Percutaneous approach to left ventricular assist device decommissioning.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of a single-center experience with percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) decommissioning. BACKGROUND: Patients with LVADs may eventually require their removal, either due to recovery of left ventricular function or recurrent complications. Traditionally, withdrawal of LVAD support has been managed with surgical device explantation, which carries significant procedural risks. Transcatheter LVAD decommissioning, with outflow graft occlusion and driveline transection, has recently been described as an alternative to surgical removal. METHODS: Here, we report on a retrospective cohort of five consecutive cases treated with transcatheter LVAD decommissioning. RESULTS: The procedure was effective in all cases, and no patient experienced procedure-related complications. At midterm follow-up, the three patients who had myocardial function recovery were alive and had not experienced heart failure-related symptoms or complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous LVAD decommissioning appears to be a safe and effective approach to LVAD treatment discontinuation.

An interventional approach to left ventricular assist device outflow graft obstruction.

BACKGROUND: LVADs provide life-sustaining treatment for patients with heart failure, but their complexity allows for complications. One complication, LVAD outflow graft obstruction, may be misdiagnosed as intraluminal thrombus, when more often it is extraluminal compression from biodebris accumulation. It can often be treated endovascularly with stenting. This case series describes diagnostic and procedural techniques for the treatment of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outflow graft obstruction. METHODS: We present four patients with LVADs who developed LVAD outflow graft obstruction within the bend relief-covered segment. All were initially diagnosed with computed tomographic angiography (CTA). All underwent invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), then were treated with stenting. After misdiagnosing a twist, we developed the technique of balloon "graftoplasty" to ensure suitability for stent delivery in subsequent cases. RESULTS: All patients presented with low-flow alarms and symptoms of low output, and were diagnosed with outflow graft obstruction by CTA. In all four, IVUS confirmed an extraluminal etiology. Patient 1 was treated with stenting and had a good outcome. Patient 2's obstruction was from twisting, rather than biodebris accumulation, and had sub-optimal stent expansion and ultimately required surgery. Balloon "graftoplasty" was used in subsequent cases to ensure subsequent stent expansion. Patients 3 and 4 were successfully stented. All improved after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LVAD outflow graft obstruction, IVUS can distinguish intraluminal thrombus from extraluminal compression. Balloon "graftoplasty" can ensure that the outflow graft will respond to stenting. Many cases of LVAD outflow graft obstruction should be amenable to endovascular treatment.