Anti-SAE autoantibody in dermatomyositis: original comparative study and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Among specific autoantibodies in DM, the anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody is rare. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics, cancer prevalence, and muscle pathology of anti-SAE-positive DM. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of DM and sera positive for the anti-SAE antibody were recruited from 19 centres in this retrospective observational study. The available muscular biopsies were reviewed. We conducted a comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Of the patients in the study (n = 49), 84% were women. Skin involvement was typical in 96% of patients, with 10% having calcinosis, 18% ulceration and 12% necrosis; 35% presented with a widespread skin rash. Muscular disease affected 84% of patients, with mild weakness [Medical Research Council (MRC) scale 4 (3, 5)], although 39% of patients had dysphagia. Muscular biopsies showed typical DM lesions. Interstitial lung disease was found in 21% of patients, mainly with organizing pneumonia pattern, and 26% of patients showed dyspnoea. Cancer-associated myositis was diagnosed in 16% of patients and was responsible for the majority of deaths, its prevalence being five times that of the general population. IVIG therapy was administered to 51% of the patients during the course of the disease. Comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM (n = 85) showed less and milder muscle weakness (P = 0.02 and P = 0.006, respectively), lower creatinine kinase levels (P < 0.0001) and less dyspnoea (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Anti-SAE positive DM is a rare subgroup associated with typical skin features but a potentially diffuse rash, a mild myopathy. Interstitial lung disease defines an organizing pneumonia pattern. Cancer associated DM prevalence is five times that of the general population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04637672.

Treatment of bone and joint infections by ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) are two novel antibacterials with known efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of surgical management combined with C/A or C/T treatment for bone and joint infections (BJIs). METHODS: We conducted an observational, bicentric study of patients treated with C/A or C/T for a BJI between May 2016 and June 2019. Failure was defined as the need for unplanned additional antibiotic treatment or orthopaedic surgery, or death due to the BJI up to the patient's latest visit. RESULTS: Overall, 15 patients were included. Nine patients were treated with C/A, mainly for polymicrobial BJI due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, n = 7). Six patients were male, the median age was 66 years and the median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 5. It was the first septic episode at the site in 3/9 patients. The cure rate was 7/9 (median follow-up, 272 days). Two patients showed C/A-related confusion. Five patients were treated with C/T for BJI involving MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Four patients were male, the median age was 53 years and the median CCI was 2. All patients had previous septic episodes at the infection site. The cure rate was 3/5 (median follow-up, 350 days). One patient was successfully treated by C/T then C/A for multistage spondylodiscitis. CONCLUSION: In our experience, C/A and C/T are two effective and safe options, even as salvage treatment for BJI due to MDR-GNB despite the absence of label, however more data are warranted.