Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Econ ; 23(6): 581-592, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063100

RESUMO

Aims: To evaluate total costs and health consequences of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program with colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and expanded use of multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) from the perspectives of Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) and payers in the United States.Materials and methods: We developed a budget impact and cost-consequence model that simulates CRC screening for eligible 50- to 75-year-old adults. A status quo scenario and an increased mt-sDNA scenario were modeled. The status quo includes the current screening mix of colonoscopy (83%), FIT (11%), and mt-sDNA (6%) modalities. The increased mt-sDNA scenario increases mt-sDNA utilization to 28% over 10 years. Costs for both the IDN and the payer perspectives incorporated diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, adverse events (AEs), and CRC treatment. The IDN perspective included screening program costs, composed of direct nonmedical (e.g. patient navigation) and indirect (e.g. administration) costs. It was assumed that IDNs do not incur the costs for stool-based screening tests or bowel preparation for colonoscopies.Results: In a population of one million covered lives, the 10-year incremental cost savings incurred by increasing mt-sDNA utilization was $16.2 M for the IDN and $3.3 M for the payer. The incremental savings per-person-per-month were $0.14 and $0.03 for the IDN and payer, respectively. For both perspectives, increased diagnostic colonoscopy costs were offset by reductions in screening colonoscopies, surveillance colonoscopies, and AEs. Extending screening eligibility to 45- to 75-year-olds slightly decreased the overall cost savings.Limitations: The natural history of CRC was not simulated; however, many of the utilized parameters were extracted from highly vetted natural history models or published literature. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs for CRC screening programs are applied on a per-person-per modality basis, whereas in reality some of these costs may be fixed.Conclusions: Increased mt-sDNA utilization leads to fewer colonoscopies, less AEs, and lower overall costs for both IDNs and payers, reducing overall screening program costs and increasing the number of cancers detected while maintaining screening adherence rates over 10 years.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Colonoscopia/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Sangue Oculto , Cooperação do Paciente , Preferência do Paciente , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
2.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 23(10): 1860-1866, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28858069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fistulas are a common and often debilitating complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and/or seton drainage are effective treatment options. We compared health care utilization and costs for patients with perianal CD who had setons placed before treatment with biologics versus those who did not. METHODS: Patients with CD (≥18 yr) were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Database by ICD-9 code 555.x (January 1, 2006-March 31, 2015); those with external fistulas were identified by ICD-9 codes 565.1. Biological treatment and seton procedures were identified with the National Drug Codes or Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: seton before biological (SBB) treatment or no seton before biological (NSBB) treatment. RESULTS: SBB (N = 326) and NSBB (N = 1519) groups were similar in baseline age, sex, use of immunosuppressants and steroids, and comorbidity score. Baseline prevalence of asthma and cardiovascular disease, and use of antibiotics and 5-aminosalicylic acid were significantly greater in the SBB group versus the NSBB group. Baseline number of all-cause and fistula-related hospitalizations were greater for the SBB group than in the NSBB group. However, during follow-up, the NSBB group required significantly more hospitalizations than the SBB group (all-cause: 0.41 versus 0.23; fistula related: 0.16 versus 0.07) and had significantly greater health care costs (all-cause: $9711 versus $5514; fistula related: $4156 versus $1900). Results were confirmed in multivariate regressions adjusting for baseline characteristics and prescription drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had the setons placed before treatment with biologics used fewer health care resources and incurred lower health care costs compared with those who did not have the procedure.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fístula Retal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Retal/economia , Fístula Retal/etiologia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 23(12): 2089-2096, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961604

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) negatively impacts patient quality of life and results in greater healthcare utilization. For pediatric CD patients, the burden also extends to their caregivers. We aimed to estimate work loss and productivity costs among caregivers of pediatric CD patients. METHODS: Data were from Truven MarketScan databases (2000-2012). Patients were <18 years old with ≥2 ICD-9 CD diagnostic codes. Controls were those without CD or ulcerative colitis and were matched to patients by age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, index year, and insurance plan category. Continuous enrollment was required ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after index, defined as the patient's first CD diagnosis date. Outcomes included hours of work loss and associated productivity costs of caregivers 1-year postindex. Work loss and productivity costs were compared between caregivers of patients and controls. Adjustments for unbalanced baseline factors were made using a generalized linear regression model. RESULTS: Each cohort included 200 study participants and their caregivers. Unadjusted annual hours of work loss after first diagnosis were 214.4 ± 171.5 and 169.6 ± 157.5 for caregivers of CD patients and controls, respectively (P = 0.007). Annual productivity costs were 27.2% ($1122) higher for caregivers of CD patients than controls, estimated at $5243 and $4,121, respectively (P = 0.004). Adjusted cost analyses yielded similar findings. Over the course of a patient's childhood, accumulated productivity losses were $24,118 for CD patients and $18,957 for control caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of pediatric CD patients have significantly higher loss in productivity costs compared with controls.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doença de Crohn/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Licença Médica/economia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA