Is eradication therapy useful as the first line of treatment in Helicobacter pylori-positive idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura? Analysis of 207 eradicated chronic ITP cases in Japan.

A retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection, the effect of H pylori eradication on platelet counts, and the characteristic clinical features of chronic immune or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with H pylori infection. H pylori infection was found in 300 patients, a group that was significantly older (P < .005) and had more cases of hyperplastic megakaryocytes in the bone marrow (P = .01) than patients without H pylori infection. H pylori eradication therapy was performed in 207 H pylori-positive ITP cases, and the platelet count response was observed in 63% of the successful eradication group and in 33% of the unsuccessful eradication group (P < .005). In the successful group, the complete remission and partial remission rates were 23% and 42%, respectively, 12 months after eradication. In the majority of responders, the platelet count response occurred 1 month after eradication therapy, and the increased platelet count continued without ITP treatment for more than 12 months. H pylori eradication therapy was effective even in refractory cases, which were unresponsive to splenectomy. In conclusion, H pylori infection was involved in most ITP patients older than 40 years in Japan, and eradication therapy should be the first line of treatment in H pylori-positive ITP patients.

[Clinical course of the disease and the level of WT1 mRNA in 191 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): joint research by 23 institutions in Japan].

We evaluated the clinical course of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the levels of WT1 mRNA in 191 AML patients. Of 114 previously untreated patients with AML, 107 cases were positive for WT1 mRNA (93.9% : 107/114). WT1 mRNA expression-levels declined to below 50 copies/microg RNA ("negative") after remission was achieved in all 66 patients who achieved remission and 84.8% (47/54) cases were "negative" at the end of the follow-up periods. On the other hand, WT1 mRNA was expressed in 87.0% of non-remission cases (47/54), maintaining 50 copies/microg of RNA or higher ("positive"). In all 29 cases who relapsed during the follow-up observation period after achieving remission, WT1 mRNA levels declined transiently approximately around the time of achieving remission and then rose again when the disease relapsed. Moreover, we determined the time of elevation of WT1 mRNA in 29 relapsed cases. In 79.3% of relapsed cases (23/29), WT1 mRNA levels rose above 200 copies/microg RNA, 43 days (median) before the diagnosis of "relapse". Given the percent of the correct diagnosis, WT1 mRNA at 200 copies/microg RNA appeared to be a reasonable cut-off level for early detection of AML-relapse. The WT1 mRNA level reflected the clinical condition. Taken together, these findings indicate that WT1 mRNA levels allow us to detect the presence of so-called "minimal residual disease" (leukemic cells) that cannot be detected by morphological examination. Besides these promising data, this kit is suitable for routine monitoring of AML because this kit utilizes peripheral blood as a test specimen, reducing the patient's burden at the time of collection of clinical samples as compared with bone marrow aspirate.