RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ApoE genotype and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are known risk factors for cognitive decline in older adults. However, the interaction between these variables is still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the presence of the ApoE ε4 allele and the occurrence of NPS in older adults without dementia. METHODS: In this cross-sectional investigation we determined the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype of 74 older adults who were either cognitively normal (20.3% / Clinician Dementia Rating Scale (CDR): 0) or had mild cognitive impairment (MCI: 79.7% / CDR: 0.5). We used a comprehensive cognitive assessment protocol, and NPS were estimated by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating Scale (NPI-C), Mild Behavioural Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and Apathy Inventory. RESULTS: ApoE ε4 carriers had higher MBI-C total scores than ApoE ε4 noncarriers. Correlations between NPS and ApoE genotype were observed for two NPI-C domains, although in opposite directions: the ApoE ε4 allele was associated with a 1.8 unit decrease in the estimated aberrant motor disturbance score and with a 1.3 unit increase in the estimated appetite/eating disorders score. All fitted models were significant, except for the one fitted for the domain delusions from the NPI-C. Among individuals with amnestic MCI, ε4 carriers presented higher depression score (HAM-D) than noncarriers; in turn, ε4 noncarriers exhibited higher aggression score (NPI-C) than ε4 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses showed associations between NPS and the presence of the ApoE ε4 allele in two NPI-C domains, despite the sample size. Furthermore, compared to noncarriers, the presence of the ApoE ε4 correlated positively with appetite/eating disorders and negatively with aberrant motor disturbance domain. Examination of the amnestic MCI group displayed significant, although weak, associations. Therefore, ε4 carriers exhibited higher depression scores according to the HAM-D scale compared to ε4 noncarriers. Conversely, ε4 noncarriers had higher scores in the aggression domain of the NPI-C than ε4 carriers.
Assuntos
Apolipoproteína E4 , Demência , Idoso , Humanos , Apolipoproteína E4/genética , Apolipoproteínas E , Estudos Transversais , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/genética , GenótipoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The assessment of language changes associated with visual search impairment can be an important diagnostic tool in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the performance of an eye-tracking assisted visual inference language task in differentiating subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia from cognitively unimpaired older adults (controls). METHODS: We assessed a group of 95 older adults (49 MCI, 18 mild dementia due to AD, and 28 controls). The subjects performed the same task under multiple experimental conditions which generate correlated responses that need to be taken into account. Thus, we performed a non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA model for verbal answers, and a linear mixed model (LMM) or its generalized version for the analysis of eye tracking variables. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in verbal answers across all diagnostic groups independently of type of inference, i.e., logic or pragmatic. Also, eye-tracking parameters were able to discriminate AD from MCI and controls. AD patients did more visits to challenge stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SEâ=â0.190, pâ=â0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SEâ=â0.173, pâ=â0.011), more visits to the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -1.363, SEâ=â0.383, pâ=â0.002; MCI-AD, -0.946, SEâ=â0.349, pâ=â0.022), more fixations on distractors (Control-AD, -4.580, SEâ=â1.172, pâ=â0.001; MCI-AD, -2.940, SEâ=â1.070, pâ=â0.020), and a longer time to first fixation on the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SEâ=â0.190, pâ=â0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SEâ=â0.173, pâ=â0.011). CONCLUSION: The analysis of oculomotor behavior along with language assessment protocols may increase the sensitivity for detection of subtle deficits in the MCI-AD continuum, representing an important diagnostic tool.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Demência , Humanos , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Testes de Linguagem , Tecnologia de Rastreamento Ocular , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Idioma , Demência/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To re-evaluate a sample of older adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of lithium for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) after 11 to 15 years, re-assessing their current (or last available) global cognitive and functional state. METHODS: We recalled all former participants of the Lithium-MCI trial conducted by our group between 2009 and 2012 to perform a single-blinded, cross-sectional evaluation of their global clinical state to compare the long-term outcome of those who received lithium vs. those who received placebo. RESULTS: Of the original sample (n=61), we were able to reach 36 participants (59% of retention), of whom 22 had previously received lithium (61% of the recall sample) and 14 (39%) had received placebo. Since 30.5% of the recalled sample was deceased, psychometric data were collected only for 69.5% of the participants. We found statistically significant differences in current mean Mini Mental State Examination score according to previous treatment group (25.5 [SD, 5.3] vs. 18.3 [SD, 10.9], p = 0.04). The lithium group also had better performance in the phonemic Verbal Fluency Test than the control group (34.4 [SD, 14.4] vs. 11.6 [SD, 10.10], p < 0.001). Differences in these measures also had large effect sizes, as shown by Cohen's d values of 0.92 and 1.78, respectively. CONCLUSION: This data set suggests that older adults with amnestic MCI who had been treated with lithium during a previous randomized controlled trial had a better long-term global cognitive outcome than those from a matched sample who did not receive the intervention.