discharges (50.3% female; mean [SD] age, 63.0 [18.0] years) from 3283 hospitals in 36 states. In weeks 18 to 48 of 2020, 35 851 hospital-weeks (36.7%) had low COVID-19 admission rates, and 8094 (8.3%) had high rates. Quality indicators for patients without COVID-19 significantly worsened in 2020 during weeks with high vs low COVID-19 admissions. Pressure ulcer rates increased by 0.09 per 1000 admissions (95% CI, 0.01-0.17 per 1000 admissions; relative change, 24.3%), heart failure mortality increased by 0.40 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 0.18-0.63 per 100 admissions; relative change, 21.1%), hip fracture mortality increased by 0.40 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 0.04-0.77 per 100 admissions; relative change, 29.4%), and a weighted mean of mortality for the selected indicators increased by 0.30 per 100 admissions (95% CI, 0.14-0.45 per 100 admissions; relative change, 10.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, COVID-19 surges were associated with declines in hospital quality, highlighting the importance of identifying and implementing strategies to maintain care quality during periods of high hospital use.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Adulto
11.
JAMA Health Forum ; 4(12): e234206, 2023 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038986

RESUMO

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic had unprecedented effects on hospital occupancy, with consequences for hospital operations and patient care. Previous studies of occupancy during COVID-19 have been limited to small samples of hospitals. Objective: To measure the association between COVID-19 admission rates and hospital occupancy in different US areas and at different time periods during 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases (2019-2020) for patients in nonfederal acute care hospitals in 45 US states, including the District of Columbia. Data analysis was performed between September 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023. Exposures: Each hospital and week in 2020 was categorized based on the number of COVID-19 admissions per 100 beds (<1 [low], 1-4.9, 5-9.9, 10-14.9, or ≥15 [high]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were inpatient and intensive care unit (ICU) occupancy. We used regression analysis to estimate the average change in occupancy for each hospital-week in 2020 relative to the same hospital week in 2019. Results: This study included 3960 hospitals and 54 355 916 admissions. Of the admissions in the 40 states used for race and ethnicity analyses, 15.7% were for Black patients, 12.9% were for Hispanic patients, 62.5% were for White patients, and 7.2% were for patients of other race or ethnicity; 1.7% of patients were missing these data. Weekly COVID-19 admission rates in 2020 were less than 4 per 100 beds for 63.9% of hospital-weeks and at least 10 in only 15.9% of hospital-weeks. Inpatient occupancy decreased by 12.7% (95% CI, 12.1% to 13.4%) during weeks with low COVID-19 admission rates and increased by 7.9% (95% CI, 6.8% to 9.0%) during weeks with high COVID-19 admission rates. Intensive care unit occupancy rates increased by 67.8% (95% CI, 60.5% to 75.3%) during weeks with high COVID-19 admissions. Increases in ICU occupancy were greatest when weighted to reflect the experience of Hispanic patients. Changes in occupancy were most pronounced early in the pandemic. During weeks with high COVID-19 admissions, occupancy decreased for many service lines, with occupancy by surgical patients declining by 43.1% (95% CI, 38.6% to 47.2%) early in the pandemic. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US hospital discharges in 45 states in 2020, hospital occupancy decreased during weeks with low COVID-19 admissions and increased during weeks with high COVID-19 admissions, with the largest changes occurring early in the pandemic. These findings suggest that surges in COVID-19 strained ICUs and were associated with large decreases in the number of surgical patients. These occupancy fluctuations may have affected quality of care and hospital finances.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Pacientes Internados , Pandemias , Estudos Transversais , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Hospitais
12.
J Urol ; 187(4): 1341-5, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22341267

RESUMO

PURPOSE: As the American population ages, benign prostatic hyperplasia and its associated lower urinary tract symptoms have become increasingly important causes of chronic morbidity. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of 2 common forms of surgical therapy, transurethral prostate resection and laser therapy, for benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using patient level discharge data and revisit files from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality we evaluated a cohort of patients who underwent transurethral prostate resection or laser therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 2005 in California. Short-term outcomes, including in hospital complications, length of stay, 30-day rehospitalization, 30-day repeat surgery and 30-day emergency room visits, were compared between the therapies by regression analysis. Long-term re-treatment, defined as the absence of secondary procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia or complications of therapy, was assessed by survival analysis. Analysis was adjusted for medical comorbidity, race, age and insurance status. RESULTS: Data on 11,645 hospital discharges showed that mean length of stay was shorter for laser therapy than for transurethral prostate resection (0.70 vs 2.03 days, p<0.0001). The 30-day repeat visit occurred in 16% of laser and 17.7% of resection cases (p=0.0338). The 4-year re-treatment rate was 8.3% for resection and 12.8% for laser therapy (p<0.0001). After adjustment patients with resection were 37% less likely to require repeat therapy than those with laser therapy (HR 0.64, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Laser procedures and transurethral prostate resection provide effective management of benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms. Laser procedures are associated with less need for hospitalization than transurethral prostate resection but appear to involve a trade-off in long-term efficacy.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos
13.
J Vasc Surg ; 55(5): 1394-9; discussion 1399-400, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22248530

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend in inpatient vascular procedures in the United States over the past decade and predict the future demand for vascular surgeons. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to determine the weighted national estimates of inpatient vascular procedures performed on adult patients (age ≥ 18) between 1997 and 2008. Using population estimates from the United States Census Bureau, the per capita rates of inpatient procedures were calculated for age-specific groups (18-64 years, 65-84 years, and ≥ 85 years). The change in per capita rates over the past decade along with population forecasts were used to predict future workload. RESULTS: There was a net increase of 22% from 971,046 inpatient vascular procedures for all adults in 1997 to 1,188,332 in 2008. During the same time period, the adult population increased by 16% from 198 to 230 million. The age-stratified per capita rates of all vascular procedures were +21% for age 18 to 64; -4% for age 65 to 84; and +18% for age ≥ 85. This resulted in a net increase of 5% (490 to 515 procedures per 100,000 capita) in the per capita rate for all adults. Based on the assumption that trends in age-specific rates remain constant, there is a predicted inpatient workload increase (compared to 2008) of 18% by 2015, 34% by 2020, and 72% by 2030. The vascular workload is predicted to more than double by the year 2040. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a conservative approach of using a population-based analysis of only inpatient procedures, there is a dramatic increase in the predicted vascular workload for the future. The vascular surgery training process will need to adapt to ensure an adequate number of fellowship-trained vascular surgeons is available to provide quality vascular care in the future.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Censos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Adulto Jovem
14.
Health Serv Res ; 57(5): 1006-1019, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35593121

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the quantity and quality of hospital capacity across the United States. DATA SOURCES: We combine a 2017 near-census of US hospital inpatient discharges from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) with American Hospital Association Survey, Hospital Compare, and American Community Survey data. STUDY DESIGN: This study produces local hospital capacity quantity and care quality measures by allocating capacity to zip codes using market shares and population totals. Disparities in these measures are examined by race and ethnicity, income, age, and urbanicity. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: All data are derived from pre-existing sources. All hospitals and zip codes in states, including the District of Columbia, contributing complete data to HCUP in 2017 are included. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Non-Hispanic Black individuals living in zip codes supplied, on average, 0.11 more beds per 1000 population (SE = 0.01) than places where non-Hispanic White individuals live. However, the hospitals supplying this capacity have 0.36 fewer staff per bed (SE = 0.03) and perform worse on many care quality measures. Zip codes in the most urban parts of America have the least hospital capacity (2.11 beds per 1000 persons; SEM = 0.01) from across the rural-urban continuum. While more rural areas have markedly higher capacity levels, urban areas have advantages in staff and capital per bed. We do not find systematic differences in care quality between rural and urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of lower hospital care quality and resource intensity in driving racial and ethnic, as well as income, disparities in hospital care-related outcomes. This study also contributes an alternative approach for measuring local hospital capacity that accounts for cross-hospital service area flows. Adjusting for these flows is necessary to avoid underestimating the supply of capacity in rural areas and overestimating it in places where non-Hispanic Black individuals tend to live.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , População Branca , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , População Rural , Estados Unidos
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(7): e2222966, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35900764

RESUMO

Importance: Surveillance of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is critical for monitoring maternal health and evaluating clinical quality improvement efforts. Objective: To evaluate national and state trends in SMM rates from 2012 to 2019 and potential disruptions associated with the transition to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS) in October 2015. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional analysis examined delivery hospitalizations from 2012 through 2019 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample and State Inpatient Databases, an all-payer compendium of hospital discharge records from community, nonrehabilitation hospitals. Trends were evaluated using segmented linear binomial regression models that allowed for discontinuities across the ICD-10-CM/PCS transition. Analyses were completed from April 2021 through March 2022. Exposures: Time, ICD-10-CM/PCS coding system, and state. Main Outcomes and Measures: SMM rates, excluding blood transfusion, per 10 000 delivery hospitalizations, overall and by indicator. Results: From 2012 to 2019, there were 5 964 315 delivery hospitalizations in the national sample representing a weighted total of 29.8 million deliveries with a mean (SD) maternal age of 28.6 (5.9) years. SMM rates increased from 69.5 per 10 000 in 2012 to 79.7 per 10 000 in 2019 (rate difference [RD], 10.2; 95% CI, 5.8 to 14.6) without a significant change across the ICD-10-CM/PCS transition (RD, -3.2; 95% CI, -6.9 to 0.6). Of 20 SMM indicators, rates for 10 indicators significantly increased while 3 significantly decreased; 5 of these changes were associated with ICD-10-CM/PCS transition. Acute kidney failure had the largest increase, from 6.4 to 15.3 per 10 000 delivery hospitalizations (RD, 8.9; 95% CI, 7.5 to 10.3) with no change associated with ICD transition (RD, -0.1; 95% CI, -1.2 to 1.1). Disseminated intravascular coagulation had the largest decrease from 31.3 to 21.2 per 10 000 (RD, 10.2; 95% CI, -12.8 to -7.5), with a significant drop associated with ICD transition (RD, -7.9; 95% CI, -10.2 to -5.6). State SMM rates significantly decreased for 1 state and significantly increased for 21 states from 2012 to 2019 and associations with ICD transition varied. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, overall US SMM rates increased from 2012 to 2019, which was not associated with the ICD-10-CM/PCS transition. However, data for certain indicators and states may not be comparable across coding systems; efforts are needed to understand SMM increases and state variation.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Idade Materna , Gravidez
16.
Health Serv Res ; 57(3): 654-667, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34859429

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To reweight the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety for Selected Indicators Composite (Patient Safety Indicator [PSI] 90) from weights based solely on the frequency of component PSIs to those that incorporate excess harm reflecting patients' preferences for outcome-related health states. DATA SOURCES: National administrative and claims data involving hospitalizations in nonfederal, nonrehabilitation, acute care hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated the average excess aggregate harm associated with the occurrence of each component PSI using a cohort sample for each indicator based on denominator-eligible records. We used propensity scores to account for potential confounding in the risk models for each PSI and weighted observations to estimate the "average treatment effect in the treated" for those with the PSI event. We fit separate regression models for each harm outcome. Final PSI weights reflected both the disutilities and the frequencies of the harms. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We estimated PSI frequencies from the 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases with present on admission data and excess harms using 2012-2013 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Fee-for-Service data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Including harms in the weighting scheme changed individual component weights from the original frequency-based weighting. In the reweighted composite, PSIs 11 ("Postoperative Respiratory Failure"), 13 ("Postoperative Sepsis"), and 12 ("Perioperative Pulmonary Embolism or Deep Vein Thrombosis") contributed the greatest harm, with weights of 29.7%, 21.1%, and 20.4%, respectively. Regarding reliability, the overall average hospital signal-to-noise ratio for the reweighted PSI 90 was 0.7015. Regarding discrimination, among hospitals with greater than median volume, 34% had significantly better PSI 90 performance, and 41% had significantly worse performance than benchmark rates (based on percentiles). CONCLUSIONS: Reformulation of PSI 90 with harm-based weights is feasible and results in satisfactory reliability and discrimination, with a more clinically meaningful distribution of component weights.


Assuntos
Medicare , Segurança do Paciente , Idoso , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados Unidos , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
17.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(8): 902-908, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34321311

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospital discharge records remain a common data source for tracking the opioid crisis among pregnant women and infants. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) transition from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification may have affected surveillance. Our aim was to evaluate this transition on rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), maternal opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid-related diagnoses (OUD with ICD-10-CM codes for long-term use of opioid analgesics and unspecified opioid use). METHODS: Data from the 2013-2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample were used to conduct, interrupted time series analysis and log-binomial segmented regression to assess whether quarterly rates differed across the transition. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, an estimated 18.8 million birth and delivery hospitalizations were represented. The ICD-10-CM transition was not associated with NAS rates (rate ratio [RR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.08; P = .79) but was associated with 11% lower OUD rates (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-0.98; P = .02) and a decrease in the quarterly trend (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.00; P = .04). The transition was not associated with maternal OUD plus long-term use rates (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.89-1.09; P = .76) but was associated with a 20% overall increase in opioid-related diagnosis rates including long-term and unspecified use (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.09-1.32; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10-CM transition did not appear to affect NAS. However, coding of maternal OUD alone may not capture the same population across the transition, which confounds the interpretation of trend data spanning this time period.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Gravidez
18.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 15(6): 762-769, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33023692

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are critical sources of care after natural disasters such as hurricanes. Understanding the impact on ED utilization by subpopulation and proximity to the hurricane's path can inform emergency preparedness planning. This study examines changes in ED utilization for residents of 344 counties after the occurrence of 7 US hurricanes between 2005 and 2016. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used ED data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and State Emergency Department Databases. ED utilization rates for weeks during and after hurricanes were compared with pre-hurricane rates, stratified by the proximity of the patient county to the hurricane path, age, and disease category. RESULTS: The overall population rate of weekly ED visits changed little post-hurricane, but rates by disease categories and age demonstrated varying results. Utilization rates for respiratory disorders exhibited the largest post-hurricane increase, particularly 2-3 weeks following the hurricane. The change in population rates by disease categories and age tended to be larger for people residing in counties closer to the hurricane path. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in ED utilization following hurricanes depend on disease categories, age, and proximity to the hurricane path. Emergency managers could incorporate these factors into their planning processes.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Tempestades Ciclônicas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Ann Emerg Med ; 56(2): 150-65, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20074834

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are an integral part of the US health care system, and yet national data sources on the care received in the ED are poorly understood, thereby limiting their usefulness for analyses. We provide a comparison of data sources that can be used to examine utilization and quality of care in the ED nationally. DATA SOURCES AND COMPARISONS: This article compares 7 data sources available in 2005 for conducting analyses of ED encounters: the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database(), Hospital Market Profiling Solution(c), National Emergency Department Inventory, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All-Injury Program, and the National Health Interview Survey. In addition to describing the type and scope of data collection, available characteristics, and sponsor of the ED data sources, we compare (where possible) estimates of the total number of EDs, national and regional volume of ED visits, national and regional admission rates (percentage of ED visits resulting in hospital admission), patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and reasons for visit generated by the various data sources. MAJOR FINDINGS: The different data sources yielded estimates of the number of EDs that ranged from 4,609 to 4,884 and the number of ED encounters from more than 109 million to more than 116 million. Admission rates across data sources varied from 12.0% to 15.3%. Although comparisons of the 7 data sources were somewhat limited by differences in available information and operational definitions, variation in estimates of utilization and patterns of care existed by region, expected payer, and patient and hospital characteristics. The rankings and estimates of the top 5 first-listed conditions seen in the ED are relatively consistent between the 2 data sources with diagnoses, although the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample estimates 1.3 to 5.8 times more ED visits for each chronic and acute all-listed condition examined relative to the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. CONCLUSION: Each of the data sources described in this article has unique advantages and disadvantages when used to examine patterns of ED care, making the different data sources appropriate for different applications. Analysts should select a data source according to its construction and should bear in mind its strengths and weaknesses in drawing conclusions based on the estimates it yields.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , American Hospital Association , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Coleta de Dados , Emergências/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA