Preclinic telephone consultations: an observational cohort study.

Patients referred to secondary care for specialist respiratory review frequently undergo multiple hospital attendances for investigations and consultations. This study evaluated the potential of a preclinic telephone consultation and subsequent coordination of tests and face-to-face consultations to reduce hospital visits. Total hospital attendances were recorded for three cohorts (participants, non-participants and comparators) for 6 months from first specialist contact. Patients completed the medical interview satisfaction scale-21 (MISS-21). The study showed that a preclinic telephone consultation can significantly reduce hospital visits over a fixed period without reducing patient satisfaction. In total, 20.8% of the participant group had three or more hospital attendances compared with 42.9% of the non-participant group (p = 0.001) and 44.7% of the comparator group (p = 0.002). Participants had fewer follow up visits and lower rates of non-attendance/late rearrangement of appointments. This service reduces unnecessary hospital visits, seems to improve patient compliance and may save costs associated with non-attendance and follow up consultations.

Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study.

In between exacerbations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is usually regarded as a stable condition, but there is increasing recognition of variability in this state. This cross-sectional study assessed patients' perception of symptom variability. Participants were outpatients > 45 yrs old with COPD, current or ex-smokers, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <50% predicted, FEV1/forced vital capacity < 0.7 and no exacerbation leading to therapeutic intervention in the previous 3 months. Patients' perceptions of COPD symptoms and their impact on daily life activities were recorded. Alterations in therapy use in response to COPD worsening were also recorded. COPD symptoms were experienced by 2,258 (92.5%) out of 2,441 patients during the 7 days before interview. Breathlessness was the most common symptom (72.5%). Daily and/or weekly symptom variability was reported by 62.7% of symptomatic patients; the morning was the worst time of day. Factors associated with perception of variability of breathlessness included younger age, symptom severity and recruitment to the study by general practitioners. The perception of variability was significantly different between European countries or regions. Patient-perceived COPD symptoms vary over the day and the week, and impact on daily activities; morning being the worst time of day. The majority of patients appear not to adjust treatment when symptoms worsen.

Evaluation of a paper and electronic pictorial COPD action plan.

Personalised written action plans are increasingly regarded as an important component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management support and yet they may not be understood by those with limited literacy skills. This study was designed to produce a comprehensible pictorial COPD action plan for use by patients and health care professionals. With advice from a group of doctors and nurses a 'standard' written COPD action plan was translated by a medical artist into a series of pictorial images. These were assessed using the techniques of guessability and translucency in 21 adults attending a COPD clinic in a London hospital. Guessability and translucency scores show that pictograms were reasonably well understood, with only 3 pictograms showing low score in both guessability and translucency questionnaires. These included images depicting increased sputum production, swollen ankles, and use of extra doses of reliever medication. However, after brief spoken reinforcement about self-management, most patients could use the pictorial plan to suggest appropriate self-management behaviour such as when to access medical care. We have developed a pictorial COPD action plan. Pictorial methods represent an effective method of reinforcing the spoken word for all ranges of literacy.

Development and validation of the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning questionnaire and the Global Chest Symptoms Questionnaire in COPD.

This report concerns the development and validation of two patient-reported outcomes questionnaires developed to assess chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients' ability to perform morning activities and to evaluate their morning symptoms. Based on interviews with COPD patients, the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning (CDLM) questionnaire and the Global Chest Symptoms Questionnaire (GCSQ) were developed, linguistically validated and incorporated into two multicentre, randomised trials involving a total of 1,100 COPD patients; those trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00496470 and NCT00542880). Data from these trials were used to determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the questionnaires and to derive estimates of minimal important differences (MIDs). Both questionnaires displayed good-to-high reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.75-0.93). Analysis of convergent validity showed that CDLM and GCSQ scores correlated significantly (p<0.001) with symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and use of rescue medication. In both trials, CDLM and GCSQ scores discriminated between patients with different levels of HRQoL, as assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients (SGRQ-C), but not with disease severity, as assessed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. A significant improvement in CDLM and GCSQ scores occurred in response to treatment. Estimations of MID scores, corresponding to an SGRQ-C MID of 4, were 0.20 for the CDLM questionnaire and 0.15 for the GCSQ. Both the CDLM questionnaire and the GCSQ are easy-to-use, reliable, responsive, self-administered questionnaires that report on patients' symptoms and ability to perform morning activities.

Delivery of asthma and allergy care in Europe.

