High-density mapping of Koch's triangle during sinus rhythm and typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, integrated with direct recording of atrio-ventricular node structure potential.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of typical slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and its anatomical and electrophysiological circuit inside the right atrium (RA) and Koch's Triangle (KT) are not well known. OBJECTIVE: To identify the potentials of the compact AV node and inferior extensions and to perform accurate mapping of the RA and KT in sinus rhythm (SR) and during AVNRT, to define the tachycardia circuit. METHODS: Consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were enrolled in 12 Italian centers and underwent mapping and ablation by means of a basket catheter with small electrode spacing for ultrahigh-density mapping and a modified signal-filtering toolset to record the potentials of the AV nodal structures. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive cases of successful ablation of typical slow-fast AVNRT were included. The mean SR cycle length (CL) was 784.1 ± 6 ms and the mean tachycardia CL was 361.2 ± 54 ms. The AV node potential had a significantly shorter duration and higher amplitude in sinus rhythm than during tachycardia (60 ± 40 ms vs. 160 ± 40 ms, p < .001 and 0.3 ± 0.2 mV vs. 0.09 ± 0.12 mV, p < .001, respectively). The nodal potential duration extension was 169.4 ± 31 ms, resulting in a time-window coverage of 47.6 ± 9%. The recording of AV nodal structure potentials enabled us to obtain 100% coverage of the tachycardia CL during slow-fast AVNRT. CONCLUSION: Detailed recording of the potentials of nodal structures is possible by means of multipolar catheters for ultrahigh-density mapping, allowing 100% of the AVNRT CL to be covered. These results also have clinical implications for the ablation of right-septal and para-septal arrhythmias.

Asystole on loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope and negative tilt testing: age distribution and clinical predictors.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with unexplained syncope and negative head-up tilt test (HUTT) who have an electrocardiogram (ECG) documentation of spontaneous syncope during implantable loop recorder (ILR) show an asystolic pause at the time of the event. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the age distribution and clinical predictors of asystolic syncope detected by ILR in patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT. METHODS: This research employed a retrospective, single-center study of consecutive patients. The ILR-documented spontaneous syncope was classified according to the International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) classification. RESULTS: Among 113 patients (54.0 ± 19.6 years; 46% male), 49 had an ECG-documented recurrence of syncope during the observation period and 28 of these later (24.8%, corresponding to 57.1% of the patients with a diagnostic event) had a diagnosis of asystolic syncope at ILR: type 1A was present in 24 (85.7%), type 1B in 1 (3.6%), and type 1C in 3 (10.7%) patients. The age distribution of asystolic syncope was bimodal, with a peak at age < 19 years and a second peak at the age of 60-79 years. At Cox multivariable analysis, syncope without prodromes (OR 3.7; p = 0.0008) and use of beta blockers (OR 3.2; p = 0.002) were independently associated to ILR-detected asystole. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT, the age distribution of asystolic syncope detected by ILR is bimodal, suggesting a different mechanism responsible for asystole in both younger and older patients. The absence of prodromes and the use of beta blockers are independent predictors of ILR-detected asystole.

Prevalence and clinical predictors of vasodepressor syncope during head up tilt test.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical predictors of vasodepressor (VD) response during head-up tilt test (HUTT) in patients with history of syncope admitted to a tertiary referral syncope unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent HUTT for suspected or established reflex syncope at our institution from March 1st, 2017, to June 1st, 2023. VD response was defined when syncope occurred during hypotension along with no or slight (< 10% bpm) decrease of heart rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the association of VD response to HUTT with a set of clinical covariates. RESULTS: 1780 patients (40 ± 19.9 years; 49.3% male) were included; among them, 1132 (63 %) showed a positive response to HUTT and 124 (7.0%) had a VD response. The prevalence of VD response showed a peak after 69 years (11.52% vs 6.18%; P = 0.0016), mainly driven by male patients (13.7% vs 4.9%; P < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.15; P = 0.0026) was independently associated to HUTT-induced VD syncope; in contrast, smoking (OR: 0.33: P = 0.0009) and non-classical presentation of syncope (OR: 0.55; P = 0.0029) inversely correlated with VD syncope. CONCLUSIONS: VD response represents the less frequent responses among those induced by HUTT, accounting up to 7% of overall responses. A gender and age-related distribution has been shown. Advanced age was the only independent predictor of VD syncope; conversely, smoking and non-classical presentation of syncope reduced the probability of VD response to HUTT.