Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 43(7): 898-901, 2006 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16941373

RESUMO

A total of 564 travelers were enrolled in a study aimed at investigating the influence of traveler's diarrhea in the development of irritable bowel syndrome. At 6-7 months after repatriation, we found that an episode of traveler's diarrhea was associated with a quintuple risk of developing irritable bowel syndrome.


Assuntos
Diarreia/complicações , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
2.
Harefuah ; 145(11): 803-6, 863, 862, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17183950

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open access endoscopy facilitates the performance of colonoscopy on a physician's request, without a prior consultation with a gastroenterologist. OBJECTIVES: To investigate: (1) the rates of relevant endoscopic findings in patients referred by family physicians compared to other specialists; (2) whether there is overuse of open-access colonoscopy in our country where the examination is free of charge for the patient; (3) whether a high rate of pre-malignant and malignant incidental findings might justify a more liberal approach to the indications of colonoscopy. METHODS: Prospective study including all consecutive ambulatory patients referred for open access colonoscopy. The indication for the examination was tabulated according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines. Endoscopic findings were classified into relevant or normal; each relevant finding was correlated with the indication for which the examination was performed. RESULTS: A total of 34.2% of patients had a colonoscopy performed for an inappropriate indication; family physicians had a slightly higher rate of appropriate indications compared with the other specialists. However, a relevant endoscopic finding was diagnosed only in 14.0% of their referred cases, compared with 22.8% of the other specialists (p = 0.032). Polyps larger than 5 mm or a malignant tumor were diagnosed in 20.7% of the colonoscopies; 19 out of the 83 cases (23%) were diagnosed in examinations performed for inappropriate indications. CONCLUSION: It was found that 34% of the colonoscopies were performed for inappropriate indications. A higher proportion of relevant endoscopic findings was diagnosed among patients referred by surgeons, oncologists and internists as compared with those referred by family physicians. Considering that as much as 23% of polyps and malignant tumors were found in cases performed for inappropriate indications, we suggest that a liberal approach to the indications for colonoscopy--probably age over 50 years--may benefit the patients.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia/métodos , Médicos de Família , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia/normas , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA