Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 18 Suppl 2: 25-35, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26567853

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health and hearing outcomes from the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG, 1998) and the Cleft Care UK (CCUK, 2013) studies. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Two UK-based cross-sectional studies of 5-year-olds born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate undertaken 15 years apart. CSAG children were treated in a dispersed model of care with low-volume operators. CCUK children were treated in a centralized, high volume operator system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral health data were collected using a standardized proforma. Hearing was assessed using pure tone audiometry and middle ear status by otoscopy and tympanometry. ENT and hearing history were collected from medical notes and parental report. RESULTS: Oral health was assessed in 264 of 268 children (98.5%). The mean dmft was 2.3, 48% were caries free, and 44.7% had untreated caries. There was no evidence this had changed since the CSAG survey. Oral hygiene was generally good, 96% were enrolled with a dentist. Audiology was assessed in 227 of 268 children (84.7%). Forty-three per cent of children received at least one set of grommets--a 17.6% reduction compared to CSAG. Abnormal middle ear status was apparent in 50.7% of children. There was no change in hearing levels, but more children with hearing loss were managed with hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for dental caries and hearing were no better in CCUK than in CSAG, although there was reduced use of grommets and increased use of hearing aids. The service specifications and recommendations should be scrutinized and implemented.


Assuntos
Fenda Labial/complicações , Fissura Palatina/complicações , Cárie Dentária , Saúde Bucal , Audiologia , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 25(11): 1389-400, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21921955

RESUMO

The entity described by Gunnar Stickler, which included hereditary arthro-ophthalmopathy associated with retinal detachment, has recently been recognised to consist of a number of subgroups, which might now more correctly be referred to as the Stickler syndromes. They are the most common clinical manifestation of the type II/XI collagenopathies and are the most common cause of inherited rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This review article is intended to provide the ophthalmologist with an update on current research, subgroups, and their diagnosis together with a brief overview of allied conditions to be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis. We highlight the recently identified subgroups with a high risk of retinal detachment but with minimal or absent systemic involvement--a particularly important group for the ophthalmologist to identify.


Assuntos
Artrite/diagnóstico , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Descolamento Retiniano/etiologia , Artrite/complicações , Artrite/genética , Colágeno Tipo II/genética , Colágeno Tipo XI/genética , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/complicações , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Transtornos da Audição/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/complicações , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/genética , Humanos , Anormalidades Maxilomandibulares/etiologia , Fenótipo , Descolamento Retiniano/complicações , Descolamento Retiniano/diagnóstico , Descolamento Retiniano/genética , Corpo Vítreo/química
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA