The use of medial support screw was associated with axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of humeral fractures using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. We hypothesized that the use of medial support screw (MSS) would be associated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive 32 patients who underwent surgical treatments for proximal or midshaft humeral fractures. Of them, we included 26 patients who were examined by electromyography/nerve conduction (EMG/NCV) study at 3-4 weeks postoperatively. We excluded 6 patients because two of them were not compliant to EMG/NCV and the remaining two died due to unrelated medical illness. Outcome assessments included pain, functional scores, range of motion, and radiographic results. RESULTS: There were 8 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 67 ± 15 years. Mean duration of follow-up period was 31 ± 11 months. The mean time to EMG/NCS after surgery was 3.5 ± 0.6 weeks. EMG/NCS examinations revealed incomplete axillary nerve injury in 8 patients (31%) without complete nerve injury. Active forward elevation at 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without it (99° ± 12 and 123° ± 37, respectively, p = 0.047), although final clinical outcomes were not different. At surgery, MSS was used in 17 patients (65%), and 8 of them were associated with nerve injury. The use of MSS was only correlated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury, because the axillary nerve injury developed only in MSS group (p = 0.047). The MMT grade 4 in abduction strength was more common in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary nerve injury was a concern after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. The use of medial support screw to improve the stability could increase a risk of axillary nerve injury when used with this approach.

Proximal vs Distal Approach of Ultrasound-guided Suprascapular Nerve Block for Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early clinical outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) using a proximal approach compared with a distal approach for outpatient treatment of adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=47) with symptomatic adhesive capsulitis. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to either US-guided SSNB using a proximal approach (n=23, proximal group) or a distal approach (n=24, distal group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at week 12. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon's (ASES) score, University California Los Angeles score, Short Form-36 mental and physical component summaries, and range of motion. All patients completed clinical follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment. On US images, depth and insertion angle of needle during injection were measured. RESULTS: The VAS significantly improved in both groups at week 12. After treatment, no significant differences were found in early clinical outcomes (weeks 2, 6, and 12) between groups (all P>.05), except that ASES at 2 weeks showed a significantly higher score in the distal group than in the proximal group (87.1±4.8 and 83.0±6.3, respectively; P=.014). The mean depth and insertion angle of needle was significantly lower (depth: 13.4±3.9 and 30.6±4.3 mm, respectively; P<.001; insertion angle: 19.6°±6.4° and 38.7°±5.8°; P<.001) in the proximal group than in the distal group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that proximal approach of US-guided SSNB provided favorable short-term outcomes of pain and functional improvement and that outcomes were comparable to those of the distal approach in adhesive capsulitis. The suprascapular nerve was located more superficially and easily identified in the proximal approach, suggesting that this method might improve the accuracy of injection.

Outcome of Second-Ray Pathologies Following Weil Osteotomy in Patients Treated for Hallux Valgus.

Background: We hypothesized that the cause of second-ray pathology with hallux valgus is excessive relative length of the second metatarsal and performed Weil osteotomy to shorten it, with correction of hallux valgus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of second-ray pathology after distal chevron osteotomy (DCO) with Weil osteotomy to correct metatarsal parabola. Methods: We performed concomitant Weil osteotomy of the second metatarsal with DCO of the first metatarsal as part of hallux valgus with second-ray pathology correction surgery in 45 feet (40 patients). Second-ray pathologies were claw toe deformity, painful plantar callosity, second metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) dislocation, and osteoarthritis (OA) of the second MTPJ. We measured projection of the second metatarsal (PSM), metatarsal protrusion index (MPI), and metatarsal protrusion distance (MPD). The second-ray surgery outcome was assessed by patient satisfaction. Results: Patient satisfaction was good in claw toe deformity and OA (satisfaction rate: 60% [23 patients] and 71% [7 patients], respectively) and fair in painful plantar callosity and second MTP joint dislocation (satisfaction rate: 44% [9 patients] and 33% [6 patients], respectively). Total patient satisfaction rate was higher when the PSM, MPI, and MPD ranged between 7 and 12 mm, -5 and 0 mm, and 0 and 4 mm, respectively. Conclusions: We concluded that simultaneous performance of hallux valgus correction and Weil osteotomy in patients with second-ray pathologies associated with hallux valgus was safe as well as effective. Correcting the metatarsal parabola within the appropriate range after surgery is associated with second-ray pathology outcome. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic studies, Level VI: Case series.