Very long-term outcome after initially successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using pulmonary vein isolation is indicated when patients do not respond favorably to medical therapy. Successful procedures are accomplished in the majority of patients, but the outcome after many years of follow-up after ablation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term recurrence rate and pattern of AF after successful ablation. METHODS: A prospectively identified cohort of 445 patients who demonstrated freedom from AF for at least 1 year postablation (single procedure in 391 [87.9%]) was followed for 66.0 ± 34.0 months. Patients were seen at least annually as outpatients and underwent regular electrocardiographic monitoring. RESULTS: At 40.7 ± 27.0 months postablation, 97 (21.8%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of recurrent AF. The vast majority of events were symptomatic, and no serious clinical events were associated with AF recurrence (eg, stroke). There was a steady attrition rate reaching 16.3% and 29.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 29 patients (29.5%) of the patients, recurrences were self-limited; the remainder required either medical therapy or repeat ablation. By multivariate analysis, persistent AF (hazard ratio 3.08; P < .0001) and hypertension (hazard ratio 1.08; P = .009) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of AF. The presence of both factors placed the patient at high risk of recurrence: 37.6% at 5 years and 68.8% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Over the decade after a successful ablation of AF, most patients continue to demonstrate freedom from AF. At the highest risk of very late recurrence is the subset of patients with hypertension and prior persistent AF.

Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence, risk factors, and the effect of the AigisRx antibacterial envelope.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and risk factors for CIED infection, to develop a scoring index for risk stratification, and to analyze the effect of the AIGISRx envelope on infection rates. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a CIED procedure were identified and surveyed for 6 months for the development of an infection necessitating removal of all implanted hardware. RESULTS: In the pre-envelope era, an infection occurred in 25 (1.5%) of 1651 patients. After its availability, an envelope was used in 275 (22%) of 1240 patients; an infection occurred in 8 (0.6%) patients in this era (P = .029 vs pre-envelope). In the overall cohort of 2891 patients, the infection rate was 1.2% and 3.5% in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device, respectively (P = .018); in these patients, 7 independent risk factors predicted infection: early pocket re-exploration, male sex, diabetes, upgrade procedure, heart failure, hypertension, and glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min. A composite risk score (0-25; C index 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) was created by weight, adjusting these 7 factors: 3 groups emerged-low risk (score 0-7; 1% infection), medium risk (score 8-14; 3.4% infection), and high risk (score ≥15; 11.1% infection). The envelope reduced infections by 79% and 100% in the medium- and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CIED infection most commonly occurred in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device. A composite score based on clinical variables appeared feasible for infection risk stratification. The AIGISRx envelope significantly lowered the risk of CIED infection. Randomized clinical data are warranted.