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Idoso , Lítio/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Cognição , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eye-movement behavior has been used as a reliable tool to identify cognitive and behavioral patterns in individuals with different neuropsychiatric disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Most studies in the field have been dedicated to evaluating eye-movement behavior during cognitive tasks in different protocols using multiple parameters. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the differences of eye-movement behavior in healthy subjects, subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and those with AD in a simple color task with and without cognitive demand. METHODS: 91 subjects: 18 AD, 47 MCI, and 26 healthy controls had their oculomotor parameters assessed during baseline (no cognitive demand involved) and during a simple computational color memory task using an eye-tracker. RESULTS: Baseline showed statistically different and heterogeneous results between normal cognition and MCI groups. Familiarization phase of the task could not discriminate between groups in any of the analyzed parameters. AD subjects made longer fixations and visits on distractors, and more frequent fixations and visits on the target areas than other groups during the response phase. CONCLUSION: Eye-tracking time-related parameters differentiate AD subjects from other groups under cognitive demand even in a simple color memory task.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Movimentos Oculares , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Cognição , Testes NeuropsicológicosRESUMO
Objectives: To re-evaluate a sample of older adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of lithium for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) after 11 to 15 years, re-assessing their current (or last available) global cognitive and functional state. Methods: We recalled all former participants of the Lithium-MCI trial conducted by our group between 2009 and 2012 to perform a single-blinded, cross-sectional evaluation of their global clinical state to compare the long-term outcome of those who received lithium vs. those who received placebo. Results: Of the original sample (n=61), we were able to reach 36 participants (59% of retention), of whom 22 had previously received lithium (61% of the recall sample) and 14 (39%) had received placebo. Since 30.5% of the recalled sample was deceased, psychometric data were collected only for 69.5% of the participants. We found statistically significant differences in current mean Mini Mental State Examination score according to previous treatment group (25.5 [SD, 5.3] vs. 18.3 [SD, 10.9], p = 0.04). The lithium group also had better performance in the phonemic Verbal Fluency Test than the control group (34.4 [SD, 14.4] vs. 11.6 [SD, 10.10], p < 0.001). Differences in these measures also had large effect sizes, as shown by Cohen's d values of 0.92 and 1.78, respectively. Conclusion: This data set suggests that older adults with amnestic MCI who had been treated with lithium during a previous randomized controlled trial had a better long-term global cognitive outcome than those from a matched sample who did not receive the intervention.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present article addresses intriguing questions related to the clinical intervention in distinct neuropsychiatric syndromes of patients with dementia. RECENT FINDINGS: We reviewed 154 articles published between 2015 and 2016 targeting psychopharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, and safety-tolerability concerns. We selected 115 articles addressing the purpose of this study. Of these, 33 were chosen because they were dedicated to subtopics: agitation (42), depression (33), apathy (18), sleep disorders/anxiety (8), and psychosis (4). Clinical studies using both pharmacological (70) and nonpharmacological (37) interventions were considered; others were included for theoretical support. Regarding the methodological design, we found double-blind RCTs (17), single-blinded RCTs (4), open-label studies (18), case reports (5), cross-sectional or cohort studies (25), epidemiological papers (2), and expert reviews (44). This observation raises concerns about the overall methodological adequacy of a substantial proportion of studies in this field, which limits the potential of generalization of the findings. Finally, 18 studies were designed to determine safety-tolerability issues of psychotropic medications (6 were discussed). SUMMARY: Effective and well tolerated treatment of neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia remains a critically unsolved challenge. We understand that this is an extremely important area of research, and critically required to guide clinical decisions in geriatric neuropsychiatry.