Clinical and genetic features of a large homogeneous cohort of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy patients from the Canary Islands.

BACKGROUND: Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is an autosomal dominant, late-onset myopathy characterized by ptosis, dysphagia, and progressive proximal limb muscle weakness. The disease is produced by a short expansion of the (GCN)n triplet in the PABPN1 gene. The size of expansion has been correlated to the disease onset and severity. We report the clinical features of a large cohort of OPMD patients harboring the (GCN)15 allele from the Canary Islands. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed analyzing the clinical, demographic, and genetic data of 123 OPMD patients. Clinical data from this cohort were compared with clinical data collected in a large European study including 139 OPMD patients. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients (94.2%) carried the (GCN)15 expanded PABN1 allele. Age of symptoms' onset was 45.1 years. The most frequent symptom at onset was ptosis (85.2%) followed by dysphagia (12%). The severity of the disease was milder in the Canary cohort compared to European patients as limb weakness (35.1% vs. 50.4%), the proportion of patients that require assistance for walking or use a wheelchair (9.3% vs. 27.4%), and needed of surgery because of severe dysphagia (4.6% vs. 22.8%) was higher in the European cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 95% of patients with OPMD from the Canary Islands harbored the (GCN)15 expanded allele supporting a potential founder effect. Disease progression seemed to be milder in the (GCN)15 OPMD Canary cohort than in other cohorts with shorter expansions suggesting that other factors, apart from the expansion size, could be involved in the progression of the disease.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prognosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) in patients with thymoma is not well established. Moreover, it is not clear whether thymoma recurrence or unresectable lesions entail a worse prognosis of MG. METHODS: This multicenter study was based on data from a Spanish neurologist-driven MG registry. All patients were aged >18 years at onset and had anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. We compared the clinical data of thymomatous and nonthymomatous patients. Prognosis of patients with recurrent or nonresectable thymomas was assessed. RESULTS: We included 964 patients from 15 hospitals; 148 (15.4%) had thymoma-associated MG. Median follow-up time was 4.6 years. At onset, thymoma-associated MG patients were younger (52.0 vs. 60.4 years, p < 0.001), had more generalized symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 3.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95-4.68, p < 0.001) and more severe clinical forms according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) scale (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.15-2.21, p = 0.005). Disease severity based on MGFA postintervention status (MGFA-PIS) was higher in thymomatous patients at 1 year, 5 years, and the end of follow-up. Treatment refractoriness and mortality were also higher (OR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.43-3.63, p = 0.001; hazard ratio: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.47-4.14, p = 0.001). Myasthenic symptoms worsened in 13 of 27 patients with recurrences, but differences in long-term severity were not significant. Fifteen thymomatous patients had nonresectable thymomas with worse MGFA-PIS and higher mortality at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoma-associated MG patients had more severe myasthenic symptoms and worse prognosis. Thymoma recurrence was frequently associated with transient worsening of MG, but long-term prognosis did not differ from nonrecurrent thymoma. Patients with nonresectable thymoma tended to present severe forms of MG.

Development and validation of a laboratory-based risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of patients with COVID-19 who may develop critical illness is of great importance. METHODS: In this study a retrospective cohort of 264 COVID-19 cases admitted at Macarena University was used for development and internal validation of a risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to derive the model, including clinical and laboratory variables predictive of critical illness. Internal validation of the final model used bootstrapped samples and the model scoring derived from the coefficients. External validation was performed in a cohort of 154 cases admitted at Valme and Virgen del Rocio University Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 62 (23.5%) patients developed a critical illness during their hospitalization stay, 21 (8.0%) patients needed invasive ventilation, 34 (12.9%) were admitted at the ICU and the overall mortality was of 14.8% (39 cases). 5 variables were included in the final model: age >59.5 years (OR: 3.11;95%CI 1.39-6.97), abnormal CRP results (OR: 5.76;95%CI 2.32-14.30), abnormal lymphocytes count (OR: 3.252;95%CI 1.56-6.77), abnormal CK results (OR: 3.38;95%CI 1.59-7.20) and abnormal creatinine (OR: 3.30;95%CI 1.42-7.68). The AUC of this model was 0.850 with sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 87% and the IDI and NRI were 0.1744 and 0.2785, respectively. The validation indicated a good discrimination for the external population. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers add prognostic information in COVID-19 patients. Our risk-score provides an easy to use tool to identify patients who are likely to develop critical illness during their hospital stay.

Clinical guide for the diagnosis and follow-up of myotonic dystrophy type 1, MD1 or Steinert's disease. / Guía clínica para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la distrofia miotónica tipo 1, DM1 o enfermedad de Steinert.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Steinert's disease or myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1), (OMIM 160900), is the most prevalent myopathy in adults. It is a multisystemic disorder with dysfunction of virtually all organs and tissues and a great phenotypical variability, which implies that it has to be addressed by different specialities with experience in the disease. The knowledge of the disease and its management has changed dramatically in recent years. This guide tries to establish recommendations for the diagnosis, prognosis, follow-up and treatment of the complications of MD1. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consensus guide developed through a multidisciplinary approach with a systematic literature review. Neurologists, pulmonologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, neuropaediatricians and geneticists have participated in the guide. RECOMMENDATIONS: The genetic diagnosis should quantify the number of CTG repetitions. MD1 patients need cardiac and respiratory lifetime follow-up. Before any surgery under general anaesthesia, a respiratory evaluation must be done. Dysphagia must be screened periodically. Genetic counselling must be offered to patients and relatives. CONCLUSION: MD1 is a multisystemic disease that requires specialised multidisciplinary follow-up.

Atraumatic extractions: a biomechanical rationale.

Biomechanical aspects of force have been applied to tooth extraction for centuries. However, the mechanical advantages available to extract the teeth were primarily applied to hold the crown of the tooth, rather than help extract it. An extraction device (Physics Forceps) has been developed to apply a biomechanical rationale to the extraction process of a tooth using a class 1 lever, creep, and shear components of force.

Las confabulaciones: más allá de un déficit mnésico / The confabulations: more than a memory déficit

Las confabulaciones o “mentiras honestas” como las define Marcovich, constituyen un fenómeno complejo cuyo estudio y conceptualización ha ido evolucionando en el último siglo. Inicialmente se consideró a las confabulaciones como un fenómeno eminentemente amnésico con alteraciones principales en la recuperación de la información. Sin embargo la investigación de distintos cuadros clínico-patológicos, ha demostrado que en las confabulaciones interviene una amplia red de procesos cognoscitivos, involucrándose procesos tales como el funcionamiento ejecutivo, emociones, motivación y temporalidad; adicionándose a los subsistemas de memoria ampliamente descritos en la literatura. El presente trabajo constituye una revisión sobre los principales tipos y modelos explicativos de las confabulaciones así como de los avances en la neuropatología de las mismas. Asimismo, se realiza una breve descripción de las confabulaciones en algunos de los principales cuadros nosológicos como son el Síndrome de Korsakoff, la Enfermedad de Alzheimer y la esquizofrenia; resaltando las características compartidas y distintivas entre los distintos cuadros. En forma anexa se describe la relevancia de las emociones en la naturaleza y contenido de las confabulaciones como una posible forma adicional para su caracterización, conceptualización y comprensión. Por último se hace énfasis en la participación del neuropsicólogo durante el proceso de valoración y análisis clínico como parte fundamental en la exploración de rutina e investigación clínica.

The confabulations or "honest lies" as defined by Marcovich, are complex phenomena whose study and conceptualization has been changed in the last century. Initially it was thought confabulation as an eminently amnestic phenomenon with major alterations on the information retrieval; nevertheless, from the research in different clinical and pathological studies, today it is known that the confabulation involved an extensive network of cognitive processes such as executive functioning, emotions, motivation and temporality in addition to the memory subsystems widely described in the literature. The present work constitutes a review of the principal types and confabulation’s explanatory models, including also advances in the neuropathology of them. Likewise, there is a brief description of the confabulations in some of the main nosological tables such as Korsakoff's syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia, highlighting the shared and distinctive features between them. It also describes the relevancy of emotions in the nature and content of the confabulations as a possible additional form for its characterization, conceptualization and understanding. Finally, it emphasizes the participation of neuropsychologist during clinical assessment as a fundamental part in the routine examination and clinical research.