BACKGROUND: There is no comprehensive information available concerning the way in which care is provided for those with allergic conditions in Europe. OBJECTIVE: To determine who cares for those with asthma, allergic dermatitis, and rhinitis in Europe and to determine the involvement of primary care and other healthcare professionals and the use of patient education and guidelines. METHODS: A questionnaire survey of colleagues in 43 institutions in 33 European countries with results being related to published sources of information regarding prevalence of allergic diseases in different countries and published data regarding availability of doctors and expenditure on healthcare. RESULTS: A total of 33 of 43 institutions completed the survey (76.7%) with information being obtained from 26 of the 33 countries surveyed (78.7%). There are wide differences in the use of different healthcare professionals in different countries, with those for asthma, for example, being most likely to be cared for by an allergologist in some countries and by a primary care physician in many others. There was much greater awareness of guidelines for asthma and little reported usage of guidelines in the management of those with allergic skin diseases, and while self-management education was offered most to those with asthma, there was a wide variation in the usage of group education. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the differences revealed by this survey cannot be explained by the availability of different healthcare professionals nor by differences in healthcare expenditure, and such differences need further evaluation to determine their effect on outcomes and the economics of healthcare so that we may determine that which is optimal.

A nurse led intermediate care package in patients who have been hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of a nurse led intermediate care programme in patients who have been hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Community and hospital care in west London. PARTICIPANTS: 122 patients with COPD. INTERVENTION: A care package incorporating initial pulmonary rehabilitation and self-management education, provision of a written, personalised COPD action plan, monthly telephone calls and 3 monthly home visits by a specialist nurse for a period of 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hospital readmission rate. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Unscheduled primary care consultations and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no differences in hospital admission rates or in exacerbation rates between the two groups. Self-management of exacerbations was significantly different and the intervention group were more likely to be treated with oral steroids alone or oral steroids and antibiotics, and the initiators of treatment for exacerbations were statistically more likely to be the patients themselves. 12 patients in the control group died during the 2 year period, eight as a result of COPD, compared with six patients in the intervention group, of whom one died from COPD. This is a significant difference. When the numbers were adjusted to reflect the numbers still alive at 2 years, in the intervention group patients reported a total of 171 unscheduled contacts with their general practitioner (GP) and in the control group, 280 contacts. The number needed to treat was 0.558--ie, for every one COPD patient receiving the intervention and self-management advice, there were 1.79 fewer unscheduled contacts with the GP. CONCLUSIONS: An intermediate care package incorporating pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management education and the receipt of a written COPD action plan, together with regular nurse contact, is associated with a reduced need for unscheduled primary care consultations and a reduction in deaths due to COPD but did not affect the hospital readmission rate.

Can lay people deliver asthma self-management education as effectively as primary care based practice nurses?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether well trained lay people could deliver asthma self-management education with comparable outcomes to that achieved by primary care based practice nurses. DESIGN: Randomised equivalence trial. SETTING: 39 general practices in West London and North West England. PARTICIPANTS: 567 patients with asthma who were on regular maintenance therapy. 15 lay educators were recruited and trained to deliver asthma self-management education. INTERVENTION: An initial consultation of up to 45 min offered either by a lay educator or a practice based primary care nurse, followed by a second shorter face to face consultation and telephone follow-up for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unscheduled need for healthcare. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction and need for courses of oral steroids. RESULTS: 567 patients were randomised to care by a nurse (n = 287) or a lay educator (n = 280) and 146 and 171, respectively, attended the first face to face educational session. During the first two consultations, management changes were made in 35/146 patients seen by a practice nurse (24.0%) and in 56/171 patients (32.7%) seen by a lay educator. For 418/567 patients (73.7%), we have 1 year data on use of unscheduled healthcare. Under an intention to treat approach, 61/205 patients (29.8%) in the nurse led group required unscheduled care compared with 65/213 (30.5%) in the lay led group (90% CI for difference -8.1% to 6.6%; 95% CI for difference -9.5% to 8.0%). The 90% CI contained the predetermined equivalence region (-5% to +5%) giving an inconclusive result regarding the equivalence of the two approaches. Despite the fact that all patients had been prescribed regular maintenance therapy, 122/418 patients (29.2%) required courses of steroid tablets during the course of 1 year. Patient satisfaction following the initial face to face consultation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to recruit and train lay educators to deliver a discrete area of respiratory care, with comparable outcomes to those seen by nurses.

A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control.

Concepts of asthma severity and control are important in the evaluation of patients and their response to treatment but the terminology is not standardised and the terms are often used interchangeably. This review, arising from the work of an American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force, identifies the need for separate concepts of control and severity, describes their evolution in asthma guidelines and provides a framework for understanding the relationship between current concepts of asthma phenotype, severity and control. "Asthma control" refers to the extent to which the manifestations of asthma have been reduced or removed by treatment. Its assessment should incorporate the dual components of current clinical control (e.g. symptoms, reliever use and lung function) and future risk (e.g. exacerbations and lung function decline). The most clinically useful concept of asthma severity is based on the intensity of treatment required to achieve good asthma control, i.e. severity is assessed during treatment. Severe asthma is defined as the requirement for (not necessarily just prescription or use of) high-intensity treatment. Asthma severity may be influenced by the underlying disease activity and by the patient's phenotype, both of which may be further described using pathological and physiological markers. These markers can also act as surrogate measures for future risk.

A systematic review of the content and delivery of education in pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a core component of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management with well recognized benefits. While suggestions for educational content within pulmonary rehabilitation have been detailed in clinical guidance, it is unclear what educational content is delivered as part of pulmonary rehabilitation, who delivers it, and how it is delivered. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify what educational content is delivered as part of pulmonary rehabilitation, how is this delivered and who delivers it. Databases were searched from 1981 to 2017 using multiple search terms related to "pulmonary rehabilitation" and "education". RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified. This included 6 survey studies, 5 quasi-experimental studies and 3 RCTs. Five key topics that were consistently included within PR programmes were identified as: 1) Anxiety/depression and stress management. 2) Early recognition of signs of infection. 3) Dyspnea and symptom management. 4) Nutrition. 5) Techniques using inhalers and nebulizers. Broader topics such as welfare/benefits, sexuality, and advance care directives did not frequently feature. Only four studies used tools to measure knowledge or learning pre and post rehabilitation in an attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of the education delivered as part of PR. CONCLUSIONS: The delivery of education in PR programmes is variable and does not follow suggested educational topics. Education needs to take a patient centered motivational approach to ensure effective delivery. Further research into appropriate educational outcome measures are needed, in order to evaluate the changes in behaviour associated with education.

Lay educators in asthma self management: reflections on their training and experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To capture the experiences and feelings of lay educators in an asthma self-management programme to aid understanding of optimal methods of recruitment, training and retention, and to enhance their value within the programme. METHODS: A multi site randomised controlled equivalence trial of asthma educators and primary care practice based nurses during which the educators were asked to keep a diary of their experience. A qualitative thematic analysis of these diaries was undertaken. RESULTS: Eight lay educators supplied diaries. From these diaries emerged personal reasons for involvement in the programme, constructive comments on the training programme, a need for preparation for the realities of clinical practice and significant ongoing support and training. CONCLUSION: Lay educators are a potential resource for giving self-management education to patients with long-term conditions such as asthma. However, there are some considerations that need to be taken into account regarding contracts, retention and continual support. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Lay educators need a flexible but comprehensive training programme, contracts, on site mentoring and support. They seem most contented when welcomed by health professionals and treated as part of the team.

The diagnosis of COPD in primary care; gender differences and the role of spirometry.

BACKGROUND: Females with exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease now account for one half of all hospital admissions for that condition and rates have been increasing over the last few decades. Differences in presentations of disease between genders have been shown in several conditions and this study explores whether there are inter gender biases in probable diagnoses in those suspected to have COPD. METHODS: 445 individuals with a provisional diagnosis by their General Practitioner of "suspected COPD" or "definite COPD" were referred to a community Respiratory Assessment unit (CRAU) for tests including spirometry. Gender, demographics, respiratory symptoms and respiratory medical history were recorded. The provisional diagnoses were compared with the final diagnosis made after spirometry and respiratory specialist nurse review and the provisional diagnosis was either confirmed as correct or refuted as unlikely. RESULTS: Significantly more men (87.5%) had their diagnosis of "definite COPD" confirmed compared to 73.9% of women (p = 0.021). When the GP suggested a provisional diagnosis of "suspected COPD" (n = 265) at referral, this was confirmed in 60.9% of men and only 43.2% of women (p = 0.004). There was a different symptom pattern between genders with women being more likely to report allergies, symptoms starting earlier in life, and being less likely than men to report breathlessness as the main symptom. CONCLUSIONS: These results may suggest a difference between genders in some of the clinical features of COPD and a difference in likelihood of a GPs provisional diagnosis of COPD being correct. The study reiterates the absolute importance of spirometry in the diagnosis of COPD.

Randomized trial comparing weekly versus 3-week chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial.

PURPOSE: A randomized trial of chemotherapy, given on either a 1-week or a 3-week schedule, was performed in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The aim was to determine if weekly scheduling produced survival superior to conventional treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-eight patients with SCLC with either limited disease (LD; 276 patients) or good-prognosis extensive disease (ED; 162 patients) were randomized. Weekly chemotherapy was 12 alternating cycles of ifosfamide/doxorubicin and cis-platin/etoposide (PE), while 3-week treatment was six alternating cycles of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (CAV) and PE. Thoracic irradiation was administered 3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy to LD patients who attained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients were well matched for clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Overall response was the same in both arms: 82.3% (39.4% CR) with weekly and 81.1% (36.9% CR) with 3-week treatment. The median survival (MS) durations were 10.8 and 10.6 months for weekly and 3-week chemotherapy, respectively. The 2-year survival rates were 11.8% and 11.7% in the weekly and 3-week arms, respectively. Received dose-intensity (DI) was 73.9% of projected for weekly treatment and 92.7% for 3-week treatment. Hematologic toxicity was the major dose-limiting toxicity for the weekly treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial excludes at 90% power a benefit of greater than 10% for 2-year survival for weekly treatment. The received DI was reduced to a greater extent with weekly treatment, mainly due to hematologic toxicity.

Multiple tracheal strictures following mechanical ventilation.

Patients presenting with features of airway narrowing (cough, wheeze, exertional breathlessness and obstructive spirometry) may be suffering from either localized or generalized airway obstruction. Doctors sometimes overlook the possibility of localized obstruction (whether due to tumour, foreign body aspiration or stenosis), and patients may experience symptoms for a long time before the correct diagnosis is made.

The use of complementary medicines by those with asthma.

Complementary therapies attract considerable media attention and previous surveys of members of an asthma patient organisation suggested that their use by those with asthma was commonplace. This report concerns a study of a stratified cross section of the asthma population designed to give a more representative insight into current usage of complementary therapies. A sift questionnaire was used to identify those with asthma and 785 of those so identified undertook a semi-structured face-to-face interview. Only 6% of the study population were current users of complementary therapies with use being more common amongst those who expressed most concern regarding their current medication. Low use of complementary therapies may well reflect satisfaction with current management and suggests that previous surveys may have been unrepresentative of a more balanced population of those with asthma.

The availability of smoking cessation advice from health professionals--a census from one East London District.

A survey of 382 hospital inpatients and a survey of 500 adults attending a GP open access chest X-ray service showed that 18% and 25% respectively were current smokers. Sixty per cent of the inpatient smokers and three quarters of the community smokers expressed a wish to stop smoking, and 44% of the inpatient smokers and 62% of the community smokers reported having received advice from their primary care physician to stop smoking. However, when the community smokers were asked about more specific advice they had received to help them stop smoking, only 13% had received advice regarding nicotine replacement therapies and under 5% had been given the telephone number of a smoking cessation support service (Smokers Quitline). Use of nicotine replacement therapies nearly doubles the success rate for smoking cessation, and it is essential for all health professionals to be able to give specific advice as to how smokers may be able to quit.

The dissemination of the British Guideline on the Management of Asthma 2003.

The BTS/SIGN British Guideline on the Management of Asthma was published in February 2003 (4). If health outcomes are to be influenced successfully, dissemination of the guideline and implementation of recommendations is essential. We report the dissemination activities undertaken during the 18 weeks following the guideline launch. To facilitate implementation a range of educational materials were produced reflecting the key messages from the guideline. In addition to postal mailing of the guideline to appropriate healthcare professionals, both educational materials and the guidelines were made freely available from the BTS and SIGN websites. In total, 135,710 copies of the guideline and 90,198 copies of the Quick Reference Guide were downloaded in the first 18 weeks, representing a considerable increase over the number of copies of the 1997 guidelines disseminated by mailing alone. Large quantities of educational materials were downloaded with many used for teaching purposes. An on-line survey suggested that most respondents rated the materials as useful or very useful. Using websites to disseminate guidelines is a cost-effective method of informing health professionals of their content and is a more active process than the passive receipt of mailed copies. The availability of interactive educational materials for use in teaching appears to have been popular.

Clinical value and cost of a respiratory sleep-related breathing disorders screening service for snorers referred to a District General Hospital ENT department.

Sleep-related breathing disorders and snoring often co-exist in the community. We hypothesized that a significant proportion of patients referred from primary care to ENT surgeons for management of snoring might have significant sleep-related breathing disorders requiring medical management. The Respiratory Medicine Department at Whipps Cross Hospital, London, U.K. screened all such referrals using sleep questionnaires, overnight oximetry and diagnostic sleep studies where necessary as recommended by the Royal College of Physicians of London. Over 38 months, 115 patients were screened, of whom 43 (38%) had clinically significant sleep-disordered breathing. One-third were established on nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and the remainder were mainly offered conservative treatment. The cost of the screening service is estimated at 14,000 Pounds for the initial year. The savings to the ENT service and the possible long-term benefits to the patients identified as having sleep-disordered breathing balance this. We conclude that screening all referred snorers for sleep-disordered breathing using a simple protocol identifies a significant number requiring medical management at a relatively low cost to the service provider.