Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(8): 1770-1777, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relatively recent availability of effective systemic therapies for metastatic melanoma necessitates reconsideration of current surveillance patterns. Evidence supporting surveillance guidelines for resected Stage II melanoma is lacking. Prior reports note routine imaging detects only 21% of recurrent disease. This study aims to define recurrence patterns for Stage II melanoma to inform future surveillance guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with Stage II melanoma. We analyzed risk factors for recurrence and methods of recurrence detection. We also assessed survival. Yearly hazards of recurrence were visualized. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 158 per 580 patients (27.2%) recurred. Overall, most recurrences were patient-detected (60.7%) or imaging-detected (27.3%). Routine imaging was important in detecting recurrence in patients with distant recurrences (adjusted rate 43.1% vs. 9.4% for local/in-transit; p = .04) and with Stage IIC melanoma (42.5% vs. 18.5% for IIA; p = .01). Male patients also self-detected recurrent disease less than females (52.1% vs. 76.8%; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Routine imaging surveillance played a larger role in detecting recurrent disease for select groups in this cohort than noted in prior studies. In an era of effective systemic therapy, routine imaging should be considered for detection of asymptomatic relapse for select, high-risk patient groups.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Melanoma/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Melanoma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Utah/epidemiologia
2.
Am Surg ; 86(12): 1660-1665, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32755462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality. Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients comprise 7% of hospital admissions in America with a reported rate of VTE of 2.5%. Of these, >69% required hospital readmission, making VTE the second most common cause for readmission after infection in EGS patients. We hypothesize a correlation between body mass index (BMI) and VTE in EGS patients. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Database (NSQIP) was queried from January 2015 to December 2016. 83 272 patients met inclusion criteria: age ≥18 and underwent an EGS procedure. Patients were stratified by BMI. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and numerical data. Categorical comparisons between covariates were completed using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, Mann Whitney U-test, or Kruskal-Wallis H test. RESULTS: 83 272 patients met the inclusion criteria. 1358 patients developed VTE (903 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) only, 335 pulmonary embolism (PE) only, and 120 with DVT and PE). Morbidly obese patients were 1.7 times more likely to be diagnosed with a PE compared with normal BMI (P = .004). Increased BMI was associated with the co-diagnosis of PE and DVT (P = .027). Patients with BMI <18.5 were 1.4 times more likely to experience a VTE compared with normal BMI (P = .018). Patients with a VTE were 3.2 times more likely to die (P < .001) and less likely to be discharged home (P < .001). DISCUSSION: Our study found that obese and underweight EGS patients had an increased incidence of VTE. Risk recognition and chemoprophylaxis may improve outcomes in this population.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Cirurgia Geral , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 83(6): 1108-1113, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic anticoagulation may decrease the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with spine fractures following blunt trauma but comes with the threat of postoperative bleeding in patients requiring stabilization of these fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative anticoagulation on VTE and bleeding complications in patients with blunt spine fractures requiring operative stabilization. METHODS: All patients with blunt spine fractures requiring operative stabilization over a 6-year period were identified. Patients with a hospital stay of less than 48 hours or missing data were excluded. Patients were stratified by age; severity of shock, spinal cord injury, fracture location, injury severity; and timing and duration of anticoagulation. Outcomes included bleeding complications (wound hematoma/infection and development of epidural hematoma) and VTE (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis). Outcomes were evaluated to determine risk factors for bleeding complications and VTE in the management of operative spine fractures. RESULTS: Seven hundred five patients were identified: 355 patients received one dose or more of preoperative anticoagulation, and 350 did not receive preoperative anticoagulation. Seventy-two percent were male, with a mean injury severity score and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 21 and 14, respectively. Bleeding complications occurred in 18 patients (2.6%), and 20 patients (2.8%) had VTE. Patients with VTE were more severely injured (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 vs 15, p ≤ 0.001 and injury severity score of 27 vs 18, p = 0.008). Despite longer time to mobilization (4 vs 2 days, p < 0.001), patients who received 50% or more of their scheduled preoperative doses had fewer episodes of pulmonary embolism (0.4% vs 2.2%, p < 0.05), with no difference in bleeding complications (2.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.63) compared to patients who received either no preoperative anticoagulation or less than 50% of their scheduled preoperative doses. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anticoagulation in patients with operative spine fractures reduced the risk of pulmonary embolism without increasing bleeding complications. Preoperative anticoagulation is both safe and beneficial in patients with operative spine fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Quimioprevenção , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/induzido quimicamente , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Tennessee/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA