Acceptability and Effectiveness of Assisted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Partner Services in Mozambique: Results From a Pilot Program in a Public, Urban Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Assisted partner services (APS) involves offering persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) assistance notifying and testing their sex partners. Assisted partner services is rarely available in sub-Saharan Africa. We instituted a pilot APS program in Maputo, Mozambique. METHODS: Between June and September 2014, community health workers (CHWs) offered APS to persons with newly diagnosed HIV (index patients [IPs]). Community health workers interviewed IPs at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. At baseline, CHWs counseled IPs to notify partners and encourage their HIV testing, but did not notify partners directly. At 4 weeks, CHWs notified partners directly. We compared 4- and 8-week outcomes to estimate the impact of APS on partner notification, HIV testing and HIV case finding. RESULTS: Community health workers offered 223 IPs APS, of whom 220 (99%) accepted; CHWs collected complete follow-up data on 206 persons; 79% were women, 74% were married, and 50% named >1 sex partner. Index patients named 262 HIV-negative partners at baseline. At 4 weeks, before APS, IPs had notified 193 partners (74%), but only 82 (31%) had HIV tested; 43 (13%) tested HIV positive. Assisted partner services resulted in the notification of 22 additional partners, testing of 83 partners and 43 new HIV diagnoses. In relative terms, APS increased partner notification, testing, and HIV case finding by 13%, 101%, and 125%. Seventy-two (35%) of 206 IPs were in ongoing HIV serodiscordant partnerships. Only 2.5 IPs needed to receive APS to identify a previously undiagnosed HIV-infected partner or an ongoing HIV serodiscordant partnership. Two (1%) IPs reported APS-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Assisted partner services is acceptable to Mozambicans newly diagnosed with HIV, identifies large numbers of serodiscordant partnerships and persons with undiagnosed HIV, and poses a low risk of adverse events.

Sociodemographic associated factors with non-disclosure of HIV sero-status to sexual partners in Maputo, Mozambique.

The HIV prevalence in Maputo city is 16.2%. There is a lack of data describing associated factors with disclosure or non-disclosure of HIV-positive sero-status to sexual partners. This analysis describes associated factors of non-disclosure of HIV sero-status to sexual partners among people living with HIV (PLHIV) participating in a serostatus disclosure support program at three health facilities in Maputo, Mozambique. We used a cross-sectional design of PLHIV aged over 18 years. Datas were collected between December 2019 and September 2020. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated of non-disclosure of HIV sero-status. A total of 377 patients were enrolled in the HIV sero-status disclosure Program. Of these, nearly two-thirds (61.5%) were women, 52.9% had completed secondary school, 47.7% were 25-34 years old, 50.9% had informal employment with low income, and 73.2% were married. Univariate logistic regression model showed greater odds of non-disclosure among patients who had an employment contract with a maximum wage (Crude Odds Ratio [cOR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.55, p = 0.015); were single (cOR 3.85, 95% CI 2.22-6.69, p < 0.001); were living with parents (cOR 2.30, 95% CI 1.07-4.93, p = 0.033); received financial support for their monthly household expenses from parents or a close relative (cOR 7.15, 95% CI 2.19-23.36, p = 0.001); or brought a parent/close relative and/or a friend as a confidant during HIV care(cOR 3.17, 95% CI 1.74-5.76, p < 0.001; and cOR 5.97, 95% CI 1.57-22.66, p = 0.009, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression model showed: from parents/close relative and from partner (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 8.19, 95% CI 1.44-46.46, p = 0.018; and aOR 4.34, 95% CI 1.05-17.17, p = 0.043), respectively); in those who brought a parent/close relative and/or a friend as a confidant during HIV care (aOR 8.86, 95% CI 2.16-36.31, p = 0.002; and 195 aOR 21.68, 95% CI 3.02-155.87, p = 0.002, respectively). Non-disclosure of serostatus is a critical issue for HIV care and treatment programs, given that non-disclosure of HIV serostatus increases risk of HIV transmission. Understanding the factors associated with non-disclosure is crucial for designing strategies to address these factors and end the HIV epidemic by 2030. Our findings suggest that HIV serostatus disclosure programs might target the sociodemographic factors strongly associated with non-disclosure.

Assisted Partner Notification Services Are Safe and Effective as They Are Brought to Scale in Mozambique.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends that persons diagnosed with HIV be offered assisted partner notification services (APS). There are limited data on the safety of APS as implemented in public health programs. SETTING: Three public health centers in Maputo, Mozambique, 2016-2019. METHODS: Counselors offered APS to persons with newly diagnosed HIV and, as part of a program evaluation, prospectively assessed the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), including (1) pushing, abandonment, or yelling; (2) being hit; and (3) loss of financial support or being expelled from the house. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand nine hundred sixty-five persons tested HIV-positive in the 3 clinics, 13,475 (71%) were evaluated for APS eligibility, 9314 were eligible and offered APS, and 9219 received APS. Index cases (ICs) named 8933 partners without a previous HIV diagnosis, of whom 6137 tested and 3367 (55%) were diagnosed with HIV (case-finding index = 0.36). APS counselors collected follow-up data from 6680 (95%) of 7034 index cases who had untested partners who were subsequently notified; 78 (1.2%) experienced an AE. Among 270 ICs who reported a fear of AEs at their initial APS interview, 211 (78%) notified ≥1 sex partner, of whom 5 (2.4%) experienced an AE. Experiencing an AE was associated with fear of loss of support (odds ratio [OR] 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50 to 12.19) and having a partner who was notified, but not tested (OR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.93 to 6.26). CONCLUSION: Case-finding through APS in Mozambique is high and AEs after APS are uncommon. Most ICs with a fear of AEs still elect to notify partners with few experiencing AEs.

Assisted HIV partner services training in three sub-Saharan African countries: facilitators and barriers to sustainable approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare worker training is essential to successful implementation of assisted partner services (aPS), which aims to improve HIV testing and linkage-to-care outcomes for previously unidentified HIV-positive individuals. Cameroon, Kenya and Mozambique are three African countries that have implemented aPS programmes and are working to bring those programmes to scale. In this paper, we present and compare different aPS training strategies implemented by these three countries, and discuss facilitators and barriers associated with implementation of aPS training in sub-Saharan Africa. DISCUSSION: aPS training programmes in Cameroon, Kenya and Mozambique share the following components: the development of comprehensive and interactive training curricula, recruitment of qualified trainees and trainers with intimate knowledge of the community served, continuous training, and rigorous monitoring and evaluation activities. Cameroon and Kenya were able to engage various stakeholders early on, establishing multilateral coalitions that facilitated attainment of long-term buy-in from the local governments. Ministries of Health and various implementing partners are often included in strategic planning and delivery of training curricula to ensure sustainability of the training programmes. Kenya and Mozambique have integrated aPS training into the national HTS guidelines, which are being rolled out nationwide by the Ministries of Health and implementing partners. Continual revision of training curricula to reflect the country context, as well as ongoing monitoring and evaluation, have also been identified as key facilitators to sustain aPS training programmes. Some of the barriers to scale-up and sustainability of aPS training include limited funding and resources for training and scale-up and shortage of aPS providers to facilitate on-the-job mentorship. CONCLUSIONS: These three programmes demonstrate that aPS training can be implemented and scaled up in sub-Saharan Africa. As countries plan for initial implementation or national scale-up of aPS services, they will need to establish government buy-in, expand funding sources, address the shortage of staff and resources to provide aPS and on-the-job mentorship, and continuously collect data to evaluate and improve aPS training plans. Development of national standards for aPS training, empowered healthcare providers, increased government commitment, and sustained funding for aPS services and training will be crucial for successful aPS implementation.