Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 11(8): e004464, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30354373

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prehospital ECG-based cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction reduces door-to-balloon times, but CCL cancellations (CCLX) remain a challenging problem. We examined the reasons for CCLX, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients presenting as ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction activations who receive emergent coronary angiography (EA) compared with CCLX. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed all consecutive CCL activations between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014 (n=1332). Data were analyzed comparing 2 groups stratified as EA (n=466) versus CCLX (n=866; 65%). Reasons for CCLX included bundle branch block (21%), poor-quality prehospital ECG (18%), non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ST changes (18%), repolarization abnormality (13%), and arrhythmia (8%). A multivariate logistic regression model using age, peak troponin, and initial ECG findings had a high discriminatory value for determining EA versus CCLX (C statistic, 0.985). CCLX subjects were older and more likely to be women, have prior coronary artery bypass grafting, or a paced rhythm ( P<0.0001 for all). All-cause mortality did not differ between groups at 1 year or during the study period (mean follow-up, 2.186±1.167 years; 15.8% EA versus 16.2% CCLX; P=0.9377). Cardiac death was higher in the EA group (11.8% versus 3.0%; P<0.0001). After adjusting for clinical variables associated with survival, CCLX was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality during the study period (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28-2.59; P=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, prehospital ECG without overreading or transmission lead to frequent CCLX. CCLX subjects differ with regard to age, sex, risk factors, and comorbidities. However, CCLX patients represent a high-risk population, with frequently positive cardiac enzymes and similar short- and long-term mortality compared with EA. Further studies are needed to determine how quality improvement initiatives can lower the rates of CCLX and influence clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Angiografia Coronária , Eletrocardiografia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendências , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Angiografia Coronária/tendências , Eletrocardiografia/tendências , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/tendências , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Procedimentos Desnecessários/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA